On Sat, 30 Jan 2021, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> >> If I use \starttikz[name=example], I get
> >> "JOBNAME-temp-tikzThick-example.tmp".
> >> I’d like to get something like "COMPONENTNAME-##-example.tmp" or a path
> >> like "COMPONENTNAME/example_##.tmp".
> >> Is there a configuration hook in
On 1/30/21 10:50 AM, Philipp A. wrote:
Am I caught in a spam filter somewhere?
Compiles fine here with 2021.01.28 18:22
Thomas
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Am I caught in a spam filter somewhere?
Am So., 3. Jan. 2021 um 13:30 Uhr schrieb Philipp A. :
> So, where do I go with this?
>
> Can nobody reproduce it? Should I submit it to the bug tracker? How can I
> help to get this resolved?
>
> Am Sa., 26. Dez. 2020 um 11:29 Uhr schrieb Philipp A. >:
>
> Am 30.01.2021 um 00:13 schrieb Aditya Mahajan :
>
> For \processFILTER, t-filter does not even read the file... so it has to do
> with how the filtercommand is defined.
>
>> Since this fails already, I don’t know if \processFILTERfile also uses
>> bufferbefore/-after (it should).
>
> It
It is fine again. Thank you a lot, Hans.
Jairo :)
El vie., 29 de ene. de 2021 5:48 p. m., Pablo Rodriguez
escribió:
> On 1/29/21 11:24 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > On 1/29/2021 9:59 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> >> Could anyone confirm this bug?
> > hm, some overload protection side effect ...
