Re: [NTG-context] Setting table of contents depth by number rather than by list

On 12/24/2021 5:45 PM, Jason Ross via ntg-context wrote: Dear list, Is it possible to set the maximum table of contents depth to a number rather than providing an explicit list of section names? Background: I am developing an exporter for Org mode. In Org, users can specify the number of

Re: [NTG-context] upload

On 12/24/2021 11:08 PM, Jairo A. del Rio wrote: Hi, Hans. In Ubuntu 20.04: resolvers       > lua > loading file '/home/coragyps/lmtx/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkxl/node-cmp.lmt' succeeded fatal error: storage cannot be marked strange ... must be a mismatch in binary ... i'll

Re: [NTG-context] upload

Same with W64 on W11. On 2021-12-24 17:08, Jairo A. del Rio via ntg-context wrote: Hi, Hans. In Ubuntu 20.04: resolvers       > lua > loading file '/home/coragyps/lmtx/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkxl/node-cmp.lmt' succeeded fatal error: storage cannot be marked Jairo El vie, 24

Re: [NTG-context] Setting table of contents depth by number rather than by list

> On 24 Dec 2021, at 16:45, Jason Ross via ntg-context > wrote: > > Dear list, > > Is it possible to set the maximum table of contents depth to a number rather > than providing an explicit list of section names? > > > Background: > > I am developing an exporter for Org mode. In Org,

Re: [NTG-context] Contextual removal of some ligatures using fonts.handlers.otf.addfeature (LuaTeX 1.13.2)

> On 24 Dec 2021, at 18:34, Thomas Savary via ntg-context > wrote: > > Hello, dear list ! > > In order to fix a few bugs in some OpenType features included in EB Garamond > font provided by Google Fonts, I am trying to remove some ligatures > (erroneous in some contexts) with

Re: [NTG-context] upload

Hi, Hans. In Ubuntu 20.04: resolvers > lua > loading file '/home/coragyps/lmtx/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkxl/node-cmp.lmt' succeeded fatal error: storage cannot be marked Jairo El vie, 24 dic 2021 a la(s) 13:45, Hans Hagen via ntg-context ( ntg-context@ntg.nl) escribió: > Hi,

Re: [NTG-context] Setting table of contents depth by number rather than by list

On 12/24/21 1:48 PM, Denis Maier via ntg-context wrote: Anyway, I agree that a solution via hierarchy levels would be nice. That's what I'm hoping to achieve. I'm not familiar enough with low-level ConTeXt to do something like this but it seems like it ought to be possible. You don't do

Re: [NTG-context] Setting table of contents depth by number rather than by list

Anyway, I agree that a solution via hierarchy levels would be nice. Denis Maier via ntg-context hat am 24.12.2021 22:43 geschrieben: Jason Ross hat am 24.12.2021 22:37 geschrieben:

Re: [NTG-context] Setting table of contents depth by number rather than by list

Jason Ross hat am 24.12.2021 22:37 geschrieben: On 12/24/21 1:29 PM, Denis Maier wrote: I probably wasn't clear. You will support toc:2. This:

Re: [NTG-context] Setting table of contents depth by number rather than by list

On 12/24/21 1:29 PM, Denis Maier wrote: I probably wasn't clear. You will support toc:2. This: #+Context_Section_Levels: '(chapter section subsection) will translate into a definesectionlevels command and inform your exporter about the used sectionlevels. Once the used commands are known it

Re: [NTG-context] Setting table of contents depth by number rather than by list

Jason Ross via ntg-context hat am 24.12.2021 22:22 geschrieben: On 12/24/21 1:20 PM, Denis Maier via ntg-context wrote: >> >> I see. >> >> Next try:

Re: [NTG-context] Setting table of contents depth by number rather than by list

On 12/24/21 1:20 PM, Denis Maier via ntg-context wrote: I see. Next try: add a new option "#+Context_Section_Levels: Thus will take an alist. Now you'll know about the user defined structure levels and the toc option can be translated to the corresponding setting. (Here again, you can

Re: [NTG-context] Setting table of contents depth by number rather than by list

Denis Maier via ntg-context hat am 24.12.2021 22:13 geschrieben: Jason Ross via ntg-context hat am 24.12.2021 18:53 geschrieben: On 12/24/21 9:49

Re: [NTG-context] Setting table of contents depth by number rather than by list

Jason Ross via ntg-context hat am 24.12.2021 18:53 geschrieben: On 12/24/21 9:49 AM, Denis Maier via ntg-context wrote: For the six = for the toc... Denis Maier via

[NTG-context] Contextual removal of some ligatures using fonts.handlers.otf.addfeature (LuaTeX 1.13.2)

Hello, dear list ! In order to fix a few bugs in some OpenType features included in EB Garamond font provided by Google Fonts, I am trying to remove some ligatures (erroneous in some contexts) with fonts.handlers.otf.addfeature. I must be missing something, because I can't get it to work.

[NTG-context] upload

Hi, When wrapping up before the weekend I uploaded a new lmtx (bottom floats fixed afaiks, but hat mechanism might see some improvements anyway next year; exit codes more reliable; some low level tracing; side float coming loose from section head issue solved; ...). I'm experimenting with

Re: [NTG-context] Setting table of contents depth by number rather than by list

On 12/24/21 9:49 AM, Denis Maier via ntg-context wrote: For the six = for the toc... Denis Maier via ntg-context hat am 24.12.2021 18:42 geschrieben: Can't you just define a default structurelevel scheme and a default combined list for the six. If a user redefines the structure level

Re: [NTG-context] Why are back-to-back \autocite commands not working in ConTeXt-SBL?

That may work with something like ``` \cite[loctext={{2},{2}}][{na2006,clark1989}] ``` or ``` \autocite[{{\loc[2]},{\loc[2]}}]{{na2006,clark1989}} ``` (I know that the ConTeXt \cite command supports multicites with comma-separated entries, but I forget exactly what the expected syntax looks

Re: [NTG-context] Setting table of contents depth by number rather than by list

For the six = for the toc... Denis Maier via ntg-context hat am 24.12.2021 18:42 geschrieben: Can't you just define a default structurelevel scheme and a default combined list for the six. If a user redefines the structure level

Re: [NTG-context] Setting table of contents depth by number rather than by list

Can't you just define a default structurelevel scheme and a default combined list for the six. If a user redefines the structure level scheme, they will just redefine the combined list as well. Would that work? Denis Jason Ross via ntg-context

[NTG-context] Setting table of contents depth by number rather than by list

Dear list, Is it possible to set the maximum table of contents depth to a number rather than providing an explicit list of section names? Background: I am developing an exporter for Org mode. In Org, users can specify the number of levels they want in the table of contents with a number. I

Re: [NTG-context] Critical Editions?

> On 24 Dec 2021, at 12:07, Hans Hagen via ntg-context > wrote: > > a lot related to numbering, referencing and notes and much of that is present > > so if you can team up with other critical edition users ... i suppose that > Idris can send you his onthology-so-far I'm not a user but was

Re: [NTG-context] Why are back-to-back \autocite commands not working in ConTeXt-SBL?

biblatex has special multicite commands=> e.g. autocites. could that be used in that case? Denis Joey McCollum via ntg-context hat am 24.12.2021 15:43 geschrieben: Joel, Thanks for

Re: [NTG-context] Why are back-to-back \autocite commands not working in ConTeXt-SBL?

Additionally, if you want to cite page numbers, the key to use in ConTeXt-SBL is "loctext". (I was not aware of an "extra" key when I was developing the module.) So, you should be able to make the ConTeXt-style \cite command work as follows: ``` \cite[loctext=2][na2006] ``` I hope this helps,

Re: [NTG-context] Why are back-to-back \autocite commands not working in ConTeXt-SBL?

Joel, Thanks for mentioning this! I think I've run into the same issue before, but I wasn't sure how I should go about fixing it, so this might be a good place to get suggestions from others. The \autocite, \inlinecite, \parencite, and \footcite helper commands are intended to handle trailing

[NTG-context] Why are back-to-back \autocite commands not working in ConTeXt-SBL?

I am using the ConTeXt-SBL module to handle the citations in my article. Using the plain \cite[na2006] command has worked fine. But there are some situations where I want the footnote to include page number details. I tried using \cite[extra=2][na2006], but that doesn't seem compatible with

Re: [NTG-context] LTR footnotes from RTL paragraph

Hans Hagen via ntg-context hat am 24.12.2021 13:13 geschrieben: On 12/21/2021 10:02 AM, denis.ma...@unibe.ch wrote: Nice! So, IIUC, you should also be able to do something like this

Re: [NTG-context] LTR footnotes from RTL paragraph

On 12/21/2021 10:02 AM, denis.ma...@unibe.ch wrote: Nice! So, IIUC, you should also be able to do something like this then: \definealign[AlignStandard][verytolerant,stretch] \definealign[AlignR2L][AlignStandard][r2l] Is that correct? No, because these definitions are interpreted at

Re: [NTG-context] Critical Editions?

On 12/21/2021 10:50 AM, hanneder--- via ntg-context wrote: I just started switching after long years of typesetting with La-/Omega-/pdfTeX to Context and was exploring the capabilities of the program for typesetting critical editions. So I was wondering whether there is any updated

Re: [NTG-context] Bug in mp-xbox.mpxl (circleit)

On 12/22/2021 2:33 PM, Jacob Kauffmann via ntg-context wrote: Hi list, I realized that circleit throws an error. It works fine if I replace boxes_generic_declare by boxes_declare in line 244 in mp-xbox.mpxl we need two replacements, also in 313 thanks, Hans