I tried all those Hraban, unsuccessfully, but finally 'happened' upon a
solution by trying whitespace instead in the setups. Except that I had
read somewhere in the mailing list (Pablo I think) that I would need to
use \directsetup. I don't actually understand why, have never been sure
about
I tried all those Hraban, unsuccessfully, but finally 'happened' upon a
solution by trying whitespace instead in the setups. Except that I had
read somewhere in the mailing list (Pablo I think) that I would need to
use \directsetup. I don't actually understand why, have never been sure
about
Am 23.04.23 um 09:21 schrieb jbf via ntg-context:
I realise that I should have been talking about the space between local
footnotes, rather than interlinespace (previous email on this issue),
but my basic problem still stands. My efforts to influence the space
between footnotes placed locally
Am 22.04.23 um 21:34 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context:
On 4/22/2023 5:49 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context wrote:
This is probably for Hans:
The list of Unicode blocks in char-ini.lua is not complete, compared
with ftp://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/Blocks.txt
(I was looking for
I realise that I should have been talking about the space between local
footnotes, rather than interlinespace (previous email on this issue),
but my basic problem still stands. My efforts to influence the space
between footnotes placed locally is to no avail so far.
I assume it is \setupnote
