Hi
On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 3:33 AM Gavin via ntg-context
wrote:
>
> Hi MetaFun fans,
>
> Following a suggestion of Hans, I experimented with && and &&& and for
> joining paths in MetaFun. The joiner &&& produces one long path, but && and
> seem to produce a disconnected path which
Hi MetaFun fans,
Following a suggestion of Hans, I experimented with && and &&& and for
joining paths in MetaFun. The joiner &&& produces one long path, but && and
seem to produce a disconnected path which includes all the original paths.
However, if one of the paths is a single
On Sun, 31 Dec 2023, Shiv Shankar Dayal wrote:
> It would be nice to either support Metapost 3D or Asymptote. Right now I
> generate images separately and embed them in PDF using externalfigure command
> which works but I have to maintain all the graphics separately.
It is possible to obtain
On 12/30/2023 8:04 PM, Shiv Shankar Dayal wrote:
Hi all,
It would be nice to either support Metapost 3D or Asymptote. Right now I
generate images separately and embed them in PDF using externalfigure
command which works but I have to maintain all the graphics separately.
next year we will
On 30/12/23 30/12/23, 12:04, Shiv Shankar Dayal wrote:
It would be nice to either support Metapost 3D
Very simple MP pseudo 3D is included in
tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mpiv/mp-tres.mpiv
Alan
___
If
Hi Shiv and Fabrice,
> On Dec 30, 2023, Shiv Shankar Dayal wrote:
> It would be nice to either support Metapost 3D or Asymptote.
> On Dec 6, 2021, Fabrice L wrote:
> I would be very interested to see an example of a Metafun drawing made with
> the help of LuaTeX to speed up some calculations.
Hi all,
It would be nice to either support Metapost 3D or Asymptote. Right now I
generate images separately and embed them in PDF using externalfigure
command which works but I have to maintain all the graphics separately.
Respect,
Shiv
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 9:45 AM Shiv Shankar Dayal
wrote:
>
> In LaTeX, I can use \hdots for horizontal dots and \hdotsfor{n} to fill for
> several columns in a determinant. But these do not work in ConTeXt. What is
> the equivalent for these in ConTeXt?
You can try \HF or \HF[n].
Shiv Shankar Dayal schrieb am 30.12.2023 um 09:41:
In LaTeX, I can use \hdots for horizontal dots and \hdotsfor{n} to
fill for several columns in a determinant. But these do not work in
ConTeXt. What is the equivalent for these in ConTeXt?
Can you show the desired output from LaTeX with a PDF
Shiv Shankar Dayal schrieb am 30.12.2023 um 09:40:
I tried this for old style factorial, but it appears much below the
line in which it is used. How can I bring it up?
Replace the \inmframed command with \mcframed.
\define[1]\oldfact
Never mind, I found the solution on list that we can use \dotfill and
\multispan{n}{\dotfill} as a substitute for what I have asked for.
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 2:11 PM Shiv Shankar Dayal <
shivshankar.da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In LaTeX, I can use \hdots for horizontal dots and \hdotsfor{n} to
In LaTeX, I can use \hdots for horizontal dots and \hdotsfor{n} to fill for
several columns in a determinant. But these do not work in ConTeXt. What is
the equivalent for these in ConTeXt?
--
Respect,
Shiv Shankar Dayal
I tried this for old style factorial, but it appears much below the line in
which it is used. How can I bring it up?
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 6:18 PM Shiv Shankar Dayal <
shivshankar.da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> A simple alternative to tikz is the usage of \framed.
>>
>> \define[1]\oldfact
>>
13 matches
Mail list logo
