[NTG-context] Re: mtxrun.lua:10080: bad argument #9 to 'format'

2024-01-28 Thread vm via ntg-context
while also on linux platform: mtxrun --script font --list --spec --filter="fontname=ibm*" mtxrun --script font --list --spec --filter="fontname=ple*" give correct result (as in listing the available installed ibmplex fonts) mtxrun --script font --list --spec --filter="fontname=*" mtxrun

[NTG-context] Re: How to stop

2024-01-28 Thread Bruce Horrocks
> On 27 Jan 2024, at 21:29, Joel via ntg-context wrote: > > I have a document that uses ~40 different TABLE configurations, each with > their own special requirements, such as these below, and in total, perhaps > 2000 tables appear in a file, using one of the configurations. > >

[NTG-context] mtxrun.lua:10080: bad argument #9 to 'format'

2024-01-28 Thread Garulfo
Hi, return is OK with:     mtxrun --script font --list --spec --filter="fontname=ibm*" but removing the m from the pattern mtxrun --script font --list --spec --filter="fontname=ib*" I get : lua error : function call: ...0-app_context-linux-64/tex/texmf-linux-64/bin/mtxrun.lua:10080: bad

[NTG-context] Re: archive.contextgarden.net 404?

2024-01-28 Thread Jim
On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 19:42 (+0100), Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 00:42, Jim wrote: >> Today I ran across three references to archive.contextgarden.net, one in a >> tugboat article and two others in context garden wiki pages. >> I was not able to reach that site. Is it

[NTG-context] Re: archive.contextgarden.net 404?

2024-01-28 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 00:42, Jim wrote: > > Today I ran across three references to archive.contextgarden.net, one in a > tugboat article and two others in context garden wiki pages. > > I was not able to reach that site. Is it (long since?) dead or is it just > on vacation temporarily? It is

[NTG-context] Re: Section number in the margin and the section title followed by paragraph!

2024-01-28 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context schrieb am 27.01.2024 um 18:40: On 1/27/24 17:40, Ali Ali wrote: Thanks, those seems close to what I wanted but not exactly. The ASCII graphic (better in typewriter font) may explain what I desired, ``` text width