The contextgarden mentions a command flushfootnotes, however
\starttext
\flushfootnotes
\stoptext
results in an error:
! Undefined control sequence.
log
system tex error on line 2 in file sectioning.tex: Undefined
control sequence ...
l.2 \flushfootnotes
ConTeXt ver: 2013.03.20 10
[location=text]
\postponefootnotes
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD
TEST\footnote{\dorecurse{10}{\input tufte \par}}
\eTR\eTD
\eTABLE
\page
Notes:
\flushfootnotes
\stoptext
___
If your question is of interest to others as well
---
\starttext
\setupfootnotes[location=text]
\postponefootnotes
\postponenotes
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD
TEST\footnote{\dorecurse{10}{\input tufte \par}}
\eTR\eTD
\eTABLE
\page
Notes:
\flushfootnotes
\placefootnotes
works here (mkiv). But I don't use these commands that often, so there
is a big chance
someone help me please?
Thanks
Steffen
---
\starttext
\setupfootnotes[location=text]
\postponefootnotes
\postponenotes
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD
TEST\footnote{\dorecurse{10}{\input tufte \par}}
\eTR\eTD
\eTABLE
\page
Notes:
\flushfootnotes
\placefootnotes
works here (mkiv). But I don't use
) failed ...
Could someone help me please?
Thanks
Steffen
---
\starttext
\setupfootnotes[location=text]
\postponefootnotes
\postponenotes
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD
TEST\footnote{\dorecurse{10}{\input tufte \par}}
\eTR\eTD
\eTABLE
\page
Notes:
\flushfootnotes
\placefootnotes
works here (mkiv
attempt (see minimal below) failed ...
Could someone help me please?
Thanks
Steffen
---
\starttext
\setupfootnotes[location=text]
\postponefootnotes
\postponenotes
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD
TEST\footnote{\dorecurse{10}{\input tufte \par}}
\eTR\eTD
\eTABLE
\page
Notes:
\flushfootnotes
\placefootnotes
:
\flushfootnotes
\placefootnotes
works here (mkiv). But I don't use these commands that often, so
there is a big chance, that this is not optimal ;)
Hmm, the result looks strange:
http://werksatz.com/attachments/postpone_1.pdf
A pagebreak above? And note not split?
oh, you use mkii. sorry
Hi Steffen,
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
When setuphead is defined with page=yes there shall NO footnote be
written from a chapter/section before!
Never. Not even a split note.
Agreed. The same should be true in MKII, I absolutely consider the
current failure of \flushfootnotes a bug, I just
Am 27.09.2009 um 10:14 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
As there was no answer at all on this post:
does it mean that there is no way to solve my problem??
\flushfootnotes should do the trick.
Sure, that's what I assumed, too. But it doesn't ;o(
Please have a look
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Am 27.09.2009 um 10:14 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
As there was no answer at all on this post:
does it mean that there is no way to solve my problem??
\flushfootnotes should do the trick.
Sure, that's what I assumed, too. But it doesn't ;o
Am 27.09.2009 um 11:39 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Am 27.09.2009 um 10:14 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
As there was no answer at all on this post:
does it mean that there is no way to solve my problem??
\flushfootnotes should do the trick.
Sure
Hi,
in a huge document (about 450 pages 1200 footnotes) I used
postponefootnotes/flushfootnotes.
Annoyingly this changed the page break for the entire book not only at
the affected pages ...
Searching the archive gave me a post by horaciosuarez_at_hotmail.com
who had a similar problem
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi,
in a huge document (about 450 pages 1200 footnotes) I used
postponefootnotes/flushfootnotes.
Annoyingly this changed the page break for the entire book not only at
the affected pages ...
Searching the archive gave me a post by horaciosuarez_at_hotmail.com who
hello all:
If I use:
\postponefootnotes
a table
\flushfootnotes
to use footnotes in a table, works fine, but I have problems in the
following chapters, the text flow diferent.
Is the a way to reset \postponefootnotes? and is necesary?
thankyou in advance.
Horacio
On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 22:35:40 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
an addition: footnotes within blocks are lost too. Numbering goes on,
but the note does not appear.
has to do with inserts not possible and disappearing in boxes
\postponefootnotes something tabular \flushfootnotes
\postponefootnotes something tabular \flushfootnotes
But this disturbs the alignment:
\midaligned{%
\bTABLE
…
\eTABLE}
When the footnotemarker is wide (for example 888), then the table
gets shifted away from the middle!
\setupindenting[no] was missing.
Without the footnote it was centered
Gerhard Kugler wrote:
Hi,
an addition: footnotes within blocks are lost too. Numbering goes on,
but the note does not appear.
has to do with inserts not possible and disappearing in boxes
\postponefootnotes something tabular \flushfootnotes
some structures have this built in
Hans
\SomeText \eTD \bTD[nx=2] Better, but I need to
calculate the hsize, and there are other workarounds for correct vertical
spacing. Furthermore, the footnote is lost.\eTD \eTR
\bTR \bTD \SomeText \eTD \bTD xxx \eTD \bTD \SomeText \eTD \eTR
\eTABLE \flushfootnotes
btw, tabulate is the most clever
gave the same answer), I'm sorry for this...
Perhaps, this is not possible with ConTeXt, but this is, what I'm looking
for:
- multi-page table with horizontal lines
- footnotes, that appear at bottom of each page
I've tried with \appendtoks \flushfootnotes \to \everyshipout
or \flushfootnotes
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Hans Hagen wrote:
Peter Münster wrote:
Perhaps, this is not possible with ConTeXt, but this is, what I'm looking
for:
- multi-page table with horizontal lines
- footnotes, that appear at bottom of each page
I've tried with \appendtoks \flushfootnotes
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Hans Hagen Outside wrote:
\startPar
bla\Par bla\postponefootnotes\footnote{a footnote, that gets hidden...}\Par bla
\stopPar
\flushfootnotes
Thanks, it seems, that I even don't need \flushfootnotes !
\starttabulate[]
\NC bla \NC bla \footnote{test} \NC bla \NC \NR
hidden...}\Par bla
\stopPar
\flushfootnotes
or
\starttabulate[]
\NC bla \NC bla \footnote{test} \NC bla \NC \NR
\stoptabulate
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH
22 matches
Mail list logo
