..}, \mono{...} etc.
BUT, \bold{...}, \italic{...} export (to xhtml, etc.)
whereas {\bf ...}, {\it ...} do not.
Are you sure?
Also, \setuphighlight [emphasis] [style=bold] and
\emphasis{...}
is a *functionally* better way of formatting text.
It depends on the document size, for a simple letter \
o
> \italic{...}, \mono{...} etc.
BUT, \bold{...}, \italic{...} export (to xhtml, etc.)
whereas {\bf ...}, {\it ...} do not.
Also, \setuphighlight [emphasis] [style=bold] and
\emphasis{...}
is a *functionally* better way of formatting text.
Alan
___
le to have their own setups to configure how
>> these appear, just as \setuphighlight would provide.
>>
>> However there's one situation which I can't think how to handle; I'd
>> like to have a setup append and prepend some text, just like before=
>> and
r own setups to configure how
these appear, just as \setuphighlight would provide.
However there's one situation which I can't think how to handle; I'd
like to have a setup append and prepend some text, just like before=
and after= for various other setups. If \setuphighlight h
st as \setuphighlight would provide.
However there's one situation which I can't think how to handle; I'd
like to have a setup append and prepend some text, just like before=
and after= for various other setups. If \setuphighlight had before=
and after=, this would suit me perfectly.
On 5/15/2015 9:57 PM, Kate F wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for something like \definehighlight which I can use to
markup various things in inline body text. I want different
environments to be able to have their own setups to configure how
these appear, just as \setuphighlight would provide.
Ho
Hi,
I'm looking for something like \definehighlight which I can use to
markup various things in inline body text. I want different
environments to be able to have their own setups to configure how
these appear, just as \setuphighlight would provide.
However there's one situation whi
ed! And basically makes ConTeXt look like Word!
>
> The use of another way of defining a command for the standard font styles
> is proof enough for 2. Also, not everybody would want the predefined styles
> and colors
> so they will have to be changed in the setuphighlight an
Hi Keith,
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 05:56:54 -0700, Keith J. Schultz
wrote:
Also, not everybody would want the predefined styles and colors
so they will have to be changed in the setuphighlight anyway!
Indeed, but the point is not to predefine the styles but to predefine the
highlights. E.g
and
colors
so they will have to be changed in the setuphighlight anyway!
The use of such a command is convient, but we should think about the
nomenclature!
The nomenclature should reflect what it does. We can have synonyms to satisfy
the
semantic usage of it!
regards
Keith
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
