Renaud AUBIN wrote:
To indent or not to indent, that is the question !!! ;-)
\setupformulas[indentnext=yes]
Cheers, Taco
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Hi all,
I use \setupindenting[medium,yes] in my document.
When I use:
\placeformula[GiPivel]
\startformula
\frac{\overrightarrow{G_iP_i}}{\Delta T} = \frac{d_i.\vec{y_i} +
\delta_i.\vec{t_i}}{\Delta T} =
\def\setdisplaydimensions
{\displayindent\leftdisplayskip
\advance\displayindent\leftdisplaymargin
\displaywidth\hsize
\ifdim\hangindent\zeropoint
\advance\displayindent\hangindent
\else
\advance\displaywidth\hangindent
\fi
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
i'll also add an option to center at the page level and not locally
Will this solve item 60 [1] in the collector?
Yes.
Taco
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
On 1/25/06, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
i'll also add an option to center at the page level and not locally
Will this solve item 60 [1] in the collector?
Yes.
Awesome.
nikolai
___
ntg-context mailing list
I want to place a math formula in the item of an itemlist, but I keep
getting overfull hboxes.
A minimal example follows:
\starttext
\startitemize
\item dit is een
\item dit is een formule
\placeformula[-]
\startformula
n= 0
Hans van der Meer wrote:
I want to place a math formula in the item of an itemlist, but I keep
getting overfull hboxes.
A minimal example follows:
\starttext
\startitemize
\item dit is een
\item dit is een formule
\placeformula[-]
\startformula
n= 0
\startformula
\mframed[offset=.3em,rulethickness=1pt]{
I=x-\sqrt2\,\arctan\frac{x}{\sqrt2}+C}
\stopformula
it does typeset a displayed formula. However, you could still force
displayed style by adding a \displaystyle command at the beginning of
your \mframed argument.
That's ok now
Hi All,
how to make a boxed formula with ConTeXt?
Thanks!
--
// Jilani KHALDI
http://jkhaldi.oltrelinux.com
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
The way I usually do it:
\startformula
\mframed[offset=.3em,rulethickness=1pt]{a^2 + b^2 = c^2}
\stopformula
Regards,
David
Le Vendredi 30 septembre 2005 à 13:41 +0200, Jilani Khaldi a écrit :
Hi All,
how to make a boxed formula with ConTeXt?
Thanks
David Munger wrote:
The way I usually do it:
\startformula
\mframed[offset=.3em,rulethickness=1pt]{a^2 + b^2 = c^2}
\stopformula
Thank you for your answer. I seems that \startformula .. \stopformula
doesn't have any effect to produce a dispaly mode formula.
so:
\startformula
\mframed
Jilani,
Thank you for your answer. I seems that \startformula .. \stopformula
doesn't have any effect to produce a dispaly mode formula.
When I try:
\startformula
\mframed[offset=.3em,rulethickness=1pt]{
I=x-\sqrt2\,\arctan\frac{x}{\sqrt2}+C}
\stopformula
it does typeset a displayed
On 5/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try to use:
\startformula
\left\{ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xx yy \\
zz aa
\end{array} \right.
\stopformula
But Context log says
Undefined control sequence \begin{array}.
\begin{array} comes from LaTeX.
How can I input multi-line equation in ConTeXt?
Title: Re: [NTG-context] [ at beginning of
formula ?
At 15:29 -0500 16/11/04, Matthias Weber wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to typeset
[\partial,B]=0
Hi Matthias,
Despite Hans' suggestion of putting \relax in front of [, in my
installation of ConTeXt this works well:
\starttext
\startformula
0
Hi Otared,
the actual problem arises with
\starttext
\startformula
[A,B] =0.
\stopformula
\stoptext
or, even worse, with
\starttext
\startformula
[\partial,B] =0.
\stopformula
\stoptext
Hans' solution is to use \relax whenever one has a [ at the beginning
of a formula:
\starttext
At 7:57 -0500 17/11/04, Matthias Weber wrote:
Hi Otared,
the actual problem arises with
\starttext
\startformula
[A,B] =0.
\stopformula
\stoptext
or, even worse, with
\starttext
\startformula
[\partial,B] =0.
\stopformula
\stoptext
Hi Matthias,
Yes are right, indeed...
However I tried the
Monday, November 15, 2004 Nikolai Weibull wrote:
* Christopher Creutzig [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Nov 15, 2004 17:20]:
Try \startnathequation ... \stopnathequation instead.
Ah, thanks. Is there still a way to get unnumbered equations?
nikolai
Do not put \placeformula before the equation :)
Hallo,
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
Try \startnathequation ... \stopnathequation instead.
Ah, thanks. Is there still a way to get unnumbered equations?
Do not put \placeformula before the equation :)
Well, that changes a bit the spacing, how about \placeformula[-] ?
Tobias
Hello,
I'd like to typeset
[\partial,B]=0
but
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
0= [ A ,B ] = 0
\stopformula
gives just =0
(see below)
while
\stoptext
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
0= [ A ,B ]
\stopformula
\stoptext
works. What is the meaning of [ at the beginning of a formula
of [ at the beginning of a formula,
and how do I get rid of it?
there is a forward scan for [ ] i.e. a reference
just put a \relax in front of your intentional [
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
]
\stopformula
\stoptext
works. What is the meaning of [ at the beginning of a formula,
and how do I get rid of it?
there is a forward scan for [ ] i.e. a reference
just put a \relax in front of your intentional [
Hans
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
\usemodule[nath]
\starttext
$A = (B, C, D, E)$
\placeformula
\startformula
A = (B, C, D, E)
\stopformula
\stoptext
! Undefined control sequence.
l.6 A = (
B, C, D, E)
? X
Try \startnathequation ... \stopnathequation instead. Or patch
Anybody has an idea on this?
Tuesday, September 7, 2004 Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
Hello,
what I'm trying to achieve is a way to have formula numbers
contain the part number together with the chapter number, as
in:
a = b (part.chapter.formula)
instead of
a = b
Hello,
what I'm trying to achieve is a way to have formula numbers
contain the part number together with the chapter number, as
in:
a = b (part.chapter.formula)
instead of
a = b (chapter.formula)
which is what you have by default, or
a = b (part.formula)
which
301 - 324 of 324 matches
Mail list logo
