Re: [NTG-context] (again) bug?: \about disables \setupnote[split=strict]

2014-03-16 Thread Hans Hagen
On 3/13/2014 6:12 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Dear list, I have the following sample: \setuppapersize[A6] \setupnote[footnote][split=strict] \starttext \section[bspaces]{Blank spaces} \section[paragraph]{Paragraphs} \dorecurse{11}{This is a sentence.\par} This is already explained in sections

[NTG-context] (again) bug?: \about disables \setupnote[split=strict]

2014-03-13 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
Dear list, I have the following sample: \setuppapersize[A6] \setupnote[footnote][split=strict] \starttext \section[bspaces]{Blank spaces} \section[paragraph]{Paragraphs} \dorecurse{11}{This is a sentence.\par} This is already explained in sections \about[bspaces] y \about[paragraph

[NTG-context] \about disables \setupnote[footnote][split=strict]

2014-03-11 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
Dear list, I have just accidentally noted that \about disables the option [split=strict] in \setupnote. Here is a sample: \mainlanguage[es] \setuppapersize[A6] \setupnote[footnote][split=strict] \starttext \section[espacios]{Espacios} \section[parrafos]{Párrafos} \dorecurse{5}{Esta es una

Re: [NTG-context] options of \setupnotation and \setupnote

2013-04-15 Thread Hans Hagen
On 4/15/2013 4:30 PM, Marco Patzer wrote: On 2013–04–15 Hans Hagen wrote: @Hans: The module documentation fails to build for this module. mtxrun --script modules --process $(mtxrun core-sys.mkiv) mtxrun --script modules --process auto:core-sys.mkiv Thanks, I didn't know that one. weir

Re: [NTG-context] options of \setupnotation and \setupnote

2013-04-15 Thread Marco Patzer
On 2013–04–15 Hans Hagen wrote: > >@Hans: The module documentation fails to build for this module. > > > > mtxrun --script modules --process $(mtxrun core-sys.mkiv) > > mtxrun --script modules --process auto:core-sys.mkiv Thanks, I didn't know that one. > weird ... works here Sorry, copy-pas

Re: [NTG-context] options of \setupnotation and \setupnote

2013-04-15 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 15.04.2013 um 16:11 schrieb Hans Hagen : > On 4/15/2013 1:52 PM, Marco Patzer wrote: >> On 2013–04–15 Tim Li wrote: >> >>> Could you tell me what's the options of these two commands that >>> haven't been updated on the wiki? >> >> The file strc-not.mkvi is quite well documented. >> >> @Hans

Re: [NTG-context] options of \setupnotation and \setupnote

2013-04-15 Thread Hans Hagen
On 4/15/2013 1:52 PM, Marco Patzer wrote: On 2013–04–15 Tim Li wrote: Could you tell me what's the options of these two commands that haven't been updated on the wiki? The file strc-not.mkvi is quite well documented. @Hans: The module documentation fails to build for this module. mtxrun

Re: [NTG-context] options of \setupnotation and \setupnote

2013-04-15 Thread Tim Li
thanks for your help. From: schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:01:54 +0200 To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Subject: Re: [NTG-context] options of \setupnotation and \setupnote Am 15.04.2013 um 13:17 schrieb Tim Li :Could you tell me what's the options of these two commands

Re: [NTG-context] options of \setupnotation and \setupnote

2013-04-15 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 15.04.2013 um 13:17 schrieb Tim Li : > Could you tell me what's the options of these two commands that haven't been > updated on the wiki? http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2013/072165.html Wolfgang ___ I

Re: [NTG-context] options of \setupnotation and \setupnote

2013-04-15 Thread Marco Patzer
On 2013–04–15 Tim Li wrote: > Could you tell me what's the options of these two commands that > haven't been updated on the wiki? The file strc-not.mkvi is quite well documented. @Hans: The module documentation fails to build for this module. mtxrun --script modules --process $(mtxrun core-sy

[NTG-context] options of \setupnotation and \setupnote

2013-04-15 Thread Tim Li
Could you tell me what's the options of these two commands that haven't been updated on the wiki? ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to th

Re: [NTG-context] setupnote[footnote] adding extra pages

2012-01-03 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 03.01.2012 um 04:42 schrieb Chris Lott: > Why does this document create three pages, with the footnote on the > second and a third that is blank? > > \setuppagenumbering[state=stop] > \setupnote[footnote][numberconversion=Romannumerals] > \starttext > This is a sample

Re: [NTG-context] setupnote[footnote] adding extra pages

2012-01-03 Thread Chris Lott
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Chris Lott wrote: > Why does this document create three pages, with the footnote on the > second and a third that is blank? > > \setuppagenumbering[state=stop] > \setupnote[footnote][numberconversion=Romannumerals] > \starttext > This is a sam

[NTG-context] setupnote[footnote] adding extra pages

2012-01-02 Thread Chris Lott
Why does this document create three pages, with the footnote on the second and a third that is blank? \setuppagenumbering[state=stop] \setupnote[footnote][numberconversion=Romannumerals] \starttext This is a sample letter. \footnote{foo} \stoptext If I remove the \setupnote line, then everything

Re: [NTG-context] \setupnote (was subfootnote)

2010-10-14 Thread luigi scarso
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: > luigi scarso wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Alan BRASLAU >> wrote: >>> On Tuesday 12 October 2010 11:54:28 Steffen Wolfrum wrote: Hans recommended: \stopfootnote{} >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> This

Re: [NTG-context] \setupnote (was subfootnote)

2010-10-12 Thread Hans Hagen
On 12-10-2010 5:06, Alan BRASLAU wrote: Fixed in next beta. Not unless Wolfgang mails me a patch that he's confident with (as this is sort of tricky). Okay, 'next' can be any next, so watch a "fixed in *the* next beta" -) Hans --

Re: [NTG-context] \setupnote (was subfootnote)

2010-10-12 Thread Alan BRASLAU
ption[##1]{}{##2}% > \endgroup > \namednoteparameter{#1}\c!next}} > > Example: > > \starttext > > One\startfootnote one\stopfootnote > Two\startfootnote two\stopfootnote > > \setupnote[footnote][next=\autoinsertnextspace] > > One\startfootnote one\sto

Re: [NTG-context] \setupnote (was subfootnote)

2010-10-12 Thread Aditya Mahajan
spacing after the footnote enumerator differs from \footnote{}) The \stopfootnote gobbles the next space, to prevent this you can say in mkii \setupnote[footnote][next=\autoinsertnextspace] but the ”next” key is missing in mkiv. Indeed! What to do? Patch strc-not.mkiv Did not see this

Re: [NTG-context] \setupnote (was subfootnote)

2010-10-12 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, luigi scarso wrote: You are right, my apologies for the error. I mean that in the meanwhile perhaps you can use somenthing like this \long\def\StartFootnote#1\StopFootnote{\startfootnote#1\stopfootnote\space} Better use \autoinsertnextspace rather than \space. Or perhaps

Re: [NTG-context] \setupnote (was subfootnote)

2010-10-12 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
>>> (the spacing after the footnote enumerator differs from \footnote{}) >> >> The \stopfootnote gobbles the next space, to prevent this you can say in >> mkii \setupnote[footnote][next=\autoinsertnextspace] but the ”next” key is >> missing in mkiv. > > Inde

Re: [NTG-context] \setupnote (was subfootnote)

2010-10-12 Thread luigi scarso
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: > luigi scarso wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Alan BRASLAU >> wrote: >>> On Tuesday 12 October 2010 11:54:28 Steffen Wolfrum wrote: Hans recommended: \stopfootnote{} >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> This

Re: [NTG-context] \setupnote (was subfootnote)

2010-10-12 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
luigi scarso wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Alan BRASLAU > wrote: >> On Tuesday 12 October 2010 11:54:28 Steffen Wolfrum wrote: >>> >>> Hans recommended: >>> >>> \stopfootnote{} >>> >> >> Thank you. >> >> This will work, but it is pretty ugly.% >> \startfootnote >> Hopefully Hans will

Re: [NTG-context] \setupnote (was subfootnote)

2010-10-12 Thread luigi scarso
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: > On Tuesday 12 October 2010 11:54:28 Steffen Wolfrum wrote: >> >> Hans recommended: >> >> \stopfootnote{} >> > > Thank you. > > This will work, but it is pretty ugly.% > \startfootnote > Hopefully Hans will fix this in mkiv. > \stopfootnote{}

Re: [NTG-context] \setupnote (was subfootnote)

2010-10-12 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 11:54:28 Steffen Wolfrum wrote: > > Hans recommended: > > \stopfootnote{} > Thank you. This will work, but it is pretty ugly.% \startfootnote Hopefully Hans will fix this in mkiv. \stopfootnote{} In the meantime, we will just have to make do, but the special syntax a

Re: [NTG-context] \setupnote (was subfootnote)

2010-10-12 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
>>> (the spacing after the footnote enumerator differs from \footnote{}) >> >> The \stopfootnote gobbles the next space, to prevent this you can say in >> mkii \setupnote[footnote][next=\autoinsertnextspace] but the ”next” key is >> missing in mkiv. >

Re: [NTG-context] \setupnote (was subfootnote)

2010-10-12 Thread Alan BRASLAU
m \footnote{}) > > The \stopfootnote gobbles the next space, to prevent this you can say in > mkii \setupnote[footnote][next=\autoinsertnextspace] but the ”next” key is > missing in mkiv. Indeed! What to do? Alan ___