On 3/16/2021 3:11 PM, Jacob Kauffmann wrote:
Dear list,
lmtx draws a fraction line in \binom{n}{k},
ConTeXt ver: 2021.02.23 17:47 LMTX fmt: 2021.2.26 int: english/english
The same happens with {n \choose k}.
The other version I tested draws it correctly (without the bar
Dear list,
lmtx draws a fraction line in \binom{n}{k},
ConTeXt ver: 2021.02.23 17:47 LMTX fmt: 2021.2.26 int: english/english
The same happens with {n \choose k}.
The other version I tested draws it correctly (without the bar):
ConTeXt ver: 2019.03.21 21:39 MKII fmt: 2019.11.14
Hans Hagen writes:
> indeed. this is what (sort of) happens in case of a plugged in renderer:
>
> \sqrt{#1} -> ...\mathstylehbox{#1}... -> ...\hbox{\stylecommand #1}...
>
> when #a = a \over b the style gets applied to the a only as \over
> creates two (pseudo) groups i.e. the \over isolates a a
On 4/22/2014 1:53 AM, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
I have been trying out the newish
\setupmathradical[sqrt][alternative=mp], which has been very nice
because of the fine control over the radical sign.
I've noticed that it crunches the denominator in \sqrt{a\over b}
For example:
\starttext
\placeformu
I have been trying out the newish
\setupmathradical[sqrt][alternative=mp], which has been very nice
because of the fine control over the radical sign.
I've noticed that it crunches the denominator in \sqrt{a\over b}
For example:
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
\sqrt{k\over m}\quad \sqrt{\di
On 10/26/2013 3:53 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
Unicode sure makes things easy:
U+002F / SOLIDUS SLASH
U+2044 ⁄ FRACTION SLASH
U+2215 ∕ DIVISION SLASH
U+FF0F ／ FULLWIDTH SOLIDUS FULLWIDTH SLASH
Of course, we key in ascii / (0x2f).
From how these display (in
[dejavu,12pt]
> >>>\starttext
> >>>$1/2$
> >>>
> >>>$1\,/\,2$
> >>>\stoptext
> >>>
> >>>The second hand-tuned example is obviously nicer.
> >>
> >>it looks like a font issue to me .. i could hack
a font issue to me .. i could hack a solution but prefer not
to do that (the less exceptions we have the better)
Not a font issue. ConTeXt is using the fraction slash (which is intended
to be used with vulgar fractions) not the regular slash.
the problem is that (last time i looked in
ator.
> >
> >\setupbodyfont [dejavu,12pt]
> >\starttext
> >$1/2$
> >
> >$1\,/\,2$
> >\stoptext
> >
> >The second hand-tuned example is obviously nicer.
>
> it looks like a font issue to me .. i could hack a soluti
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:14:45 +0200
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> > So, who can fix the font issue?
> > (tex/texmf/fonts/opentype/public/xits/xits-math.otf)
>
> https://github.com/khaledhosny/xits-math/issues
OK, reported to Khaled.
Thanks
Alan
_
Am 25.10.2013 um 10:08 schrieb Alan BRASLAU :
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 07:23:43 +0900
> Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>> it looks like a font issue to me .. i could hack a solution but prefer
>> not to do that (the less exceptions we have the better)
>>
>> Hans
>
> So, who can fix the font issue?
> (tex/
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 07:23:43 +0900
Hans Hagen wrote:
> it looks like a font issue to me .. i could hack a solution but prefer
> not to do that (the less exceptions we have the better)
>
> Hans
So, who can fix the font issue?
(tex/texmf/fonts/opentype/public/xits/xits-math.otf)
Alan
__
On 10/24/2013 2:46 PM, "H. Özoguz" wrote:
\setupbodyfont [dejavu,12pt]
\starttext
$a/b$
$1/2$
$π/3$
\stoptext
Is this indeed the desired spacing? What do others think?
Thanks.
I think you are right, I don't know if this is really desired, but I
don't think so. Escpecially one gets problems
\setupbodyfont [dejavu,12pt]
\starttext
$a/b$
$1/2$
$π/3$
\stoptext
Is this indeed the desired spacing? What do others think?
Thanks.
I think you are right, I don't know if this is really desired, but I
don't think so. Escpecially one gets problems with "2" in the denominator.
\setupbodyf
Hello,
Using the dejavu font, inline math fractions (e.g. $a/b$) look to me to
be spaced too tightly. Below are some minimal examples:
\setupbodyfont [dejavu,12pt]
\starttext
$a/b$
$1/2$
$π/3$
\stoptext
Is this indeed the desired spacing? What do others think?
Thanks.
Alan
__
On 4 juin 2013, at 21:34, Hans Hagen wrote:
> […]
> ok, a new feature for SB:
Thanks hans! Very nice feature. Wikified in
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/fraction
but the output on the wiki is not correct since ConTeXt there is mkii.
Best regards: OK
>
> \define
On 6/4/2013 3:04 PM, Sietse Brouwer wrote:
Hoi Sander,
Sander wrote:
This gives basically three equally long division lines
The fraction line of a nested fractions is in fact shorter than that
of its parent fraction, but by a very small amout. This seems to be
the standard behaviour -- I
Hoi Sander,
Sander wrote:
> This gives basically three equally long division lines
The fraction line of a nested fractions is in fact shorter than that
of its parent fraction, but by a very small amout. This seems to be
the standard behaviour -- I tried the formula in LaTeX, and the
differe
Sorry, I meant to write numerator. (In Dutch it is teller/noemer ;))
On 03-06-13 19:40, Sander Maijers wrote:
Hi,
How can I make the subfraction in the denominator of a fraction appear
smaller even though the nominator is very small? This gives basically
three equally long division lines
Hi,
How can I make the subfraction in the denominator of a fraction appear
smaller even though the nominator is very small? This gives basically
three equally long division lines:
\startfomula
\frac{\mu_{Z}}{\frac{\sqrt{\VAR{Z}}{\sqrt{N_{\text{segments}
\stopformula
Mojca,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the response on lengthening the main fraction bar? Any way
>>> to make the main fraction bar wider?
>>>
>>> There is a genfrac command in amslatex. Anything similar in Context?
>>
>> m-newmat.tex defi
Question. Is this genfrac identical to the one in ams definitions?
On Jul 4, 2006, at 9:08 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, David Arnold wrote:
>
>> Taco, Mojca,
>>
>> Thanks for the response on lengthening the main fraction bar? Any way
>> to ma
Aditya,
Thanks. You are very helpful.
On Jul 4, 2006, at 9:08 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, David Arnold wrote:
>
>> Taco, Mojca,
>>
>> Thanks for the response on lengthening the main fraction bar? Any way
>> to make the main fraction bar w
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, David Arnold wrote:
> Taco, Mojca,
>
> Thanks for the response on lengthening the main fraction bar? Any way
> to make the main fraction bar wider?
>
> There is a genfrac command in amslatex. Anything similar in Context?
m-newmat.tex defines genfrac.
\usemo
Taco, Mojca,
Thanks for the response on lengthening the main fraction bar? Any way
to make the main fraction bar wider?
There is a genfrac command in amslatex. Anything similar in Context?
On Jul 2, 2006, at 4:00 AM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> David Arnold wrote:
>> All,
>>
>
On 7/2/06, David Arnold wrote:
> All,
>
> How can I extend the main fraction bar in the following expression,
> making it a tad longer?
>
> \placeformula
> \startformula
> \dfrac{\dfrac{9+3x-2x^2}{x^2-16}}{\dfrac{4x^3-9x}{2x^2+5x-12}}.
> \stopformula
I don't know
David Arnold wrote:
> All,
>
> How can I extend the main fraction bar in the following expression,
> making it a tad longer?
Just add a bit of whitespace to the right and left:
\dfrac{\,\dfrac{9+3x-2x^2}{x^2-16}\,}
{\,\dfrac{4x^3-9x}{2x^2+5x-12}\,}
You may want to add
All,
How can I extend the main fraction bar in the following expression,
making it a tad longer?
\placeformula
\startformula
\dfrac{\dfrac{9+3x-2x^2}{x^2-16}}{\dfrac{4x^3-9x}{2x^2+5x-12}}.
\stopformula
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
28 matches
Mail list logo
