thankyou very much.
Horacio Suarez
Editorial Antropofagia
www.eantropofagia.com.ar
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:14:53 -0500
From: adit...@umich.edu
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] itemize and [] question
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Horacio Suarez wrote
On 31-10-2010 7:39, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 06:48:21PM +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 31.10.2010 um 18:18 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 16:57, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 31-10-2010 12:11, Herbert Voss wrote:
Do I need some additional settings to get
Do I need some additional settings to get lower
greek letters in the example? I get only a dot for g
\starttext
\startitemize[g]
\item foo
\item bar
\item baz
\item baz
\stopitemize
\startitemize[G]
\item foo
\item bar
\item baz
\item baz
\stopitemize
\stoptext
MTXrun | current version:
On 31-10-2010 12:11, Herbert Voss wrote:
Do I need some additional settings to get lower
greek letters in the example? I get only a dot for g
\starttext
\startitemize[g]
\item foo
\item bar
\item baz
\item baz
\stopitemize
\startitemize[G]
\item foo
\item bar
\item baz
\item baz
\stopitemize
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 16:57, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 31-10-2010 12:11, Herbert Voss wrote:
Do I need some additional settings to get lower
greek letters in the example? I get only a dot for g
does the font that you use have greek symbols?
It seems to be a bug in code, not the lack of
Am 31.10.2010 um 18:18 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 16:57, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 31-10-2010 12:11, Herbert Voss wrote:
Do I need some additional settings to get lower
greek letters in the example? I get only a dot for g
does the font that you use have greek symbols?
2010/10/31 Herbert Voss herbert.v...@fu-berlin.de:
Do I need some additional settings to get lower
greek letters in the example? I get only a dot for g
\setupbodyfont[dejavu]
\starttext
\startitemize[g]
\item foo
\item bar
\item baz
\item baz
\stopitemize
\startitemize[G]
\item foo
\item bar
Am 31.10.2010 18:48, schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
The difference between mkii and mkiv is that mkii use math mode
to display the greek characters while mkiv takes them from
the bodyfont and latin modern has no greek.
yes, that was the problem.
HErbert
2010/10/31 Herbert Voss herbert.v...@fu-berlin.de:
Am 31.10.2010 18:48, schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
The difference between mkii and mkiv is that mkii use math mode
to display the greek characters while mkiv takes them from
the bodyfont and latin modern has no greek.
yes, that was the
Am 31.10.2010 19:33, schrieb luigi scarso:
The difference between mkii and mkiv is that mkii use math mode
to display the greek characters while mkiv takes them from
the bodyfont and latin modern has no greek.
yes, that was the problem.
You can use Symbola
thanks
Herbert
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 06:48:21PM +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 31.10.2010 um 18:18 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 16:57, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 31-10-2010 12:11, Herbert Voss wrote:
Do I need some additional settings to get lower
greek letters in the example?
2010/10/31 Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org:
LM has upper case Greek, no idea why not lower case as well.
I still find the idea of greek letters in a font called latin
interesting... :-)
Best
Martin
___
If your
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:18:20PM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
2010/10/31 Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org:
LM has upper case Greek, no idea why not lower case as well.
I still find the idea of greek letters in a font called latin
interesting... :-)
I'm more interested about the
In the documentation I found \setupitemgroup, \setupitemize
and in the list of all commands \setupitems. I didn't
find any example for the \setupitems. However, I can set
all parameters with the other two commands. So the
question is: when do I need \setupitems and has someone
a working example?
On 2010-10-20 10:33:40, Herbert Voss wrote:
In the documentation I found \setupitemgroup, \setupitemize
and in the list of all commands \setupitems. I didn't
find any example for the \setupitems. However, I can set
all parameters with the other two commands. So the
question is: when do I need
Am 20.10.2010 10:54, schrieb Philipp Gesang:
“\setupitems” is the setup for the “\items” command. There is a
demonstration for this in the new manual[1], p. 250.
I see ...
thanks
Herbert
___
If your question is of
An example from the documentation:
\starttext
\startitemize[1,packed]
\head supported image formats in \PDFTEX \par
\startitemize[a]
\item png \item eps \item pdf
\stopitemize
\head non supported image formats in \PDFTEX \par
\startitemize[continue]
\item jpg \item
2010/10/19 Herbert Voss herbert.v...@fu-berlin.de:
An example from the documentation:
\starttext
\startitemize[1,packed]
\head supported image formats in \PDFTEX \par
\startitemize[a]
\item png \item eps \item pdf
\stopitemize
\head non supported image formats in \PDFTEX
On 19-10-2010 11:17, luigi scarso wrote:
2010/10/19 Herbert Vossherbert.v...@fu-berlin.de:
An example from the documentation:
\starttext
\startitemize[1,packed]
\head supported image formats in \PDFTEX \par
\startitemize[a]
\item png \item eps \item pdf
\stopitemize
\head
Am 19.10.2010 11:27, schrieb Hans Hagen:
I get with mkIV (TeXLive2010)
[...]
systems : begin file .tex at line 3
! Math error: parameter \Umathquad\displaystyle is not set.
\mathematics ... #1\else \Ustartmath #1\Ustopmath
\fi
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:27:35AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 19-10-2010 11:17, luigi scarso wrote:
2010/10/19 Herbert Vossherbert.v...@fu-berlin.de:
An example from the documentation:
\starttext
\startitemize[1,packed]
\head supported image formats in \PDFTEX \par
Am 19.10.2010 11:40, schrieb Khaled Hosny:
systems : begin file .tex at line 3
! Math error: parameter \Umathquad\displaystyle is not set.
\mathematics ... #1\else \Ustartmath #1\Ustopmath
\fi
\dodosymbol ...bol \csname \??ss
Am 19.10.2010 11:27, schrieb Hans Hagen:
If I remember right this is a bug in the luatex version that ships with
texlive.
I updated from http://tlcontrib.metatex.org/2010
and now it is ok
Herbert
___
If your
2010/10/19 Herbert Voss herbert.v...@fu-berlin.de:
Am 19.10.2010 11:27, schrieb Hans Hagen:
If I remember right this is a bug in the luatex version that ships with
texlive.
I updated from http://tlcontrib.metatex.org/2010
and now it is ok
hm, what does
# context --version
say ?
--
luigi
2010/10/19 Herbert Voss herbert.v...@fu-berlin.de:
Am 19.10.2010 13:00, schrieb luigi scarso:
2010/10/19 Herbert Voss herbert.v...@fu-berlin.de:
Am 19.10.2010 11:27, schrieb Hans Hagen:
If I remember right this is a bug in the luatex version that ships with
texlive.
I updated from
Am 19.10.2010 12:50, schrieb Herbert Voss:
Am 19.10.2010 11:27, schrieb Hans Hagen:
If I remember right this is a bug in the luatex version that ships with
texlive.
I updated from http://tlcontrib.metatex.org/2010
and now it is ok
But only for a moment ... :-( But now I know
what
On 10/19/2010 02:01 PM, Herbert Voss wrote:
Why can the setting of TEXINPUTS a problem for
context?
TEXINPUTS can *always* be a problem and really should not
be used at all any more. It is a historical environment
variable from the nineties, and it overrules just about
every path in a modern
}
\stopitemize
\stopbuffer
\bTABLE % it works if you comment out the table
\bTR\bTD \getbuffer \eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
\getbuffer
\stoptext
It seems that using itemize in TABLE disturbs the following lists. Is there
something I can do about it?
Fixed in next beta.
Wolfgang
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 09:20, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Fixed in next beta.
Hmmm ... Hans the junior :)
I thought this was one of the most frequent answers by Hans :) :) :)
Mojca
___
If your question is of
Hello,
a stopper option resets item to default value. I expect a) and b)
instead of big dot in the first itemize.
mkiv current version: 2010.10.06 10:20
\starttext
\startitemize[a,stopper=)]
\item one.
\item two.
\stopitemize
\startitemize[a]
\item one.
\item two.
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Am 10.10.2010 um 20:39 schrieb Marius:
Hello,
a stopper option resets item to default value. I expect a) and b)
instead of big dot in the first itemize.
mkiv current version: 2010.10.06 10:20
\starttext
\startitemize[a,stopper=)]
You can’t mix keywords and assignments in the same
}
\item \dorecurse{20}{zwei }
\item \dorecurse{20}{drei }
\stopitemize
\stopbuffer
\getbuffer % - correct indenting
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD \getbuffer \eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
\getbuffer % - wrong indenting
\stoptext
If one uses an itemize environment with the fit-option in a TABLE the
further
}{drei }
\stopitemize
\stopbuffer
\getbuffer % - correct indenting
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD \getbuffer \eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
\getbuffer % - wrong indenting
\stoptext
If one uses an itemize environment with the fit-option in a TABLE the further
itemize environments getting disturbed.
Is this a bug
the table
\bTR\bTD \getbuffer \eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
\getbuffer
\stoptext
It seems that using itemize in TABLE disturbs the following lists. Is there
something I can do about it?
Greeting
Andreas
___
If your
Dear All,
I am trying to get an itemization like this
(1) This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
(2) This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
i.e., for each item, there is no
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Zhaopeng Xing zpx...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All,
I am trying to get an itemization like this
(1) This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
(2) This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
This is a
Am 13.09.2010 um 15:43 schrieb Zhaopeng Xing:
Dear All,
I am trying to get an itemization like this
(1) This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
(2) This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
This is a test. This is a
Minimal nonworking example:
% Taken from the wiki
\starttypescript [Bonum]
\definetypeface [Bonum] [rm] [serif] [bonum] [default]
\definetypeface [Bonum] [ss] [sans] [adventor] [default] [rscale=0.887]
\definetypeface [Bonum] [tt] [mono] [cursor][default] [rscale=1.163]
Hi Vedran,
Your example shows indeed that
\startitemize[3]
works fine but
\startitemize[4]
does not, with
ConTeXt version 2010.06.23 12:45.
(Actually \startitemize[x] works fine when x=1, or 2 or 3, and does not work as
expected when x 3).
However with mkii everything is fine.
Best regards:
On 22-7-2010 4:54, Vedran Miletić wrote:
\starttypescript [Bonum]
\definetypeface [Bonum] [rm] [serif] [bonum] [default]
\definetypeface [Bonum] [ss] [sans] [adventor] [default] [rscale=0.887]
\definetypeface [Bonum] [tt] [mono] [cursor][default] [rscale=1.163]
On 22-7-2010 4:54, Vedran Miletić wrote:
Minimal nonworking example:
% Taken from the wiki
\starttypescript [Bonum]
\definetypeface [Bonum] [rm] [serif] [bonum] [default]
\definetypeface [Bonum] [ss] [sans] [adventor] [default] [rscale=0.887]
\definetypeface [Bonum] [tt]
On 22-7-2010 5:16, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Vedran,
Your example shows indeed that
\startitemize[3]
works fine but
\startitemize[4]
does not, with
ConTeXt version 2010.06.23 12:45.
(Actually \startitemize[x] works fine when x=1, or 2 or 3, and does not work as
expected when x 3).
However with
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Hello,
Strange, but if I specify margins for itemize, then nowhite losts its
effect, and I need to specify it again in every itemize group.
\setupitemize[1,leftmargin=1cm, rightmargin=1cm, nowhite]
Don't mix keywords and key-value pairs.
\setupitemize[1
On Monday 14 June 2010 08:32:08 Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Hello,
Strange, but if I specify margins for itemize, then nowhite losts its
effect, and I need to specify it again in every itemize group.
\setupitemize[1,leftmargin=1cm, rightmargin=1cm, nowhite
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Monday 14 June 2010 08:32:08 Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Hello,
Strange, but if I specify margins for itemize, then nowhite losts its
effect, and I need to specify it again in every itemize group.
\setupitemize[1,leftmargin=1cm, rightmargin=1cm
Hello,
Strange, but if I specify margins for itemize, then nowhite losts its
effect, and I need to specify it again in every itemize group.
\setupitemize[1,leftmargin=1cm, rightmargin=1cm, nowhite]
\startitemize[nowhite] %duplicate, but does not work without it
\item a
\item b
\stopitemize
I forgot furnish, that first itemize list is twocolumn (or threecolumn etc.)
Jaroslav
Dne 29.4.2010 7:17, Jaroslav Hajtmar napsal(a):
Hi, all.
I want make enumeration list as per:
1. a)
b)
2. a)
b)
etc.
When I use:
\startitemize[n,columns]
\item
\startitemize[a][stopper=)]
\item
Hi, all.
I want make enumeration list as per:
1. a)
b)
2. a)
b)
etc.
When I use:
\startitemize[n,columns]
\item
\startitemize[a][stopper=)]
\item Pravděpodobnost
\item Logaritmická funkce a~její vlastnosti
\stopitemize
\item
\startitemize[a][stopper=)]
\item Rovina a~přímka
Following construction does not work for me.
\setupitemize[each][packed][beforehead={}]
Is there any possibility to suppress the vertical space around \head in
packed itemize?
(latest MKII)
greetings Jan
--
Tato zpráva byla vytvořena převratným poštovním klientem Opery:
http
$A^c \cap B^c$
\item $A \cap B^c$
\stopitemize
\stopexercici
[...]
\stopcolumns
but the itemize does NOt display as two columns. What is the solution
for that?
Please, CCme
Thanks a lot,
Xan.
PS: The exercici enviroment is defined as:
\defineenumeration
[exercici]
[text={\startcolor
\cap B$
\item $A \cup B^c$
\item $A^c \cap B^c$
\item $A \cap B^c$
\stopitemize
\stopexercici
[...]
\stopcolumns
but the itemize does NOt display as two columns. What is the solution
for that?
Columns can't be nested but you can use \start/\stopsimplecolumns for
the itemize.
Wolfgang
En/na Wolfgang Schuster ha escrit:
Columns can't be nested but you can use \start/\stopsimplecolumns for
the itemize.
Wolfgang
Thanks Wolfgang. Perfect solution!
For the other hand, can't columns be nested? Why not put in
\startitemize code one if: if there is _in_ a column environment,use
Am 11.04.10 13:01, schrieb Xan:
For the other hand, can't columns be nested?
No.
Why not put in \startitemize code one if: if there is _in_ a column
environment,use \startsimplecolumns, Is it technically possible?
Possible but not so simple as you think.
Wolfgang
En/na Wolfgang Schuster ha escrit:
Am 11.04.10 13:01, schrieb Xan:
For the other hand, can't columns be nested?
No.
Why not put in \startitemize code one if: if there is _in_ a column
environment,use \startsimplecolumns, Is it technically possible?
Possible but not so simple as you
why does this use LMMathItalic10-Regular for the OS numbering?
\startitemize[m,packed,text]
\item a
\item b
\stopitemize
\os clearly works in other parts because it's using minion
% pdffonts file.pdf
name type emb sub uni object ID
On 24-1-2010 18:17, Mohamed Bana wrote:
why does this use LMMathItalic10-Regular for the OS numbering?
\startitemize[m,packed,text]
\item a
\item b
\stopitemize
\os clearly works in other parts because it's using minion
\depends how \os is defined
Producer: xdvipdfmx (0.7.3)
your
Hi,
I tried to extend the example with a general setup-instruction,
however this creates an error:
\setupitemgroup[itemize][each][n,fit,broad]
[start=8,itemalign=flushright]
\starttext
\startitemize
\item bla
\item bli
\item di
\item bla
\item di
\item blu
\stopitemize
\stoptext
! Illegal
On 19-1-2010 19:38, Willi Egger wrote:
Hi,
I tried to extend the example with a general setup-instruction, however
this creates an error:
\setupitemgroup[itemize][each][n,fit,broad][start=8,itemalign=flushright]
\starttext
\startitemize
\item bla
\item bli
\item di
\item bla
\item di
\item blu
On Sun, Jan 17 2010, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Bug or feature? Should we add it to the tracker?
Bug, I think. Can you add them?
Ok, done.
Cheers, Peter
--
Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
On 18-1-2010 10:32, Peter Münster wrote:
On Sun, Jan 17 2010, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Bug or feature? Should we add it to the tracker?
Bug, I think. Can you add them?
Ok, done.
can you check the beta ...
\starttext
\setupitemize[start=9]
\startitemize[n][itemalign=flushright]
Am 18.01.10 14:59, schrieb Hans Hagen:
can you check the beta ...
There is a problem with the horizontal spacing.
\showframe
\starttext
\setupitemize[start=9]
\startitemize[n]
\dorecurse{2}{\item bla}
\stopitemize
\setupitemize[start=9]
\startitemize[n][itemalign=flushright]
Hi,
I uploaded a beta with some mkiv adaptions of itemize, esp the
itemalignment
\startitemize[n][width=3cm,itemalign=flushright,distance=1em]
\dorecurse{12}{\item test}
\stopitemize
it also works with fit and distance is now also hounoured; a side effect
is that broad no longer is driven
The joinedup parameter in \startitemize is meant to close the gap
between the list and the preceding material. The margin parameter is
for horizontal movement of the list, is I understand it. However,
addition of a margin to the \startitemize disables the joinedup. Is
this expected
Am 17.01.2010 um 13:46 schrieb Hans van der Meer:
The joinedup parameter in \startitemize is meant to close the gap between the
list and the preceding material. The margin parameter is for horizontal
movement of the list, is I understand it. However, addition of a margin to
the
Risking that, like my previous question, this one too will be posed
the Nth time, I nevertheless ask.
Typesetting a numbered list I tried a lot of paramaters on the itemize
macros, but always the code:
\startitemize[][start=8]
\item a
\item b
\item c
\item d
\stopitemize
results in:
8. a
9
nevertheless ask.
Typesetting a numbered list I tried a lot of paramaters on the
itemize macros, but always the code:
\startitemize[][start=8]
\item a
\item b
\item c
\item d
\stopitemize
results in:
8. a
9. b
10. c
11. d
whereas I would have had:
8. a
9. b
10. c
11. d
That is, the item labels aligned
Am 17.01.2010 um 15:06 schrieb Hans van der Meer:
Tricked by the mail program editor! Of course I meant to accomplish (with |
for the left edge):
| 8. a
| 9. b
|10. c
|11. d
\startitemize[fit][start=8,itemalign=flushright]
Wolfgang
Thanks.
'itemalign' seems absent from the original ConTeXt-manual I have in
use (but that is fairly old, of course).
Your code results in very tight item labels:
1.start-of-item-text
I managed to get
1. start-of-item-text
by using [stopper={.~}] But is there a more general way to enlarge
Am 17.01.2010 um 15:28 schrieb Hans van der Meer:
Thanks.
'itemalign' seems absent from the original ConTeXt-manual I have in use (but
that is fairly old, of course).
itemalign is a newer option (was added about 2 years ago)
Your code results in very tight item labels:
On Sun, Jan 17 2010, Hans van der Meer wrote:
But is there a more general way to enlarge the
item's width? Using [width=dimension] seemed no help
Hello Hans,
It works here:
\starttext
\startitemize[width=5em]
\item bla
\stopitemize
\stoptext
My version: 2010.01.15 15:49
Cheers, Peter
--
Am 17.01.2010 um 15:49 schrieb Peter Münster:
On Sun, Jan 17 2010, Hans van der Meer wrote:
But is there a more general way to enlarge the
item's width? Using [width=dimension] seemed no help
Hello Hans,
It works here:
\starttext
\startitemize[width=5em]
\item bla
\stopitemize
On Sun, Jan 17 2010, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
That's not the problem, what did not work is
- 'itemalign=...' in combination with 'width=dimen' and
- 'fit' in combination with 'distance=dimen'
Bug or feature? Should we add it to the tracker?
Cheers, Peter
--
Contact information:
Am 17.01.2010 um 16:17 schrieb Peter Münster:
On Sun, Jan 17 2010, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
That's not the problem, what did not work is
- 'itemalign=...' in combination with 'width=dimen' and
- 'fit' in combination with 'distance=dimen'
Bug or feature? Should we add it to the
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi Hans,
the repeat option for itemize is broken.
\starttext
\startitemize[n,repeat]
\item Item 1 \startitemize[a] \item Item 1.a. \item Item 1.b. \stopitemize
\item Item 2 \startitemize[a] \item Item 2.a. \item Item 2.b. \stopitemize
\stopitemize
\stoptext
One
Am 14.12.2009 um 17:28 schrieb Hans Hagen:
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi Hans,
the repeat option for itemize is broken.
\starttext
\startitemize[n,repeat]
\item Item 1 \startitemize[a] \item Item 1.a. \item Item 1.b. \stopitemize
\item Item 2 \startitemize[a] \item Item 2.a. \item Item 2
Hi Hans,
the repeat option for itemize is broken.
\starttext
\startitemize[n,repeat]
\item Item 1 \startitemize[a] \item Item 1.a. \item Item 1.b. \stopitemize
\item Item 2 \startitemize[a] \item Item 2.a. \item Item 2.b. \stopitemize
\stopitemize
\stoptext
One problem can be solved when
Thanks Wolfgang and Luigi. Luigi's solution worked well.
Unfortunately, left={hspace[normal]} did not give the desired outcome.
The item symbols were still at their original location.
I have a follow up question. Based on your solution I also tried
left=\hskip 2.10em, which works too? Is there a
Curiouslearn wrote:
Can someone please say whether it is possible to do what I am trying
to do below?
According to the docs 'margin' should do something, but I am not sure
what and it seems to have no effect over here. You can try if 'width'
does what you want.
Best wishes,
Taco
Thanks.
I suppose you can think of 'margin=dimension' option as increasing the
margin by the specified dimension for the list. It works without any
problems for a list that is not nested within another list. However,
with nesting, as in the example I emailed, it does not work.
I tried the 'width' command
Am 12.12.2009 um 02:22 schrieb Curiouslearn:
I suppose you can think of 'margin=dimension' option as increasing the
margin by the specified dimension for the list. It works without any
problems for a list that is not nested within another list. However,
with nesting, as in the example I
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Curiouslearn curiousle...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone please explain why the margin command does not work in
this example? What can I do to obtain the margin.
Thanks.
\setuppapersize[letter][letter]
\starttext
\input tufte
\startitemize
\item
Can someone please say whether it is possible to do what I am trying
to do below?
Thanks.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Curiouslearn curiousle...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone please explain why the margin command does not work in
this example? What can I do to obtain the margin.
Thanks.
Can someone please explain why the margin command does not work in
this example? What can I do to obtain the margin.
Thanks.
\setuppapersize[letter][letter]
\starttext
\input tufte
\startitemize
\item This is the first item of outer list.
\startitemize[a][stopper=)]
1.tex
Description: Binary data
Hi,
there had been a question on the list from Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky how to get
indented text
inside of itemize and after i spent a few hours on this problem the answer is
it's not possible.
His example (simplified from me) was:
\setupindenting[yes,big
Hello Wolfgang
there had been a question on the list from Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky how to get
indented text
inside of itemize
Thank you very much! It works like charm now.
1) Will this fix be applied to core files?
2) How can I control the distance between the mark and item text? The
space
Am 15.11.2009 um 15:27 schrieb Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky:
2) How can I control the distance between the mark and item text? The space
seems too big.
Use the 'width' and 'distance' keys.
Wolfgang
___
If your
On 15.11.2009 17:08, ntg-context-requ...@ntg.nl wrote:
2) How can I control the distance between the mark and item text? The space
seems too big.
Use the 'width' and 'distance' keys.
Wolfgang
Thank you! Actually, n*serried works excellent, as in my final setup:
Thank you very much, Aditya! I'm glad it is so easy! ))
Change location=serried to location=top. Serried ignores the inbetween
option as it does not make sense with serried.
Vyatcheslav
___
If your question is of
Thank you, Aditya.
Now let me ask you about second big problem with my setup.
I cannot get itemize indent woking properly. I need it be the same as
bodytext indent (starting from the bullet) and the first line indented
too. Please, help me with it.
Vyatcheslav
Change location=serried
Hello,
Another tricky question. I have Review Questions at the end of each
section. There are only questions inside, and they are enumerated.
I felt natural to implement it as description. Going further, I added
\startitemize and \stopitemize inside the description definition. Then
my code
Am 05.11.2009 um 23:27 schrieb Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky:
Unfortunatelly, no. :(
Untested: \setupitemize[each][...][indenting={yes,first,big}]
make a *small* example
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest
Hello list,
The following example from manual works fine with mk II but fails with
mkIV in recent minimals
\starttext
\startitemize[1,packed]
\head supported image formats in \PDFTEX \par
\startitemize[a]
\item png \item eps \item pdf
\stopitemize
\head non supported image
Dear all,
it seems that \sub don't get along very well with the option
continue. At least, the behavior is different in mkii and mkiv.
Check the following example.
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\dorecurse{3}{\item prueba}
\sub prueba
\dorecurse{3}{\item prueba}
\stopitemize
\input tufte
HI ALL!
When using following example in
ConTeXt ver: 2009.09.21 17:39 MKII fmt: 2009.9.21
\starttext
\startitemize[n,packed,broad]
\item first item
\item second item
\item third item
\stopitemize
\stoptext
it works as expected, except for the mysterious warning
pdfTeX warning: pdftex: no
Jan-Erik Hägglöf wrote:
HI ALL!
When using following example in
ConTeXt ver: 2009.09.21 17:39 MKII fmt: 2009.9.21
\starttext
\startitemize[n,packed,broad]
\item first item
\item second item
\item third item
\stopitemize
\stoptext
ok, fixed in upcoming beta
it works as expected, except
Hi Hans,
this is not fixed yet...
Peter Rolf schrieb:
Xan schrieb:
Hi,
I want to start itemize with 2.
I put \startitemize[n][start=2] but it does not work.
third and hopefully last try :D
[strc-itm.mkii]
\def\setitemlevel#1%
{\ifnum\currentitemlevel\zerocount
\settrue
Hello,
I guess again that the following example only breaks on my computer
(this time it's probably true by definition). Any ideas about
circumventing the problem are most welcome (PS: Translate your text
to English is not considered a valid answer :).
\mainlanguage[sl]
\starttext
Mojca Miklavec schrieb:
Hello,
I guess again that the following example only breaks on my computer
(this time it's probably true by definition). Any ideas about
circumventing the problem are most welcome (PS: Translate your text
to English is not considered a valid answer :).
\mainlanguage[sl]
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I guess again that the following example only breaks on my computer
(this time it's probably true by definition). Any ideas about
circumventing the problem are most welcome (PS: Translate your text
to English is not considered a valid answer :).
\mainlanguage[sl]
Xan schrieb:
Hi,
I want to start itemize with 2.
I put \startitemize[n][start=2] but it does not work.
third and hopefully last try :D
[strc-itm.mkii]
\def\setitemlevel#1%
{\ifnum\currentitemlevel\zerocount
\settrue\firstlistitem
%
% \expanded{\setitemparameter
501 - 600 of 852 matches
Mail list logo
