On 9/4/2023 6:12 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Dear list,
after updating to current latest (from 2023.09.03 19:03), packed list
doesn’t seem to work in LMTX:
\starttext
\startTEXpage[offset=1em]
\startitemize[packed]
\item item
\item item
\stopitemize
\stopTEXpage
On 9/4/2023 12:12 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Dear list,
after updating to current latest (from 2023.09.03 19:03), packed list
doesn’t seem to work in LMTX:
\starttext
\startTEXpage[offset=1em]
\startitemize[packed]
\item item
\item item
\stopitemize
\stopTEXpage
Dear list,
after updating to current latest (from 2023.09.03 19:03), packed list
doesn’t seem to work in LMTX:
\starttext
\startTEXpage[offset=1em]
\startitemize[packed]
\item item
\item item
\stopitemize
\stopTEXpage
\stoptext
MkIV gets packed lists just right.
Could anyone
On 9/3/20 8:09 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 9/3/2020 4:52 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> I’m afraid that packed item lists are misbehaving.
>>
>> Could anyone confirm this?
> can you check again (new lmtx)
Many thanks for the new upload, Hans.
Now packed
On 9/3/2020 4:52 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\startitem Item\stopitem
\startitem Item\stopitem
\startitem Item\stopitem
\startitem Item\stopitem
\stopitemize
\startitemize[a, packed
On 9/3/2020 4:52 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\startitem Item\stopitem
\startitem Item\stopitem
\startitem Item\stopitem
\startitem Item\stopitem
\stopitemize
\startitemize[a, packed
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\startitem Item\stopitem
\startitem Item\stopitem
\startitem Item\stopitem
\startitem Item\stopitem
\stopitemize
\startitemize[a, packed]
\startitem Item\stopitem
\startitem Item\stopitem
Mike Cooper schrieb am 01.07.2020 um 22:30:
-Original Message-
From: ntg-context [mailto:ntg-context-boun...@ntg.nl] On Behalf Of Henning
Hraban Ramm
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2020 1:30 PM
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] something between packed and "
> -Original Message-
> From: ntg-context [mailto:ntg-context-boun...@ntg.nl] On Behalf Of Henning
> Hraban Ramm
> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2020 1:30 PM
> To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
> Subject: Re: [NTG-context] something between packed and "small"??
&
inch onto the next page. But
> if I use packed, the list is way too crammed together and there’s about 2.5
> inches of extra space on the page!
>
> How do I go smaller than small? Is there a “lightly packed”? Or other
> degrees?
>
> I’ve tried \blank[1mm] and othe
Me again...
I've got an itemize that needs to fit on one page. I've been using
inbetween={\blank[small]} for all the other analogous lists but this one is
longer and with that spacing, it goes about one inch onto the next page. But
if I use packed, the list is way too crammed together
On 11/14/2019 9:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\starttext
\startitemize[\ifnum\currentnofitems>5 packed\fi]
\dorecurse{7}
{\startitem\currentitemnumber/\currentnofitems\stopitem}
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Is there any
]
{\def\startitem##1\stopitem{\incrementcounter[mycounter]}#1}
\ifnum \rawcountervalue[mycounter]>\rawcountervalue[minforpacked]
\setupitemize[packed]\fi
\startitemize#1\stopitemize}
\starttext
\mystartitemize %normal
\dorecurse{2}{\startitem text\stopitem}
\stopitem
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\starttext
\startitemize[\ifnum\currentnofitems>5 packed\fi]
\dorecurse{7}
{\startitem\currentitemnumber/\currentnofitems\stopitem}
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Is there any way to get a packed list if and only if it contains m
the line with "/,"
Would it be possible that both options were available: packed slashes
and hyphenation after (or before) the slash, both in urls?
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
_
\xmlregistersetup{xml:initialize}
\startxmlsetups xml:ul
\startitemize
\xmlflush{#1}
\stopitemize
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:ul:packed
\startitemize[packed]
\xmlflush{#1}
\stopitemize
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups
On 03/23/2015 01:01 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 3/22/2015 1:39 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
Standard lists are defined in XML code with ul/li/p and packed lists
remove the final /p from the path.
How can I associate the each XML list to its right ConTeXt code?
\startxmlsetups xml:ul
\xmlflush{#1}
\stopitemize
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:ul:packed
\startitemize[packed]
\xmlflush{#1}
\stopitemize
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:li
\startitem
\xmlflush{#1}
\stopitem
On 1/30/2014 1:03 AM, Casey Jones wrote:
The following MWE doesn't print item two when using the packed option
with three columns.
\starttext
% correct
\startitemize[columns, three]
\startitem one \stopitem
\startitem two \stopitem
\startitem three \stopitem
\startitem four \stopitem
\startitem
The following MWE doesn't print item two when using the packed option
with three columns.
\starttext
% correct
\startitemize[columns, three]
\startitem one \stopitem
\startitem two \stopitem
\startitem three \stopitem
\startitem four \stopitem
\startitem five \stopitem
\stopitemize
% item two
Following construction does not work for me.
\setupitemize[each][packed][beforehead={}]
Is there any possibility to suppress the vertical space around \head in
packed itemize?
(latest MKII)
greetings Jan
--
Tato zpráva byla vytvořena převratným poštovním klientem Opery:
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo all!
The following lines demonstrates my problem:
{
\setupspacing[packed]
\startalignment[right]
.
.
.
.
.\space{}
Am 23.02.2009 um 21:52 schrieb Bernd Kosubek:
If I run texexec over this, the last three line are longer
than the first line AND they have the same lengths.
What have I not understand -- or is it a known problem or a
bug?
You get what you write.
2. Sentence: \space{} = 2 spaces because of
the first \space produce NO space (that is not what I wish)
I suppose, that the empty group has no effect.
The following space will be printed and THIS space should be
smaller in an broad-environment if I use \nospace or larger
in an packed-environment if I use \space.
- --
Bernd Kosubek
now one space from the \space command and
another one from the whitespace in the output.
I suppose, that the empty group has no effect.
The following space will be printed and THIS space should be
smaller in an broad-environment if I use \nospace or larger
in an packed-environment if I use \space
in an packed-environment if I use
\space.
You need a empty group to get a space after commands like
\TeX because the command gobbles otherwise all following
whitespace.
Try the following example:
text\relax text\space text\space{}\space{}\space{}\space
text
Wolfgang
Thank you
I
Why does
\setupitemize[packed,paragraph]
ignore the packed option?
Another way would probably be to say
\setupitemize[packed,joinedup],
but I would only like some additional space after the itemization and
none before. \setupitemize[joinedup] produces the same result as
\setupitemize
27 matches
Mail list logo
