Re: [NTG-context] setupnarrower and startnarrower

2013-08-07 Thread Hans Hagen
On 8/6/2013 6:14 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 06.08.2013 um 17:53 schrieb Aditya Mahajan : On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 06.08.2013 um 16:09 schrieb Alan BRASLAU : Thank you Wolfgang, but I was wondering about the standard \

Re: [NTG-context] setupnarrower and startnarrower

2013-08-06 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 06.08.2013 um 17:53 schrieb Aditya Mahajan : On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 06.08.2013 um 16:09 schrieb Alan BRASLAU : Thank you Wolfgang, but I was wondering about the standard \startnarrower. Many (some) commands allow s

Re: [NTG-context] setupnarrower and startnarrower

2013-08-06 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 06.08.2013 um 17:53 schrieb Aditya Mahajan : > On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > >> >> Am 06.08.2013 um 16:09 schrieb Alan BRASLAU : >> >>> Thank you Wolfgang, but I was wondering about the standard \startnarrower. >>> >>> Many (some) commands allow setup assignments, the use

Re: [NTG-context] setupnarrower and startnarrower

2013-08-06 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 06.08.2013 um 16:09 schrieb Alan BRASLAU : Thank you Wolfgang, but I was wondering about the standard \startnarrower. Many (some) commands allow setup assignments, the use of which overides but does not change the default. This is a very usefu

Re: [NTG-context] setupnarrower and startnarrower

2013-08-06 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 06.08.2013 um 16:09 schrieb Alan BRASLAU : > Thank you Wolfgang, but I was wondering about the standard \startnarrower. > > Many (some) commands allow setup assignments, the use of which overides but > does not change the default. This is a very useful feature of ConTeXt that > suggest coul

Re: [NTG-context] setupnarrower and startnarrower

2013-08-06 Thread Alan BRASLAU
Thank you Wolfgang, but I was wondering about the standard \startnarrower. Many (some) commands allow setup assignments, the use of which overides but does not change the default. This is a very useful feature of ConTeXt that suggest could be generalized. \startnarrower is but one example. Alan

Re: [NTG-context] setupnarrower and startnarrower

2013-08-06 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 06.08.2013 um 15:11 schrieb Alan BRASLAU : > Hello, > > Could (should) startnarrower be modified to accept setup assignments? > As in: > > \startnarrower [before=\blank,after=\blank] > > or > > \startnarrower [left=3cm] [left] > > etc. \usemodule[annotation] \defineannotation[NARROW][a

[NTG-context] setupnarrower and startnarrower

2013-08-06 Thread Alan BRASLAU
Hello, Could (should) startnarrower be modified to accept setup assignments? As in: \startnarrower [before=\blank,after=\blank] or \startnarrower [left=3cm] [left] etc. Alan ___ If your question is of interest to

Re: [NTG-context] setupnarrower with em or quad

2006-07-25 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Steffen Wolfrum wrote: > Hi, > > I need a \setupnarrower with quad or em distance. > > > But both... > > \setupnarrower[left=\quad > > and > > \setupnarrower[left=\em > > ... don't work. > > > Someone know

[NTG-context] setupnarrower with em or quad

2006-07-25 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Hi, I need a \setupnarrower with quad or em distance. But both... \setupnarrower[left=\quad and \setupnarrower[left=\em ... don't work. Someone knows the right syntax? Thank you, Steffen ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl