Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
And about the ConTeXt-specific: dcroat and Eth are both already
present in ec encoding, so I'm not asking for any additional glyphs.
It's not OK to use Eth when someone asks for Dcroat (Dstroke), but
it's better than using the improvized (althoug
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
And about the ConTeXt-specific: dcroat and Eth are both already
present in ec encoding, so I'm not asking for any additional glyphs.
It's not OK to use Eth when someone asks for Dcroat (Dstroke), but
it's better than using
Hans Hagen wrote:
if you use regimes:
input encoding font encoding
active char = \namedglyph = 8bit char | fallback
OK, thanks. I didn't check if this works, but I hope the problem will
finally be solved now:
In enco-ec.tex change
\definecharacter dmacron 158
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Another remark. I'm not sure which name is better, dstroke
(unicode-based) or dcroat (adobe-based). ConTeXt seems to have a
strange mixture of unicode- and adobe- based names. hungarumlaut is
adobe-based, while diaeresis is unicode-based for example. I don't
want to
Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Another remark. I'm not sure which name is better, dstroke
(unicode-based) or dcroat (adobe-based). ConTeXt seems to have a
strange mixture of unicode- and adobe- based names. hungarumlaut is
adobe-based, while diaeresis is unicode-based for example.
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Another remark. I'm not sure which name is better, dstroke
(unicode-based) or dcroat (adobe-based). ConTeXt seems to have a
strange mixture of unicode- and adobe- based names. hungarumlaut is
adobe-based, while diaeresis is unicode-based for example. I don't
want to
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Out of the seven possibilities I vote for \dstroke and leave the
strange name (dcroat) to be handled by *.enc files only.
i think that your ultimate satisfaction can come from this private regime:
\starttext
\startregime[mojka]
\dostepwiserecurse{127}{255}{1}
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Guess why dstroke/dcroat is named dbar in the ec encoding ...
guess: because no one was involved who knew better than that
And I forgot yet another possibility in my list of names for that
single stupid letter that seems to be used nowhere except in Croatian
and
Hi Jacko,
There is some confusion about tcaron. The problem si that when another
name is used, am2tfm cannot create proper small caps when there is no
matching upper/lowercase slot.
What do you advice in this. Should the ec enc file be changed?
Hans
Hans Hagen wrote:
well, since mojca want some additional glyphs as well, why not make an
ecx.enc file that fixes these things; actually, you only need that file for
generating metrics and rename the ecx-* files to ec-* afterwards; we can
tweak texfotn to use a different encoding name and
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
And about the ConTeXt-specific: dcroat and Eth are both already
present in ec encoding, so I'm not asking for any additional glyphs.
It's not OK to use Eth when someone asks for Dcroat (Dstroke), but
it's better than using the improvized (althoug corrected) version,
11 matches
Mail list logo
