Re: [NTG-context] [ at beginning of formula ?

Title: Re: [NTG-context] [ at beginning of formula ? At 15:29 -0500 16/11/04, Matthias Weber wrote: Hello, I'd like to typeset [\partial,B]=0 Hi Matthias, Despite Hans' suggestion of putting \relax in front of [, in my installation of ConTeXt this works well: \starttext \startformula 0

Re: [NTG-context] [ at beginning of formula ?

Hi Otared, the actual problem arises with \starttext \startformula [A,B] =0. \stopformula \stoptext or, even worse, with \starttext \startformula [\partial,B] =0. \stopformula \stoptext Hans' solution is to use \relax whenever one has a [ at the beginning of a formula: \starttext

Re: [NTG-context] [ at beginning of formula ?

At 7:57 -0500 17/11/04, Matthias Weber wrote: Hi Otared, the actual problem arises with \starttext \startformula [A,B] =0. \stopformula \stoptext or, even worse, with \starttext \startformula [\partial,B] =0. \stopformula \stoptext Hi Matthias, Yes are right, indeed... However I tried the

[NTG-context] [ at beginning of formula ?

Hello, I'd like to typeset [\partial,B]=0 but \starttext \placeformula \startformula 0= [ A ,B ] = 0 \stopformula gives just =0 (see below) while \stoptext \starttext \placeformula \startformula 0= [ A ,B ] \stopformula \stoptext works. What is the meaning of [ at the beginning of a formula,

Re: [NTG-context] [ at beginning of formula ?

Matthias Weber wrote: Hello, I'd like to typeset [\partial,B]=0 but \starttext \placeformula \startformula 0= [ A ,B ] = 0 \stopformula gives just =0 (see below) while \stoptext \starttext \placeformula \startformula 0= [ A ,B ] \stopformula \stoptext works. What is the meaning of [ at the

Re: [NTG-context] [ at beginning of formula ?

Thanks! Matthias On Nov 16, 2004, at 4:26 PM, h h extern wrote: Matthias Weber wrote: Hello, I'd like to typeset [\partial,B]=0 but \starttext \placeformula \startformula 0= [ A ,B ] = 0 \stopformula gives just =0 (see below) while \stoptext \starttext \placeformula \startformula 0= [ A ,B ]