Re: [NTG-context] OT: mupdf 1.14

2018-10-09 Thread luigi scarso
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 5:01 PM Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > On 10/9/18 7:19 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > > https://mupdf.com > > > > The basic viewer mupdf-gl has now a minimal UI interface and an add > > annotation mode ('a') . > > The mutool show command line tool is useful to inspect pdf . > > I’m

Re: [NTG-context] OT: mupdf 1.14

2018-10-09 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 10/9/18 7:19 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > https://mupdf.com > > The basic viewer mupdf-gl has now a minimal UI interface and  an add > annotation mode ('a') . > The mutool show command line tool is useful to inspect pdf . I’m experiencing a weird issue with mupdf-1.14. According to

Re: [NTG-context] OT: mupdf 1.14

2018-10-09 Thread Hans Hagen
On 10/9/2018 1:36 PM, Procházka Lukáš Ing. wrote: Hello Luigi, BTW, I have problem converting/compressing a scanned ~.pdf (~77 kB; of course, I have some bigger PDFs) via: mutool.exe convert -F pdf -O resolution=150,compress-images -o ~~.pdf ~.pdf - The mutool.exe crashes (here on

Re: [NTG-context] OT: mupdf 1.14

2018-10-09 Thread luigi scarso
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 1:33 PM Procházka Lukáš Ing. wrote: > Hello Luigi, > > BTW, I have problem converting/compressing a scanned ~.pdf (~77 kB; of > course, I have some bigger PDFs) via: > > mutool.exe convert -F pdf -O resolution=150,compress-images -o > ~~.pdf ~.pdf > > - The

Re: [NTG-context] OT: mupdf 1.14

2018-10-09 Thread Procházka Lukáš Ing .
Hello Luigi, BTW, I have problem converting/compressing a scanned ~.pdf (~77 kB; of course, I have some bigger PDFs) via: mutool.exe convert -F pdf -O resolution=150,compress-images -o ~~.pdf ~.pdf - The mutool.exe crashes (here on Win7 64b). (Is my understanding of mutool command

[NTG-context] OT: mupdf 1.14

2018-10-08 Thread luigi scarso
https://mupdf.com The basic viewer mupdf-gl has now a minimal UI interface and an add annotation mode ('a' ) . The mutool show command line tool is useful to inspect pdf . -- luigi ___ If your question is of

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] mupdf

2009-07-24 Thread luigi scarso
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote: On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, luigi scarso wrote: http://ccxvii.net/mupdf/ It seems a valid alternative to xpdf Minimal and fast... but file reload does not seem possible, so not useful in a normal TeX workflow. C code

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] mupdf

2009-07-24 Thread Taco Hoekwater
luigi scarso wrote: On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu mailto:adit...@umich.edu wrote: On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, luigi scarso wrote: http://ccxvii.net/mupdf/ It seems a valid alternative to xpdf Minimal and fast... but file

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] mupdf

2009-07-24 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Taco Hoekwater wrote: The more serious problem is that it does not interaction objects at all, not even bookmarks or hyperlinks. Oops sorry, it does indeed do in-document hyperlinks. ___ If your question is

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] mupdf

2009-07-24 Thread luigi scarso
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote: Taco Hoekwater wrote: The more serious problem is that it does not interaction objects at all, not even bookmarks or hyperlinks. Oops sorry, it does indeed do in-document hyperlinks.

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] mupdf

2009-07-24 Thread Yue Wang
well, so maybe there can be a luatex binding to replace original xpdf? and we can remove cpp code completely in LuaTeX... (and that enable the plan 9 guys to compile luatex on those exotic systems.) On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 6:08 PM, luigi scarsoluigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 24, 2009

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] mupdf

2009-07-24 Thread luigi scarso
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Yue Wang yuleo...@gmail.com wrote: well, so maybe there can be a luatex binding to replace original xpdf? and we can remove cpp code completely in LuaTeX... (and that enable the plan 9 guys to compile luatex on those exotic systems.) until know, the most

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] mupdf

2009-07-24 Thread Martin Schröder
2009/7/24 Yue Wang yuleo...@gmail.com: well, so maybe there can be a luatex binding to replace original xpdf? Not yet. And mupdf isn't what I'm looking at. GNUPF... Best Martin ___ If your question is of interest

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] mupdf

2009-07-23 Thread Hans Hagen
luigi scarso wrote: http://ccxvii.net/mupdf/ It seems a valid alternative to xpdf kde okular is quite nice (runs also on windows) although i can't start it up from the editor Hans -

[NTG-context] [OT] mupdf

2009-07-22 Thread luigi scarso
http://ccxvii.net/mupdf/ It seems a valid alternative to xpdf -- luigi ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] mupdf

2009-07-22 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, luigi scarso wrote: http://ccxvii.net/mupdf/ It seems a valid alternative to xpdf Minimal and fast... but file reload does not seem possible, so not useful in a normal TeX workflow. Aditya