Re: [NTG-context] \starbuffer in own macros

2009-10-19 Thread Andreas Harder
Am 19.10.2009 um 00:50 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:Am 18.10.2009 um 12:02 schrieb Andreas Harder:Before I help you provide us with more information, e.g. should the text in the bufferappear also in the complete text or do you it only in the snippet?Sorry, that I did not make myself clear. The real

Re: [NTG-context] \starbuffer in own macros

2009-10-19 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 19.10.2009 um 16:13 schrieb Andreas Harder: There is an inherent problem as one can see in the attachment, but since mostly I cite a whole paragraph it's not a real problem. This happens when you start in the middle of a paragraph/line which results in different line breaking. I

Re: [NTG-context] \starbuffer in own macros

2009-10-19 Thread Andreas Harder
Am 19.10.2009 um 17:53 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: Am 19.10.2009 um 16:13 schrieb Andreas Harder: There is an inherent problem as one can see in the attachment, but since mostly I cite a whole paragraph it's not a real problem. This happens when you start in the middle of a paragraph/line

Re: [NTG-context] \starbuffer in own macros

2009-10-18 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 17.10.2009 um 22:29 schrieb Andreas Harder: Hi all, now that \inline[ref] etc. work—whereas in the case of \someline [ref] \inline[ref] always jumps to the else-branch of its definition and outputs the same line twice—I tried, obviously naive, to realize the following functionality

Re: [NTG-context] \starbuffer in own macros

2009-10-18 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 18.10.2009 um 12:02 schrieb Andreas Harder: Before I help you provide us with more information, e.g. should the text in the buffer appear also in the complete text or do you it only in the snippet? Sorry, that I did not make myself clear. The real setup is: I've a lot of line numbered

[NTG-context] \starbuffer in own macros

2009-10-17 Thread Andreas Harder
Hi all, now that \inline[ref] etc. work—whereas in the case of \someline[ref] \inline[ref] always jumps to the else-branch of its definition and outputs the same line twice—I tried, obviously naive, to realize the following functionality (attachment). test-linenumbering4.tex Description: