Hi Mikael,
Thanks for your reply.
Indeed with your hint the issue disappears.
I’ll change my definition…
Best regards: Otared
> On 2 Nov 2022, at 21:44, Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context
> wrote:
> […]
> I think in this case it is better to use a mathsimplealign instead of a
> matrix.
>
>
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 9:19 PM Otared Kavian via ntg-context
wrote:
>
> Dear Jeong,
>
> Thanks for testing my example, and pointing to the solution using \dm (which
> I didn’t know…).
> I think the correct behaviour of math alignments should avoid using
> additional commands such as \dm.
>
Dear Jeong,
Thanks for testing my example, and pointing to the solution using \dm (which I
didn’t know…).
I think the correct behaviour of math alignments should avoid using additional
commands such as \dm.
We’ll see what Hans and Mikael say.
Best regards: OK
> On 2 Nov 2022, at 12:53, Jeong
Dear Otared,
>
> I think there is an issue with the size of math fonts in \frac when used in
> math alignments, as it is is shown in the following example.
>
I confirm what you said.
However, if I use \dm{} instead of \displaystyle as following, then the output
is correct.
\placeformula
Hi Hans and Mikael,
I think there is an issue with the size of math fonts in \frac when used in
math alignments, as it is is shown in the following example.
%% begin bug-mathalignment.tex
\definemathmatrix[alignedcases]
[align={1:right,2:left,3:left},
distance=3pt,
