Re: [NTG-context] Context Garden, wiki not accesable

2006-03-13 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 04:22:19PM -0500, Jeffrey Drake said that You definitely haven't seen our network administators. The proxy we run: Generated by squid/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This version is from 1997 at best. Not many people have a great deal of faith in them. there are quite a few

Re: [NTG-context] Context Garden, wiki not accesable

2006-03-10 Thread Geert Stappers
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 01:10:48AM -0500, Jeffrey Drake wrote: Is there any downloadable copy of the Context Garden site that is not on the Context Garden website? At my school unfortunately we don't seem to be able to get through to context garden wiki. But trying to get into ConTeXt would

Re: [NTG-context] Context Garden, wiki not accesable

2006-03-10 Thread Jeffrey Drake
This is what is returned from the proxy: ERROR The requested URL could not be retrieved While trying to retrieve the URL: http://www.contextgarden.net/ The following error was encountered: * DNS name lookup failure The system returned: DNS Domain 'www.contextgarden.net' is invalid:

Re: [NTG-context] Context Garden, wiki not accesable

2006-03-10 Thread Jeffrey Drake
I have no understanding of what the problem is to know even what to say to the network guys. Could you possibly put forth some hints about possibilities? Is it any coincidence that gnustep.org and contextgarden.net are both unaccessible? Regards, Jeff On 3/10/06, Geert Stappers [EMAIL

Re: [NTG-context] Context Garden, wiki not accesable

2006-03-10 Thread Geert Stappers
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:04:04PM -0500, Jeffrey Drake wrote: On 3/10/06, Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 01:04:17PM -0500, Jeffrey Drake wrote: On 3/10/06, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jeffrey Drake wrote: DNS Domain

Re: [NTG-context] Context Garden, wiki not accesable

2006-03-10 Thread Jeffrey Drake
You definitely haven't seen our network administators. The proxy we run: Generated by squid/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This version is from 1997 at best. Not many people have a great deal of faith in them. - Jeff On 3/10/06, Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:04:04PM