On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 23:12:16 +0100
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
feel free to organize that ... i have no time for it
I have started a new wiki page and invite other users to contribute to
the list by including *their* favorite common mistakes.
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Common_errors
What do you think about a wiki structure that directly corresponds to errors?
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Errors/tex/1
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Errors/context/1
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Errors/metapost/1
When ConTeXt encounters a TeX error, the software writes the error
Hi,
After upgrading to version 2014.10.07, I recompiled a document that
had gathered some dust and was greeted with:
tex error error on line 34 in file ...: ! Math error: parameter
\Umathquad\displaystyle is not set
The document compiled using a previous version, and no changes were
made prior
On 10/26/2014 8:44 PM, Thangalin wrote:
Hi,
After upgrading to version 2014.10.07, I recompiled a document that
had gathered some dust and was greeted with:
tex error error on line 34 in file ...: ! Math error: parameter
\Umathquad\displaystyle is not set
The document compiled using a
Hello,
Here a patch for luat-cbk.lua:
function callbacks.register(name,func,freeze)
if frozen[name] then
if trace_callbacks then
frozenmessage(registering,name)
end
return nil, name .. is frozen
elseif freeze then
frozen[name] = (type(freeze)
Greetings all,
I'm a LaTeXer who is intrigued by ConTeXt. I'm running Mac OS 10.3,
using Gerben Wierda's i-Installer, and have been receiving some error
messages with my first attempts that a little searching-around haven't
been clarified. Without the latest ConTeXt update from the i-Installer,
Hi,
How about:
mkdir ($FormatPath) ;
(I cannot test, I do not have a perl that is sufficiently antique to test this)
ab wrote:
and I still get the error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 62% texexec 041121_table.tex
Not enough arguments for mkdir at /usr/people/pm/bin/texexec line 2259,
near $FormatPath
Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
How about:
mkdir ($FormatPath) ;
(I cannot test, I do not have a perl that is sufficiently antique to
test this)
Hi,
I modified texexec.pl per your suggestion and continue to get the same
error message:
Not enough arguments for
ab wrote:
Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
How about:
mkdir ($FormatPath) ;
(I cannot test, I do not have a perl that is sufficiently antique to
test this)
Hi,
I modified texexec.pl per your suggestion and continue to get the same
error message:
Not enough arguments for
Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
can't you update you rperl to 5.8+?
thanks, sorry for the trouble, I'll look into it
--
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
ab wrote:
Willi Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TEXEXEC is way too old. The current version is above 5!
After updating your context it appears that it uses still a very
outdated version of texexec. I advise you to update your tex-system
from CTAN (http://www.tug.org/interest.html).
Hi, I am
ab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% texexec 041120_testfile.tex
Not enough arguments for mkdir at /usr/people/pm/bin/texexec line 2259,
near $FormatPath ;
Can you given us the output perl -v ?
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% texexec 041120_testfile.tex
Not enough arguments for mkdir at /usr/people/pm/bin/texexec line 2259,
near $FormatPath ;
Can you given us the output perl -v ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 39% perl -V
Summary of my perl5 (5.0
I believe it is possible that this code
if ($UseEnginePath ($FormatPath ne '' ($FormatPath !~
/$EnginePath\/$/))) {
$FormatPath .= $EnginePath . '/' ;
unless (-d $FormatPath) {
mkdir $FormatPath ;
}
}
breaks in perl versions 5.8.0
h h extern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ab wrote:
Willi Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TEXEXEC is way too old. The current version is above 5!
After updating your context it appears that it uses still a very
outdated version of texexec. I advise you to update your tex-system
from CTAN
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
I believe it is possible that this code
if ($UseEnginePath ($FormatPath ne '' ($FormatPath !~
/$EnginePath\/$/))) {
$FormatPath .= $EnginePath . '/' ;
unless (-d $FormatPath) {
mkdir $FormatPath ;
}
}
breaks in perl versions
Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
ah, thanks for looking into it, i changed the code to:
if ($UseEnginePath ($FormatPath ne '' ($FormatPath !~
/$EnginePath\/$/))) {
$FormatPath .= $EnginePath ;
unless (-d $FormatPath) {
mkdir $FormatPath ;
Willi Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TEXEXEC is way too old. The current version is above 5!
After updating your context it appears that it uses still a very
outdated version of texexec. I advise you to update your tex-system
from CTAN (http://www.tug.org/interest.html).
Hi, I am trying to
Ciro A. Soto wrote:
I think TEXEXEC 3.1 is still the latest version. what are new are the
you're kidding, i have:
texexec
TeXExec 5.2.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2004
--help overview of all options and their values
--help all all about all options
Have a look at this (Well its about XP) .. But who knows, it could help :=)
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20041115.161341.884a23e7.html
In fact it is a kind of complete distribution that handles Context ..
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL
I thinkTEXEXEC 3.1 is still the latest version. what are neware the context macros.
ciroWilli Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,The delivered TeX distributions with Linux are mostly way too old. If you look at the messages given by your texexec run you can see it already.TEXEXEC is way too old.
This is what I get after I followed the installation manual and the wiki.
I did generated all formats.
I'd appreciate any suggestion. thanks
ciro
===
texexec --pdf novel.tex
TeXExec 3.1 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2002
executable :
Hi,
The delivered TeX distributions with Linux are mostly way too old. If
you look at the messages given by your texexec run you can see it already.
TEXEXEC is way too old. The current version is above 5!
After updating your context it appears that it uses still a very
outdated version of
23 matches
Mail list logo
