On 4-1-2011 3:19, Cedric Mauclair wrote:
I am pretty sure there is a better way to do it, but adding
\handleplaceformulanumbering after \stopcases works.
Maybe Aditya can check (expected) behaviour.
Hans
-
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 16:00, Cedric Mauclair cedric.maucl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Maybe someone had the same problem, no ?
Best regards.
-- Cédric
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 09:19, Cedric Mauclair
cedric.maucl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 16:45, Cedric Mauclair
Hi,
Maybe someone had the same problem, no ?
Best regards.
-- Cédric
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 09:19, Cedric Mauclair
cedric.maucl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 16:45, Cedric Mauclair
cedric.maucl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list,
How can I get a numbered equation when using
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 16:45, Cedric Mauclair
cedric.maucl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list,
How can I get a numbered equation when using cases in MkIV? The hack
proposed by Aditya in [1] doesn't work as it uses macros that no
longer exist (\makesesctionnumber and others). The reference doesn't
Hi list,
How can I get a numbered equation when using cases in MkIV? The hack
proposed by Aditya in [1] doesn't work as it uses macros that no
longer exist (\makesesctionnumber and others). The reference doesn't
even get recorded. I precise that I don't want (well, don't need) the
sub numbering
