Am Freitag, den 21.10.2011, 18:08 +0200 schrieb Peter Rolf:
Am 21.10.2011 17:26, schrieb Paul Menzel:
Am Freitag, den 21.10.2011, 17:02 +0200 schrieb Peter Rolf:
I agree, this is confusing on the first sight. But scaling is not meant
as 'scaling to' a dimension. In fact is is just a
Am 23.10.2011 16:12, schrieb Paul Menzel:
Am Freitag, den 21.10.2011, 18:08 +0200 schrieb Peter Rolf:
Am 21.10.2011 17:26, schrieb Paul Menzel:
Am Freitag, den 21.10.2011, 17:02 +0200 schrieb Peter Rolf:
I agree, this is confusing on the first sight. But scaling is not meant
as 'scaling
On 23-10-2011 17:17, Peter Rolf wrote:
If I want to test the bounding box of a graphic, I normally use a small
debugging macro (last code line of nearly all of my graphics). It simply
draws a small red frame at the bounding box borders. You can use the
'Measuring Tool' in Acrobat (also Reader?)
Dear Peter,
thank you for your answer.
Am Freitag, den 21.10.2011, 17:02 +0200 schrieb Peter Rolf:
I agree, this is confusing on the first sight. But scaling is not meant
as 'scaling to' a dimension. In fact is is just a simple multiplication.
The reason why it seems to work this way with
Am 21.10.2011 17:26, schrieb Paul Menzel:
Dear Peter,
thank you for your answer.
Am Freitag, den 21.10.2011, 17:02 +0200 schrieb Peter Rolf:
I agree, this is confusing on the first sight. But scaling is not meant
as 'scaling to' a dimension. In fact is is just a simple multiplication.