Re: [NTG-context] Referencing equation, missing dot

2019-11-14 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11/13/2019 9:20 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: Hi, The following example used to work. But with an LMTX updated today, the numbering \eqref produces is (11) instead of the expected (1.1). The numbering in the equation itself is fine. Did something change on purpose? /Mikael %%% TEST

[NTG-context] Referencing equation, missing dot

2019-11-13 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
Hi, The following example used to work. But with an LMTX updated today, the numbering \eqref produces is (11) instead of the expected (1.1). The numbering in the equation itself is fine. Did something change on purpose? /Mikael %%% TEST FILE \definereferenceformat[eqref][left=(,right=)]