Re: [NTG-context] Spacing in \unit - degrees

2022-10-13 Thread Alan Braslau via ntg-context
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 21:14:52 -0600 Gavin wrote: > As a recovering string theorist, I cannot help but speculate that > this rule extends to spherical coordinates in any number of > dimensions. However, if you don’t want the space, you can use > 135\unit{℃}, which does not add a space. Will

Re: [NTG-context] Spacing in \unit - degrees

2022-10-12 Thread Gavin via ntg-context
Hi Alan > On Oct 12, 2022, at 5:55 PM, Alan Braslau via ntg-context > wrote: > > \unit{135℃} adds a space after the digits 135. > I do not believe that this is correct > (for ℃ is *not* a "real" unit, unlike \unit{408.15 K} which *is* a real > unit). According to “Scientific Style and Format:

Re: [NTG-context] Spacing in \unit - degrees

2022-10-12 Thread Alan Braslau via ntg-context
Further \unit question(s): \unit{135℃} adds a space after the digits 135. I do not believe that this is correct (for ℃ is *not* a "real" unit, unlike \unit{408.15 K} which *is* a real unit). Also, \unit{135°C} drops the "C". Is this a parsing bug? Related, \unit{90°} does not seem to introduce