On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 11:22:26AM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
> we are waiting for you to predict the future, when do you think nofemoji
> will pass nofnonemoji (we could draw a curve of how much got added each
> version of unicode) .. visualizing your argument could help
It’s never going to
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:47:46AM +0100, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> I’m aware, just joking around.
It was hard to tell.
> But we get new emojis all the time but AFAIK there are still
> characters/glyphs or whole scripting systems missing.
You do realise that it’s not the same people
On 2/5/2020 10:45 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Oh yes, I didn’t think of that. You don’t need a ligature for software cheats,
though, they’re default.
But if combustion engines get prohibited, does that affect the emojis?
they will be kept (like ancient scripts are supported)
actually
On 2/5/2020 10:37 AM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 09:45:09AM +0100, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Hi, I’m a bit late: Last week the Unicode consortium released the latest
version of their nowadays mostly-emoji standard.
Just for the record: it is not true at all that
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 10:38 AM Arthur Reutenauer <
arthur.reutena...@normalesup.org> wrote:
>
> Just for the record: it is not true at all that Unicode is “mostly
> emojis” nowadays. Even today, the vast majority of characters added
> each year is 90% non-emoji. I make this point at every
> Am 2020-02-05 um 10:37 schrieb Arthur Reutenauer
> :
>
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 09:45:09AM +0100, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
>> Hi, I’m a bit late: Last week the Unicode consortium released the latest
>> version of their nowadays mostly-emoji standard.
>
> Just for the record: it is not
> Am 2020-02-05 um 10:29 schrieb Hans Hagen :
>
> On 2/5/2020 9:45 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
>> Hi, I’m a bit late: Last week the Unicode consortium released the latest
>> version of their nowadays mostly-emoji standard.
>> Besides several entries for transgender representation, there are
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 09:45:09AM +0100, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Hi, I’m a bit late: Last week the Unicode consortium released the latest
> version of their nowadays mostly-emoji standard.
Just for the record: it is not true at all that Unicode is “mostly
emojis” nowadays. Even today,
On 2/5/2020 9:45 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Hi, I’m a bit late: Last week the Unicode consortium released the latest
version of their nowadays mostly-emoji standard.
Besides several entries for transgender representation, there are also new
animals, and most important: “my” ConTeXt
Hi, I’m a bit late: Last week the Unicode consortium released the latest
version of their nowadays mostly-emoji standard.
Besides several entries for transgender representation, there are also new
animals, and most important: “my” ConTeXt mascot, the Dodo! ;D
see
10 matches
Mail list logo
