Thank VERY much,
Taco.
Do you recomand to substitute any $$ i \index with \mathematics?
Regards,
Xan.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist :
En/na Xan ha escrit:
Thank VERY much,
Taco.
Do you recomand to substitute any $$ i \index with \mathematics?
Regards,
Xan.
Sorry Taco, Bad news. It does not work: the same problem
Xan.
___
If your question is
En/na Xan ha escrit:
En/na Xan ha escrit:
Thank VERY much,
Taco.
Do you recomand to substitute any $$ i \index with \mathematics?
Regards,
Xan.
Sorry Taco, Bad news. It does not work: the same problem
Xan.
Even with no math I get the same error:
\startmydefinition Siguin $G$ un grup,
Xan wrote:
If I comment this code, then all is ok.
Can you see all the code and take a sight if you detect the error?
Perhaps an older run is interfering (stuff still in the .tuc file).
After all, if there is no math, there should not be a math error either.
Can you delete the .tuc file
Yes, Taco. With all files except source file deleted, and \mathematics
instead of $$ \index works.
Is it any know bug or so? Why is the reason of that?. Just curious.
Xan.
___
If your question is of interest to
Xan wrote:
Yes, Taco. With all files except source file deleted, and \mathematics
instead of $$ \index works.
Is it any know bug or so? Why is the reason of that?. Just curious.
there will no new tuc file made when you have a 'fatal' error; normally
that works out ok, unless there is a
Xan wrote:
/ Yes, Taco. With all files except source file deleted, and \mathematics
// instead of $$ \index works.
//
// Is it any know bug or so? Why is the reason of that?. Just curious.
/
there will no new tuc file made when you have a 'fatal' error; normally
that works out ok, unless
Xan wrote:
Xan wrote:
/ Yes, Taco. With all files except source file deleted, and \mathematics
// instead of $$ \index works.
// // Is it any know bug or so? Why is the reason of that?. Just
curious.
/
there will no new tuc file made when you have a 'fatal' error;
normally that works out
Hi Hans,
Hans Hagen wrote:
I was refering to what \mathematics works and $$ does not.
there are only a few cases where $$ (in the sense of empty inline math)
works ok so best use $ $ then; \mathematics does this automatically
You should go back in the thread a bit. It looks like Xan's
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi Hans,
Hans Hagen wrote:
I was refering to what \mathematics works and $$ does not.
there are only a few cases where $$ (in the sense of empty inline
math) works ok so best use $ $ then; \mathematics does this automatically
You should go back in the thread a bit.
Hi Xan,
I forwarded your 'complete' document to myself but count not
run it at all (my pgf is too old, I guess). At a guess, and
especially because you said it is urgent, you could try this
for the offending \index entry:
\index
[amplada+mitjana respecte de k+1 valors]
{amplada+mitjan
En/na Xan ha escrit:
Hi,
I have a document and I get this error:
publications: warning: cite argument riley-tesi unknown on 139
references : unknown reference [][0]
section : 1.4 Més d'una secció
section : 1.5 $p_w$
section : 1.6 altres
{vertical mode:
12 matches
Mail list logo
