Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :
Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
The problem is only with Lucida fonts.
___
If your question is
Le 29 août 08 à 08:59, Wolfgang Schuster a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :
Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
The problem is
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :
Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
The problem is only with Lucida fonts.
This is *not* Latin/Computer
Allright, I'm not a font expert.
Here is what I get when I disable
\def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{0.920}}
\def\LBRBig {\@@dobig{1.080}}
\def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{1.342}}
\def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{1.603}}
\def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{1.772}}
\def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{2.125}}
:
Oh, My God~
Make sure your font
This is of course Lucida Expert fonts.
(The quality of the image is not so good, because I cannot upload
large attachments. that's it.)
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :
Are you sure? see the first line of the
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :
Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
The problem is only with Lucida fonts.
This
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :
Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
It seems that the text you
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Yue Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight.
s/sent/send/g
btw, Taco, the attachment restriction (40k) is too stirct...
t.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
t.tex
Description: TeX document
OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 29 août
Hi,
Yue Wang wrote:
This is of course Lucida Expert fonts.
(The quality of the image is not so good, because I cannot upload
large attachments. that's it.)
What does your typescript look like? Lucida Expert may not be the
same as the Lucida Bright fonts from TUG (previously YandY).
Best
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with
lucida.
I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says
**
\def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{8.20}}
\def\LBRBig
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Yue Wang wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Yue Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight.
s/sent/send/g
Thank you. Now I no longer understand why Eric got wrong output :(
btw, Taco, the attachment restriction (40k) is too stirct...
I
There is one possible condition:
He failed to install the math part of the lucida font (either pfbs or tfms) .
and then to some unknown reasons
ConTeXt switch to the Latin Modern Font.
But it still use value like 8.20 (defined in math-lbr) instead of 0.85
(defined in plain TeX, core-mat and
Yue Wang wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Yue Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight.
s/sent/send/g
Thank you. Now I no longer understand why Eric got wrong output :(
btw, Taco, the attachment restriction (40k) is too stirct...
I do not think we can enlarge
Le 29 août 08 à 12:00, Yue Wang a écrit :
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with
lucida.
I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says
**
oh, I made a another mistake. I mean __complete__ set (not basic set)
font from TUG:)
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Yue Wang wrote:
This is of course Lucida Expert fonts.
(The quality of the image is not so good, because I cannot upload
large
Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with
lucida.
I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says
**
Hello
The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with
lucida.
I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says
**
\def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{8.20}}
\def\LBRBig {\@@dobig{10.80}}
\def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{13.42}}
\def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{16.03}}
18 matches
Mail list logo
