Dear list,
using the latest beta (it also happens with ConTeXt from TL 2013), I
don’t get the space in \type{\em #1}.
Here you have a minimal sample that shows the difference with other
verbatim commands:
\starttext
\type{\em #1}
\arg{\em #1}
\starttyping\em #1\stoptyping
On 28-9-2010 2:38, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
There is a bug in buff-ver.mkiv. Minimal example:
\starttext
\type+\test{+
\stoptext
fixed in next beta
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Hi,
There is a bug in buff-ver.mkiv. Minimal example:
\starttext
\type+\test{+
\stoptext
gives
Runaway argument?
\stoptext
! File ended while scanning use of \dodotypeDD.
system error on line 0 in file : File ended while scanning use
of \dodotypeDD ...
empty file
inserted text
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
Question for taco: can we make such spaces optionally disappear in future
tex's?
In most cases, yes.
(but not always, because something like the internal form of
\aacute a can not reliably be represented by adding extra
tokens like in
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Isn't \type.. be supposed to be equivalent to \type{..} ?
\title{some \type{thing} }
works perfectly but
\title{some \typething}
will not work in commands that get an argument because
Hans Hagen wrote:
Question for taco: can we make such spaces optionally disappear in future
tex's?
In most cases, yes.
(but not always, because something like the internal form of
\aacute a can not reliably be represented by adding extra
tokens like in \aacute{}a, for example)
Taco
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Isn't \type.. be supposed to be equivalent to \type{..} ?
\title{some \type{thing} }
works perfectly but
\title{some \typething}
will not work in commands
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Isn't \type.. be supposed to be equivalent to \type{..} ?
\title{some \type{thing} }
works perfectly but
Actually this does not work as expected. The font does not change to
monotype. Is that delebrate?
Aditya
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Isn't \type.. be supposed to be equivalent to \type{..} ?
\title{some \type{thing} }
works perfectly but
\title{some \typething}
will not work in commands that get an argument because it is
related to catcode changes
we could use \scantokens if there was not
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Isn't \type.. be supposed to be equivalent to \type{..} ?
\title{some \type{thing} }
works perfectly but
Actually this does not work as expected. The font does not change to
monotype. Is that delebrate?
no, a
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Isn't \type.. be supposed to be equivalent to \type{..} ?
\title{some \type{thing} }
works perfectly but
Actually this does not work as expected. The font does not change to
monotype. Is that delebrate?
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Isn't \type.. be supposed to be equivalent to \type{..} ?
\title{some \type{thing} }
works perfectly but
Actually this does not work as expected. The font does not change to
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Isn't \type.. be supposed to be equivalent to \type{..} ?
\title{some \type{thing} }
works perfectly but
\title{some \typething}
will not work in commands that get an argument because it is
related to catcode changes
Ah.
13 matches
Mail list logo
