Actually it was not the gap that bothered me. You are right, DIN 676 B says
45mm. But this seems to be useless as all window envelopes (that I possess)
have their window at 50mm. It defeats the purpose of the backaddress field,
which is hidden by the DIN layout. Shouldn't they be able to
Dear Wolfgang,
the default vertical placement of the backaddress is to high in dinb.nls.
When I change the offset from
\c!voffset=\dimexpr\letterstylevalue{\v!address\v!layer}\c!voffset-\letterstylevalue{\v!backaddress\v!frame}\c!height\relax]
to
Am 28.10.2010 um 19:04 schrieb Florian Wobbe:
Dear Wolfgang,
the default vertical placement of the backaddress is to high in dinb.nls.
The position of the backaddress os correct but i think you don’t like the large
gap between the backaddress and the address. The gap is there because it’s
On Oct 28, 2010, at 21:11 , Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 28.10.2010 um 19:04 schrieb Florian Wobbe:
Dear Wolfgang,
the default vertical placement of the backaddress is to high in dinb.nls.
The position of the backaddress os correct but i think you don’t like the
large gap between the
