[NTG-context] LuaTeX 1.18.0

The upcoming version 1.18.0 has some changes that are not compatible with previous versions but should only apply in kpse mode: 1) the debug library is disabled; can be enabled with --luadebug 2) os.rename os.remove and lfs library functions are checked from kpse to see if the path is legal I'm

[NTG-context] Luatex 1.17.0 announcement.

(Sorry for the delay, I wanted to be sure that building phase was over) == LuaTeX 1.17.0 2023-04-29 == - A breaking backward compatibility change: by default the socket

[NTG-context] Luatex 1.15.0 announcement.

== LuaTeX 1.15.0 2021-12-31 == New primitive \matheqdirmode. By default the short skip detection is not adapted to r2l typesetting and that hasn't been the case since the start

Re: [NTG-context] --luatex option failing

On 5/28/21 12:00 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 5/28/2021 11:40 AM, jbf wrote: >> [...] >> As this may be an 'ignorant' kind of question, something I should really >> know but don't, about paths and permissions, there may be someone else >> on the list with time (in lockdown like I am) to put me

Re: [NTG-context] Luatex format error

> On 23 May 2021, at 23:41, Hans Hagen wrote: > > So this is not lmtx (which also has luatex) but the regular installation > right? The error occurs when there is a newline before the \starttext, as in the attachment. Remove the initial newline, and it compiles with context line_bug.tex

Re: [NTG-context] Luatex format error

> On 23 May 2021, at 23:41, Hans Hagen wrote: > > So this is not lmtx (which also has luatex) but the regular installation > right? It works with mtxrun math_style.tex but not context math_style.tex where the file math_style.tex only contains \starttext \m{f = \beta} \stoptext It does

Re: [NTG-context] --luatex option failing

On 5/28/2021 11:40 AM, jbf wrote: Still finding it very difficult to nail what the real problem is. You say: "An mtxrun --generate or even context --generate should work ok. if not there's something with permissions or paths or a missing file". Neither of the --generate options make any

Re: [NTG-context] --luatex option failing

Still finding it very difficult to nail what the real problem is. You say: "An mtxrun --generate or even context --generate should work ok. if not there's something with permissions or paths or a missing file". Neither of the --generate options make any difference, so it clearly has to come

Re: [NTG-context] --luatex option failing

On 5/28/2021 7:13 AM, jbf wrote: Hi list, Not at all sure why this is happening. In my most recent install of lmtx (which works fine as lmtx) on Linux, I wanted to choose the --luatex option just to make a comparison between the mkiv output and lmtx. The redirection part seems to work (...

[NTG-context] --luatex option failing

Hi list, Not at all sure why this is happening. In my most recent install of lmtx (which works fine as lmtx) on Linux, I wanted to choose the --luatex option just to make a comparison between the mkiv output and lmtx. The redirection part seems to work (... --script mtx-context --luatex

Re: [NTG-context] Luatex format error

> On 23 May 2021, at 23:41, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 5/23/2021 9:28 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: >> Using TexLive 2021, I got the error below. How to fix it? What input file >> should one give? >> % context math_style.tex >> resolvers | formats | executing runner 'run luatex format': >>

Re: [NTG-context] Luatex format error

On 5/23/2021 9:28 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: Using TexLive 2021, I got the error below. How to fix it? What input file should one give? % context math_style.tex resolvers | formats | executing runner 'run luatex format': /usr/local/texlive/2021/bin/universal-darwin/luatex

[NTG-context] Luatex format error

Using TexLive 2021, I got the error below. How to fix it? What input file should one give? % context math_style.tex resolvers | formats | executing runner 'run luatex format': /usr/local/texlive/2021/bin/universal-darwin/luatex --jobname="math_style"

[NTG-context] Luatex 1.13.1 announcement.

== LuaTeX 1.13.1 2021-04-02 == Fixed an unwanted space in btex etex in metapost, introduced after a patch for troff. -- luigi

[NTG-context] Luatex 1.13.0 announcement.

== LuaTeX 1.13.0 2021-03-12 == This is the release for TeX live 2021. Callback for nesting level used in tracingmacros. It is is a variant of \tracingstacklevels by Petr Olsak

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX and PDF.js

08. 01. 2021. u 05:41, Aditya Mahajan piše: On Fri, 8 Jan 2021, Hans Hagen wrote: On 1/8/2021 12:39 AM, Vedran Miletić wrote: It's whatever ConTeXt standalone has. I don't have any extra Lua installed: --credits should mention the lua version Should I see it on non-HiDPI as well? Because

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX and PDF.js

On Fri, 8 Jan 2021, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 1/8/2021 12:39 AM, Vedran Miletić wrote: > > > It's whatever ConTeXt standalone has. I don't have any extra Lua installed: > > --credits should mention the lua version > > > Should I see it on non-HiDPI as well? Because it seems it's there. > >

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX and PDF.js

On 07. 01. 2021. 23:01, Hans Hagen wrote: what lua does your 2.08 have? if it's 5.2. then such small differences can be a side effect of lua (different number models), serialization of numbers (default accuracy), or maybe rounding in the lua=>tex font interface (there were some fixes iir),

[NTG-context] LuaTeX and PDF.js

Hello, I compared latest ConTeXt standalone (LuaTeX 2.08) against TeX Live 2020 (LuaTeX 1.12). The produced PDFs are: https://miletic.net/lipsum-112.pdf https://miletic.net/lipsum-208.pdf Viewing them with Evince (and I assume Adobe Reader, I don't have it at hand to test) shows only minor

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX and PDF.js

On 1/8/2021 12:39 AM, Vedran Miletić wrote: It's whatever ConTeXt standalone has. I don't have any extra Lua installed: --credits should mention the lua version Should I see it on non-HiDPI as well? Because it seems it's there. depends on what you consider (non) hdpi ... the positioning

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX and PDF.js

On 1/7/2021 10:10 PM, Vedran Miletić wrote: Hello, I compared latest ConTeXt standalone (LuaTeX 2.08) against TeX Live 2020 (LuaTeX 1.12). The produced PDFs are: https://miletic.net/lipsum-112.pdf https://miletic.net/lipsum-208.pdf Viewing them with Evince (and I assume Adobe Reader, I

[NTG-context] Luatex 1.12.0 announcement.

== LuaTeX 1.12.0 2020-03-15 == This is the release for TeX live 2020. --shell-restricted now forbids loading of dso (dll/so object) Scaled virtual font Aadditional primitives

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX incompatible with Lua

On 11/21/2019 8:17 AM, Henri Menke wrote: Dear list, The following Lua script behaves differently when executed in Lua vs. LuaTeX.     print(os.execute("date")) It seems that the definition of os_execute in loslibext.c was copied over from Lua 5.1 and not adapted to newer versions.     $

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX incompatible with Lua

Below I include a suggestion on how to do this sort of version agnostic. Cheers, Henri Live example on Wandbox: https://wandbox.org/permlink/jEn9kNnPB0t5rwjP --- #include #include #include #include #include static int (*lua_os_execute)(lua_State *L) = NULL; static int

[NTG-context] LuaTeX incompatible with Lua

Dear list, The following Lua script behaves differently when executed in Lua vs. LuaTeX. print(os.execute("date")) It seems that the definition of os_execute in loslibext.c was copied over from Lua 5.1 and not adapted to newer versions. $ lua5.1 test.lua 0 $ lua5.2 test.lua

[NTG-context] Luatex 1.11.1 announcement

== LuaTeX 1.11.1 2019-10-28 == First release of luahbtex / luajithbtex, luatex / luajittex with harfbuzz. Small bug fixes, code clean up and a couple of new primitives to match

[NTG-context] luatex-fonts-merged.lua broken?

Hans, we think that luatex-fonts-merged.lua is broken: It contains in line 8594 return characters.indicgroups (from luatex-basics-chr.lua) and such a return statement is a problem in a merged file. -- Ulrike Fischer https://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/

[NTG-context] luatex crash around page 1000

The event manager says, that it is a stack exhaustion (0xc0fd, STATUS_STACK_OVERFLOW). Many thanks. I'll increase size of stack. Best, Akira ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an

Re: [NTG-context] luatex crash around page 1000

Am 12.04.2019 um 07:36 schrieb Akira Kakuto: >> mtx-context | fatal error: return code: -1073741571 > > I suspect that may be a limitation in 32bit binary. > Try to install 64bit ConTeXt if you are using 32bit one > and your OS is 64bit. > I'm already on 64bit, so that won't help here. The

Re: [NTG-context] luatex crash around page 1000

On 4/12/2019 7:36 AM, Akira Kakuto wrote: mtx-context | fatal error: return code: -1073741571 I suspect that may be a limitation in 32bit binary. Try to install 64bit ConTeXt if you are using 32bit one and your OS is 64bit. Indeed. Most memory or stack related overflows in the engine

Re: [NTG-context] luatex crash around page 1000

On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 8:03 AM Akira Kakuto wrote: > > mtx-context | fatal error: return code: -1073741571 > > I suspect that may be a limitation in 32bit binary. > Try to install 64bit ConTeXt if you are using 32bit one > and your OS is 64bit. > > The other chance is the inclusion of a

[NTG-context] luatex crash around page 1000

mtx-context | fatal error: return code: -1073741571 I suspect that may be a limitation in 32bit binary. Try to install 64bit ConTeXt if you are using 32bit one and your OS is 64bit. Best, Akira ___ If your

Re: [NTG-context] luatex crash around page 1000

On 4/11/2019 12:28 PM, Peter Rolf wrote: I have a compilation problem with a data driven document. This is what I get after around 12min (first run)... I'm still puzzled by this 12 min ... so less than one page per second ... do you need to process all that data each run? It's over a decade

Re: [NTG-context] luatex crash around page 1000

On 4/11/2019 12:28 PM, Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, I have a compilation problem with a data driven document. This is what I get after around 12min (first run)... that pretty slow ... [..] pages > flushing realpage 991, userpage 970, subpage 991 pages > flushing realpage 992,

[NTG-context] luatex crash around page 1000

Hi, I have a compilation problem with a data driven document. This is what I get after around 12min (first run)... [..] pages > flushing realpage 991, userpage 970, subpage 991 pages > flushing realpage 992, userpage 971, subpage 992 pages > flushing realpage 993,

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTex on Windows PCs

On 2019-03-04 Hans Hagen wrote: > On 3/4/2019 4:58 PM, Nigel King wrote: > > IT do not seem to be able to install a working version of LuaTeX on PCs. > > I have directed them to ConTeXt Garden but they have had no luck. > > > > https://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Standalone > > download > >

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTex on Windows PCs

On 3/4/2019 4:58 PM, Nigel King wrote: Hi All, I have been using ConTeXt on Macs for >20 years. Having written a particular piece of code for others to operate who have PCs, I am now stuck. I upgraded to LuaTeX some time ago as recommended on this list. IT do not seem to be able to install

[NTG-context] LuaTex on Windows PCs

Hi All, I have been using ConTeXt on Macs for >20 years. Having written a particular piece of code for others to operate who have PCs, I am now stuck. I upgraded to LuaTeX some time ago as recommended on this list. IT do not seem to be able to install a working version of LuaTeX on PCs. I have

[NTG-context] Luatex 1.09.2 announcement

== LuaTeX 1.09.2 2019-01-19 == This is a transitional release to LuaTeX 1.10 for TeX Live 2019 The LuaTeX team

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX manual is broken

On 1/18/2019 9:32 AM, Henri Menke wrote: Dear devs, The LuaTeX manual hosted at http://www.pragma-ade.nl/general/manuals/luatex.pdf is broken. All the pages are offset in all the viewers I tested. I tried: - Evince 3.28.4 (uses cairo 1.15.10) - PDF.js 2.0.943 - Foxit 2.4.4.0911 - muPDF

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX manual is broken

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:33 AM Henri Menke wrote: > Dear devs, > > The LuaTeX manual hosted at > http://www.pragma-ade.nl/general/manuals/luatex.pdf is broken. All the > pages are offset in all the viewers I tested. I tried: > > - Evince 3.28.4 (uses cairo 1.15.10) > - PDF.js 2.0.943 > -

[NTG-context] LuaTeX manual is broken

Dear devs, The LuaTeX manual hosted at http://www.pragma-ade.nl/general/manuals/luatex.pdf is broken. All the pages are offset in all the viewers I tested. I tried: - Evince 3.28.4 (uses cairo 1.15.10) - PDF.js 2.0.943 - Foxit 2.4.4.0911 - muPDF 1.12.0 Please fix. Cheers, Henri

Re: [NTG-context] [luatex] Luatex 1.09.0 announcement (following)

> We have a new pdf parser (pplib from Paweł Jackowski) that replaces > poppler. It is much smaller, a bit faster and it's written in > pure C [...] Is there a project page for pplib? The source code of this library contained in TeXLive is very, very uncommented – in particular, a description

Re: [NTG-context] [luatex] Luatex 1.09.0 announcement (following)

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 8:57 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > We have a new pdf parser (pplib from Paweł Jackowski) that replaces > > poppler. It is much smaller, a bit faster and it's written in > > pure C [...] > > Is there a project page for pplib? The source code of this library > contained

[NTG-context] Luatex 1.09.0 announcement (following)

Hi all, At the context meeting we presented (and discussed) the state of luatex and released 1.08 as a prelude to 1.09. Today we announce version 1.09. We are gradually entering into a "bug fix / no more features" mode. The goal is to have the beginning of "stable" luatex 1.10 for next texlive

[NTG-context] Luatex 1.09.0 announcement

== LuaTeX 1.09 2018-10-23 == (1) This is a release that fixed some bugs, and the latest with lua 5.2. (2) luaffi is still incomplete, so very likely there will be a new release

Re: [NTG-context] luatex on the garden

On 8/31/2018 8:56 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 08/31/2018 10:27 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: [...] A lot of work went into this release and we hope that it's worth it. I will rmove some older code paths in a few weeks (less code that way) so then beta's will assume the new binary is used. Many

[NTG-context] Luatex 1.08.0 announcement

== LuaTeX 1.08 2018-08-28 == (1) This release is a prelude to 1.10, the next stable iteration of LuaTeX after version 1.00. (2) Lua 5.3 is now considered to be default and we

Re: [NTG-context] luatex on the garden

On 08/31/2018 10:27 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > [...] > A lot of work went into this release and we hope that it's worth it. I > will rmove some older code paths in a few weeks (less code that way) so > then beta's will assume the new binary is used. Many thanks for the new LuaTeX, Hans. I have

[NTG-context] luatex on the garden

Hi, We now have a new version of luatex on the garden. This is the anual context meeting release which is a prelude to next years 1.10 version for texlive. The version number is 1.08 (as 1.09 will be out in a few months and mostly concerns some fixes needed for arm). For the average user

[NTG-context] luatex

Hi, We're in the process of pushing a new luatex binary to the garden. It might be that context and luatex are out of sync (version checking stuff) but all will be well in a while. Hans -

Re: [NTG-context] luatex hangs with \placebookmarks

Thanks for the fix in latest beta (05.12.2018). De : Joseph Canedo Envoyé le :mardi 24 avril 2018 13:00 À : mailing list for ConTeXt users Objet :RE: luatex hangs with \placebookmarks Just in case it helps if , openaction=FitWidth, focus=width] is commented out in first line, the hanging

Re: [NTG-context] luatex hangs with \placebookmarks

Just in case it helps if , openaction=FitWidth, focus=width] is commented out in first line, the hanging problem disappears. De : Joseph Canedo Envoyé le :lundi 23 avril 2018 18:56 À : mailing list for ConTeXt users Objet :luatex hangs with \placebookmarks Dear list, I use $ context

[NTG-context] luatex hangs with \placebookmarks

Dear list, I use $ context --version mtx-context | ConTeXt Process Management 1.02 mtx-context | current version: 2018.04.19 15:53 With this simple attached MWE, I have luatex hanging in run 3. No idea what I am doing wrong. In other cases I get a lua error (could not write a MWE yet

[NTG-context] luatex 1.08

Hi, We released luatex 1.08 beta which uses lua 5.3 and will be default on the garden as soon as mojca moves the bins to the right place. We don't expect many issues as we tested it for quite a while. The context current works on both 1.07 and 1.08 but of course at some point the beta might

[NTG-context] Luatex 1.07.0 announcement

== LuaTeX 1.07 2018-01-17 == (1) This release brings Lua 5.3 to LuaTeX. We have tested an experimental version for a few months and not encountered issues. (2) If you use Lua

Re: [NTG-context] luatex binary is too old

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:12 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 15 January 2018 at 20:54, luigi scarso wrote: >> Il 15 gen 2018 20:52, "Mojca Miklavec" ha scritto: >> On 15 January 2018 at 15:26, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >>> On 15 January 2018 at 14:56, Hans Hagen wrote:

Re: [NTG-context] luatex binary is too old

On 15 January 2018 at 20:54, luigi scarso wrote: > Il 15 gen 2018 20:52, "Mojca Miklavec" ha scritto: > On 15 January 2018 at 15:26, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> On 15 January 2018 at 14:56, Hans Hagen wrote: >>> On 1/15/2018 2:47 PM, Roger Mason wrote: : Your luatex binary is too old,

Re: [NTG-context] luatex binary is too old

Il 15 gen 2018 20:52, "Mojca Miklavec" ha scritto: On 15 January 2018 at 15:26, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 15 January 2018 at 14:56, Hans Hagen wrote: >> On 1/15/2018 2:47 PM, Roger Mason wrote: >>> >>> : Your luatex binary is too old, you need at least

Re: [NTG-context] luatex binary is too old

On 15 January 2018 at 15:26, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 15 January 2018 at 14:56, Hans Hagen wrote: >> On 1/15/2018 2:47 PM, Roger Mason wrote: >>> >>> : Your luatex binary is too old, you need at least version 1.05! >>> >>> Where do I get the updated luatex binary? >>> >>> I'm running on

Re: [NTG-context] luatex binary is too old

Hans Hagen writes: >> : Your luatex binary is too old, you need at least version 1.05! >> >> Where do I get the updated luatex binary? >> >> I'm running on FreeBSD 10.3, 32 bit. > Does that binary come from the garden too? > > Hans Yes, I did not compile it myself, if that

Re: [NTG-context] luatex binary is too old

On 15 January 2018 at 14:56, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 1/15/2018 2:47 PM, Roger Mason wrote: >> >> : Your luatex binary is too old, you need at least version 1.05! >> >> Where do I get the updated luatex binary? >> >> I'm running on FreeBSD 10.3, 32 bit. > > Does that binary come from the garden

Re: [NTG-context] luatex binary is too old

On 1/15/2018 2:47 PM, Roger Mason wrote: Hello, I just updated ConTeXt: context --version resolvers | trees | analyzing 'home:texmf' resolvers | globbing | confusing filename, name: 'README.txt', lower: 'readme.txt', already: 'ReadMe.txt' mtx-context | ConTeXt Process

[NTG-context] luatex binary is too old

Hello, I just updated ConTeXt: context --version resolvers | trees | analyzing 'home:texmf' resolvers | globbing | confusing filename, name: 'README.txt', lower: 'readme.txt', already: 'ReadMe.txt' mtx-context

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX: Weird GC behaviour

On 12/7/2017 12:40 AM, Shreevatsa R wrote: (Hope this gets threaded with the previous two messages...) I was the one who asked the question (https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/404617). Another thing I'd like to mention is that after a while `io.lines` simply returned nil, and the second

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX: Weird GC behaviour

(Hope this gets threaded with the previous two messages...) I was the one who asked the question (https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/404617). Another thing I'd like to mention is that after a while `io.lines` simply returned nil, and the second and third return values (error message and

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX: Weird GC behaviour

On 12/5/2017 10:47 PM, Henri wrote: Dear devs, This was asked on TeX.SX: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/404617 The example below runs perfectly fine in the normal Lua interpreter, but crashes in texlua because the maximum number of open file handles is exceeded.  This seems to be a

[NTG-context] LuaTeX: Weird GC behaviour

Dear devs, This was asked on TeX.SX: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/404617 The example below runs perfectly fine in the normal Lua interpreter, but crashes in texlua because the maximum number of open file handles is exceeded.  This seems to be a peculiarity of io.lines in texlua.  Is

Re: [NTG-context] luatex

Are there any implications for the LuaJIT support? LuaJIT is quite a bit faster than Lua which is why I always typeset my documents using luajittex. On Mon, 2017-10-30 at 17:26 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: > Hi, > > Luigi and I are currently looking into Lua 5.3 in combination with  > LuaTeX. We

Re: [NTG-context] luatex

> Luigi and I are currently looking into Lua 5.3 in combination with  > LuaTeX. We have an experimental setup and all seems to work well, > which  > given the new number model of Lua is good news. Depending on how we  > compile the binaries we either gain some speed or in the worst case  > loose

[NTG-context] luatex

Hi, Luigi and I are currently looking into Lua 5.3 in combination with LuaTeX. We have an experimental setup and all seems to work well, which given the new number model of Lua is good news. Depending on how we compile the binaries we either gain some speed or in the worst case loose half

[NTG-context] LuaTeX 1.0.3 announcement

Luigi has shown me a simple and useful application of ffi: In the case of lua(jit)tex in W32TeX, which are used in context, standard C libraries are linked statically. Thus it is necessary to load a necessary DLL for standard C functions, like the following meaningless example: \starttext $$

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX 1.0.3 announcement

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:59:14 +0100 luigi scarso wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Henri Menke > wrote: > > On 02/18/2017 09:42 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > >> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Henri Menke > >> wrote: >

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX 1.0.3 announcement

On 2/18/2017 2:27 PM, Henri Menke wrote: On 02/18/2017 09:42 AM, luigi scarso wrote: On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Henri Menke wrote: On 02/17/2017 08:57 PM, luigi scarso wrote: How can I use the FFI? There is nothing in the latest docs. Thanks for all the efforts!

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX 1.0.3 announcement

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Henri Menke wrote: > On 02/18/2017 09:42 AM, luigi scarso wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Henri Menke wrote: >>> On 02/17/2017 08:57 PM, luigi scarso wrote: >>> How can I use the FFI? There is nothing in the

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX 1.0.3 announcement

On 2/18/2017 2:27 PM, Henri Menke wrote: On 02/18/2017 09:42 AM, luigi scarso wrote: On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Henri Menke wrote: On 02/17/2017 08:57 PM, luigi scarso wrote: How can I use the FFI? There is nothing in the latest docs. Thanks for all the efforts!

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX 1.0.3 announcement

On 02/18/2017 09:42 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Henri Menke wrote: >> On 02/17/2017 08:57 PM, luigi scarso wrote: >> How can I use the FFI? There is nothing in the latest docs. Thanks for all >> the efforts! > luatex ffi is beyond the

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX 1.0.3 announcement

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Henri Menke wrote: > On 02/17/2017 08:57 PM, luigi scarso wrote: > How can I use the FFI? There is nothing in the latest docs. Thanks for all > the efforts! luatex ffi is beyond the "experimental state", and aims to be compatible with

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX 1.0.3 announcement

On 02/17/2017 08:57 PM, luigi scarso wrote: > == > LuaTeX Release 1.0.3 was released 2017021514 > == > > This is a minor upgrade and probably this version will go on texlive. >

[NTG-context] LuaTeX 1.0.3 announcement

== LuaTeX Release 1.0.3 was released 2017021514 == This is a minor upgrade and probably this version will go on texlive. There are a couple of fixes and additions. - We added a

Re: [NTG-context] Luatex 1.0.0 announcement

> Version 1.0.0 Ahoi, I just saw that the LuaTeX website is a bit outdated. Would be good if you’d mention the current state. Greetlings, Hraban ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an

Re: [NTG-context] Luatex 1.0.0 announcement

On 09/27/2016 08:37 PM, luigi scarso wrote: > Version 1.0.0 > > After some ten years of development and testing, today we have released > LuaTeX 1.0.0! [...] > > Hans Hagen > Hartmut Henkel > Taco Hoekwater > Luigi Scarso Hans, Harmut, Taco and Luigi, many thanks for the release and your

[NTG-context] Luatex 1.0.0 announcement

Version 1.0.0 After some ten years of development and testing, today we have released LuaTeX 1.0.0! Instead of staying below one and ending up with versions like 0.99.1234, we decided that the moment is there to show the TeX audience that LuaTeX is stable enough to loose its beta status. Although

Re: [NTG-context] luatex-0.98.0 for linux?

On 08/07/2016 02:28 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 7 August 2016 at 10:44, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> Dear ConTeXt maintainers, >> >> would it be possible that ConTeXt Standalone for the linux platform had >> the latest LuaTeX binaries? >> [...] >> Many thanks for your help, > [...] > But it would

Re: [NTG-context] luatex-0.98.0 for linux?

On 7 August 2016 at 10:44, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > Dear ConTeXt maintainers, > > would it be possible that ConTeXt Standalone for the linux platform had > the latest LuaTeX binaries? > > Besides the update, I think it is important to confirm whether English > hyphenation is fixed in the latest

[NTG-context] luatex-0.98.0 for linux?

Dear ConTeXt maintainers, would it be possible that ConTeXt Standalone for the linux platform had the latest LuaTeX binaries? Besides the update, I think it is important to confirm whether English hyphenation is fixed in the latest binary. The following sample: \starttext

[NTG-context] Luatex 0.95.0 announcement

== LuaTeX Release 0.95 for TeX Live 2016 was released 2016042515 == This is the official frozen TeXlive 2016 version and a prerelease of the stable 1.0 version. - deleted

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX finds font, mtxrun --fonts does not list it?

Sandra Snan 30. Mai 2016 um 14:25 For some reason, it just started working today. After all this time. I have no idea what was going on. \definefontfamily[jeans][sans][file:futuralt] and then referring to to the font family "jeans" later on. Looks great,

Re: [NTG-context] LuaTeX finds font, mtxrun --fonts does not list it?

For some reason, it just started working today. After all this time. I have no idea what was going on. \definefontfamily[jeans][sans][file:futuralt] and then referring to to the font family "jeans" later on. Looks great, too. Sandra Sandra Snan writes: >

Re: [NTG-context] Luatex 0.90.0 announcement

On 5 May 2016 at 12:18, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 29 March 2016 at 18:07, Henman wrote: >> Is the newly released version you mention below, already (or will it be) >> available in the newest stand-alone download for ConteXt? > > Don't you get 0.95.0 already? Which architecture are you interested

Re: [NTG-context] Luatex 0.90.0 announcement

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Mojca Miklavec < mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 29 March 2016 at 18:07, Henman wrote: > > Is the newly released version you mention below, already (or will it be) > > available in the newest stand-alone download for ConteXt? > > Don't you get 0.95.0

Re: [NTG-context] Luatex 0.90.0 announcement

On 29 March 2016 at 18:07, Henman wrote: > Is the newly released version you mention below, already (or will it be) > available in the newest stand-alone download for ConteXt? Don't you get 0.95.0 already? Which architecture are you interested in? It is not impossible that I misconfigured

Re: [NTG-context] Luatex 0.90.0 announcement

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Henman wrote: > Is the newly released version you mention below, already (or will it be) > available in the newest stand-alone download for ConteXt? Sorry for delay, we were busy with the texlive deadline. Luatex beta-0.90.0 was the release

Re: [NTG-context] Luatex 0.90.0 announcement

Is the newly released version you mention below, already (or will it be) available in the newest stand-alone download for ConteXt? On 03/29/2016 06:35 AM, luigi scarso wrote: LuaTeX Release 0.90.0 was released 2016032512

Re: [NTG-context] Luatex 0.95.0 error with bidi and Hebrew

On 5/1/2016 8:19 AM, Akira Kakuto wrote: Code: ... My installation, or is this a bug? Confirmed. By testing i, your example is compiled: if i then -- line 1205 in font-otj.lua local leftkern = i.leftkern if leftkern and leftkern ~= 0 then

[NTG-context] Luatex 0.95.0 error with bidi and Hebrew

Code: ... My installation, or is this a bug? Confirmed. By testing i, your example is compiled: if i then -- line 1205 in font-otj.lua local leftkern = i.leftkern if leftkern and leftkern ~= 0 then setfield(prev,"replace",newkern(leftkern)) -- maybe also leftkern end end

[NTG-context] Luatex 0.95.0 error with bidi and Hebrew

Version information: ConTeXt ver: 2016.04.30 18:59 MKIV beta fmt: 2016.4.30 int: english/english luajittex, 0.95.0 and luatex, 0.95.0 running on Windows 10 x64 Error message: error: ...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/font-otj.lua:1205: attempt to index

[NTG-context] Luatex 0.90.0 announcement

== LuaTeX Release 0.90.0 was released 2016032512 == This is the version that will go on TeX Live 2016 - mostly small bug fixes - a few setters/getters added to the pdf

[NTG-context] Luatex 0.89.0 announcement

== Luatex Release 0.89.0 was released 2016020500 == No fundamental changes, just some fixes / improvements (and of course new bugglets). - New backend things: \pdfvariable

[NTG-context] Luatex 0.88.0 announcement

== Luatex Release 0.88.0 was released 2016011500 == This is a next step upto 0.90 and it has the following changes: - mostly small bug fixes - a few setters/getters added to

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >