Re: [NTG-context] mathalignment vs mathmatrix

2017-09-08 Thread Henri
You obviously didn't read my first mailing correctly and copied an incomplete version of my MWE. The definitions of \Up and \Dn are right there before \starttext.  Whether the mathmatrix is empty of not does not make a difference.  For the sake of completeness I present you a different MWE

Re: [NTG-context] mathalignment vs mathmatrix

2017-09-08 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Henri, I think your code has a problem: the first one is that the definition of \Up and \Down is not understood when I compile your example, and then you introduce an empty mathmatrix which creates a difficulty too. Once I remove the definitions of \Up and \Dn the code is typeset (ConTeXt

[NTG-context] mathalignment vs mathmatrix

2017-09-07 Thread Henri
Dear devs, In the latest beta the interaction between mathalignment and mathmatrix is broken.  The biggest problem is that documents containing this pattern do not typeset anymore at all!  (That makes 100 errors; please try again.)  Please fix. Cheers, Henri --- \define\Up{\mathord\Uparrow}