On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 18:03:35 +0200
Hans Hagen wrote:
> > I have been massacred on this list for ever preferring \over to
> > \frac...
>
> and because of the many {} you then need you get these mismatch
> errors ... but, you can make
>
>
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/7/2017 4:50 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this might be a matter of taste.
>>>
>>> look at the output of (attached).
On 6/7/2017 4:50 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
this might be a matter of taste.
look at the output of (attached). In my opinion the first square root
is to "high", while it looks better on the second line.
On 6/7/2017 5:12 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi,
Indeed using \frac yields a weird result in the example sent by Mikael.
Compare the output of the three formulas below, with or without
\setupmathradical[sqrt][alternative=default].
The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the
On 6/7/2017 5:45 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:12:44 +0200
Otared Kavian wrote:
The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the first
one is weird when using \frac and
I have been massacred on this list for ever preferring \over to \frac...
> On 7 Jun 2017, at 17:45, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:12:44 +0200
> Otared Kavian wrote:
>
>> The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the first
>> one is weird when using \frac and
>
> I have been massacred on this
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:12:44 +0200
Otared Kavian wrote:
> The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the first
> one is weird when using \frac and
I have been massacred on this list for ever preferring \over to \frac...
Hi,
Indeed using \frac yields a weird result in the example sent by Mikael.
Compare the output of the three formulas below, with or without
\setupmathradical[sqrt][alternative=default].
The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the first one is weird
when using \frac and
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this might be a matter of taste.
>
> look at the output of (attached). In my opinion the first square root
> is to "high", while it looks better on the second line. From
> setup-en.pdf it looks like the
Hi,
this might be a matter of taste.
look at the output of (attached). In my opinion the first square root
is to "high", while it looks better on the second line. From
setup-en.pdf it looks like the default of \setupmathradical is set to
normal (and not default). I don't understand what normal
10 matches
Mail list logo