Re: [NTG-context] running headers on postponed makeup

2011-02-15 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 22.12.2010 um 16:35 schrieb Hans Hagen: On 22-12-2010 4:14, Steffen Wolfrum wrote: wow, isn't this even worse?! depends on the view: consistency comes first, reasons why come next Please look at your example (page 7) attached: Now you have Header = 1.1 A Section = 1.2 B

Re: [NTG-context] running headers on postponed makeup

2010-12-20 Thread Hans Hagen
On 19-12-2010 11:31, Philipp Gesang wrote: On 2010-12-1821:06:11, Hans Hagen wrote: On 18-12-2010 6:12, Philipp Gesang wrote: after discovering postponed insertions I encountered a problem when combining it with the makeup mechanism I am so fond of. The next beta will have changes mark

Re: [NTG-context] running headers on postponed makeup

2010-12-19 Thread Philipp Gesang
On 2010-12-18 21:06:11, Hans Hagen wrote: On 18-12-2010 6:12, Philipp Gesang wrote: after discovering postponed insertions I encountered a problem when combining it with the makeup mechanism I am so fond of. The next beta will have changes mark behaviour: no reset in everyforget cases,

[NTG-context] running headers on postponed makeup

2010-12-18 Thread Philipp Gesang
Hi all, after discovering postponed insertions I encountered a problem when combining it with the makeup mechanism I am so fond of. ยทยทยท8 \definemakeup[my] \setupmakeup[my][ headerstate=start, page=yes, ] \startbuffer[mkup]

Re: [NTG-context] running headers on postponed makeup

2010-12-18 Thread Hans Hagen
On 18-12-2010 6:12, Philipp Gesang wrote: after discovering postponed insertions I encountered a problem when combining it with the makeup mechanism I am so fond of. The next beta will have changes mark behaviour: no reset in everyforget cases, and a fix for pages with no text. The first