Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-25 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/24/2016 10:01 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: And SumatraPDF has this particular feature implemented. currently sumatra is behaving quite weird with these zoom features because using named destinations has no advantage when ther eis no view and not all hyperlinked constructs have views

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-25 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/25/2016 7:51 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 02/23/2016 09:33 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: the hyperlink mechanism currently has the options page,name,auto (auto being default) so you can try name but still not get what you want; the page variant is needed for documents with 100K or more hyperlinks

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-24 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 02/24/2016 10:50 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: >> Pablo Rodriguez 24. Februar 2016 um 10:01 >> [...] >> These options are totally new (and previously unknown to me). I’m afraid >> I wasn’t able to find them in the ConTeXt command list >> (http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/qrcs/setup-en.pdf). >

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-24 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 02/23/2016 09:33 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > the hyperlink mechanism currently has the options page,name,auto (auto > being default) so you can try name but still not get what you want; the > page variant is needed for documents with 100K or more hyperlinks (and > in fact the ability to choose

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-24 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Pablo Rodriguez 24. Februar 2016 um 10:01 On 02/23/2016 09:33 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 2/23/2016 12:21 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Well, Sumatra works fine with this concrete feature (at least, this is my experience). And mupdf is the only exception in this regard. hm,

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-24 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 02/23/2016 11:07 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: > Just speculating, could one distribute a PDF that would be like a book > with many parts? I know that Hans is not a fan of part, but I wonder > how this is handled? I doubt that any viewers handle prefixed page > numbers properly. I just tried looking

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-24 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 02/23/2016 09:33 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 2/23/2016 12:21 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > >> Well, Sumatra works fine with this concrete feature (at least, this is >> my experience). And mupdf is the only exception in this regard. > > hm, sumatra uses the mupdf engine Well, this is more

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-23 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:30:25 + Christoph Reller wrote: > (btw, footnotes will always be sort of a pain as they are > rendered in special ways, but footnotes should be forbidden anyway; > if a doc is also for screen endnotes are way better) > > I agree with you

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-23 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 23:54:00 +0100 Martin Schröder wrote: > 2016-02-22 21:40 GMT+01:00 Alan BRASLAU : > > This makes me think: Is there some "standard" way for a PDF to > > contain both versions? > > Adobe introduced something called "portfolios" in PDF

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-23 Thread Christoph Reller
Hi Hans, First and foremost: Thank you for uploading the Beta! This solves the problem I have reported with \reference and focus=standard: https://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context%40ntg.nl/msg79620.html On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:00 PM Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 2/23/2016 12:21

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-23 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/23/2016 12:21 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Well, Sumatra works fine with this concrete feature (at least, this is my experience). And mupdf is the only exception in this regard. hm, sumatra uses the mupdf engine Besides that, all other links use named destinations, so why are they so

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-22 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 02/22/2016 08:13 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 2/21/2016 8:54 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> >> I’m afraid there is a regression partially displayed in the following >> code: > > btw, imo docs for screen should be designed for screen (or one should > make two versions, one for screen, one for

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-22 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 02/22/2016 08:08 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 2/21/2016 8:54 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> [...] >> The regression is that \setupinteraction[focus=standard] doesn’t work >> with hyperlink in table of contents for chapter in betas from 2016.02.15 >> 10:26. > > a bit too complex example Many

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-22 Thread Martin Schröder
2016-02-22 21:40 GMT+01:00 Alan BRASLAU : > This makes me think: Is there some "standard" way for a PDF to contain > both versions? Adobe introduced something called "portfolios" in PDF 1.7 or later, but I doubt that they work with non-Adobe viewers. Best Martin

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-22 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:13:27 +0100 Hans Hagen wrote: > btw, imo docs for screen should be designed for screen (or one should > make two versions, one for screen, one for print) and footnotes > should be pop ups or roll-overs but the free acrobat alternatives are > not clever

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-22 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/21/2016 8:54 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Hans, I’m afraid there is a regression partially displayed in the following code: btw, imo docs for screen should be designed for screen (or one should make two versions, one for screen, one for print) and footnotes should be pop ups or

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-22 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/21/2016 8:54 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Hans, I’m afraid there is a regression partially displayed in the following code: \setupinteraction[state=start, focus=standard] \enabledirectives[references.border] \setupinteractionscreen[option=fit]

[NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-21 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
Hans, I’m afraid there is a regression partially displayed in the following code: \setupinteraction[state=start, focus=standard] \enabledirectives[references.border] \setupinteractionscreen[option=fit] \setupnote[footnote][way=bytext, location=text] \starttext