Hi,
I use \definesynonyms in several documents but it seems to be broken!
For testing purposes I use the folowing command:
\definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\infull]
\kind{to}{test one!}
\kind{t}{sonething else}
\definesynonyms[state][states][\infull]
\state{a}{anything}
\state{ab}{anything b
Verhaag, G.C.H.M. verhaagg...@ziggo.nl writes:
\definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\infull]
\definesynonyms[state][states][\infull]
Don't use the same command. Better:
\definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\KindFull]
\definesynonyms[state][states][\StateFull]
--
Peter
Peter Münster wrote:
Verhaag, G.C.H.M. verhaagg...@ziggo.nl writes:
\definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\infull]
\definesynonyms[state][states][\infull]
Don't use the same command. Better:
\definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\KindFull]
\definesynonyms[state][states][\StateFull]
Hi,
Thanks
Hi,
the following example works in mkii, but in mkiv the first 'infull' won't
appear:
\enableregime [utf]
\definesynonyms [StandardAbbrev] [StandardAbbrevs] [\infull]
\definesynonyms [TechAbbrev] [TechAbbrevs] [\infull]
\StandardAbbrev [DIN] {\kap{din}} {Deutsches Institut für Normung~e.\,V
Dear all,
When defining abbreviations through \definesynonyms, if the abbreviation
contains a digit then it seems that the built-in macro is not recognized: in
the example below the command \EEG is recognized, whereas \M2 or \Y2K are not.
Is there a way around this difficulty? Or should one
On 13-5-2010 10:42, Otared Kavian wrote:
Dear all,
When defining abbreviations through \definesynonyms, if the abbreviation
contains a digit then it seems that the built-in macro is not recognized: in
the example below the command \EEG is recognized, whereas \M2 or \Y2K
Roland wrote:
Hi, sorry to get back to this so late but I still can't get it to work
with the latest updated ConTeXt Minimals. Am I using a wrong command?
Is the command already integrated in the latest Minimals? I can't seem
to find it in the setup-en.pdf file dated August 28th...
there is
Roland wrote:
Hi, sorry to get back to this so late but I still can't get it to work
with the latest updated ConTeXt Minimals. Am I using a wrong command?
Is the command already integrated in the latest Minimals? I can't seem
to find it in the setup-en.pdf file dated August 28th...
Solution
%\definesynonyms[abbreviation][abbreviations][\infull]
2
3 \starttext
4 \abbreviation{VVV}{Bureau of Tourist Information}
5 The Dutch \VVV\ can provide you with the tourist
6 information on Hasselt.
7 \completelistofabbreviations
8 \stoptext
Output:
1
Hi all,
LuaTex doesn't seem to like the \definesynonyms command. The following
works fine in PDFtex:
1 \definesynonyms[abbreviation][abbreviations][\infull]
2
3 \starttext
4 \abbreviation{VVV}{Bureau of Tourist Information}
5 The Dutch \VVV\ (\infull{VVV}) can
}{Bureau of Tourist Information}.
Kevin
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Roland ntg-cont...@rolandsiebelink.comwrote:
Hi all,
LuaTex doesn't seem to like the \definesynonyms command. The following
works fine in PDFtex:
1 \definesynonyms[abbreviation][abbreviations][\infull]
2
3
Am 27.07.2006 um 07:54 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
You can also do
\def\PID[#1]#2[#3]{\getparameters[PID#1][#3]}
% #2 is to gobble spaces
thanks for that hint Aditya!
Bernd
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
Bernd Militzer wrote:
Am 27.07.2006 um 07:54 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
You can also do
\def\PID[#1]#2[#3]{\getparameters[PID#1][#3]}
% #2 is to gobble spaces
thanks for that hint Aditya!
There is also this (more formal) solution:
\def\PID{\dodoubleempty\doPID}
Am 28.07.2006 um 16:34 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
There is also this (more formal) solution:
\def\PID{\dodoubleempty\doPID}
\def\doPID[#1][#2]{\getparameters[PID#1][#2]}
thanks Taco!
Cheers, Bernd
___
ntg-context mailing list
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Bernd Militzer wrote:
Thanks a Taco!
with PID[268]%
^
[Fam=Rudolph,
Nam=Rudluffen,
Vor=Adam]
You can also do
\def\PID[#1]#2[#3]{\getparameters[PID#1][#3]}
% #2 is to gobble spaces
\def\doGetPID#1#2{\getvalue{PID#2#1}}
Thanks a Taco!
with PID[268]%
^
[Fam=Rudolph,
Nam=Rudluffen,
Vor=Adam]
all is ok.
Bernd
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Am 24.07.2006 um 11:11 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
But it is probably easier to write a small database interface
layer. Somewhat like this (note that I had to change \doGeTPID
as well).
\def\PID[#1][#2]{\getparameters[PID#1][#2]}
\def\doGetPID#1#2{\getvalue{PID#2#1}}
Bernd Militzer wrote:
Hi all,
for a large ancestor-project I defined a set of informations for a
lot of persons like you can see below.
QUESTION: how many synonyms can I max. define? I need about 4000 defs.
If you need only 4000 separate PIDs, that should work ok.
or has someone a
Bernd Militzer wrote:
Hi all,
for a large ancestor-project I defined a set of informations for a
lot of persons like you can see below.
QUESTION: how many synonyms can I max. define? I need about 4000 defs.
a lot (as much as tex's hash + mem permits; the hash can be 100K)
Hans
%
\definesynonyms[PID][PIDs][\doGetPID]
\PID{Fam268}{Rudolph}
\PID{Nam268}{Rudluffen}
\PID{Vor268}{Adam}
\PID{Ruf268}{Adam}
\PID{Geb268}{k.A.}
\PID{GebOrt268} {Oberkoskau}
\PID{Tau268}{19. Mai 1725}
\PID{TauOrt268
20 matches
Mail list logo
