Re: [NTG-context] \setupenumeration(s) was: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV

2010-01-05 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
em][stopper=)] >> >> When I would follow the system from other setup commands in context >> i expect as correct names \setupenumeration and \setupdescription. >> > If I understand context manual correctly (I not checked this) > (cont-enp.pdf, pp. 181,183) I could u

Re: [NTG-context] \setupenumeration(s) was: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV

2010-01-04 Thread Vladimir Lomov
setup commands in context > i expect as correct names \setupenumeration and \setupdescription. > If I understand context manual correctly (I not checked this) (cont-enp.pdf, pp. 181,183) I could use more than one name in \setupenumerations (\setupdescriptions), e.g. \setupenumerations[problem,rem

[NTG-context] \setupenumeration(s) was: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV

2010-01-04 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Sorry to hijack your post and since we're already there, why are \setupenumerations and \setupdescriptions written in the plural form. > \setupenumerations[problem][stopper=)] When I would follow the system from other setup commands in context i expect as correct names \setupenumera

Re: [NTG-context] defineenumeration and setupenumeration

2006-05-04 Thread Taco Hoekwater
WN wrote: > I am a bit confused, the example setups the enumaration *remark* and > specifies the location=top > > But on page 224 the command \setupenumerations is shown where one can also > specify the location among others. > > What is the difference, reason or usage for doing this ? Much of

[NTG-context] defineenumeration and setupenumeration

2006-04-30 Thread WN
Hi, I have a question (probably a dumb question) relating to some of the define/setup commands. One in particular, but it may relate to the other define/setup commands as well. Looking at the defineenumeration and setupenumerations command in the Context manual page 223 and page 224 an exampl