A general question. I use setupenumerations to define theorem-,
lemma-, and definition-environments for my document. I realised that
setupenumerations is overwriting keys that are set in setupitemize
(and groups defined by defineitemgroup).
~~~snip~~~
\setupenumerations [numberconversion
Am 20.02.2014 um 14:45 schrieb Thomas Möbius kont...@thomasmoebius.de:
A general question. I use setupenumerations to define theorem-,
lemma-, and definition-environments for my document. I realised that
setupenumerations is overwriting keys that are set in setupitemize
(and groups defined
2014-02-20 14:52 GMT+01:00 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com:
Am 20.02.2014 um 14:45 schrieb Thomas Möbius kont...@thomasmoebius.de:
A general question. I use setupenumerations to define theorem-,
lemma-, and definition-environments for my document. I realised
Hi Tobias,
When I try to use \setupenumerations in the latest beta
(2013.03.22 12:06) for multiple enumerations, the
alternative=... is ignored for all but the first enumeration.
It's not just the enumeration; e.g. the color key, too is applied to
only to the first enumeration class named.
I
Am 26.03.2013 um 12:52 schrieb Sietse Brouwer sbbrou...@gmail.com:
Hi Tobias,
When I try to use \setupenumerations in the latest beta
(2013.03.22 12:06) for multiple enumerations, the
alternative=... is ignored for all but the first enumeration.
It's not just the enumeration; e.g
Hi Sietse, Wolfgang,
Thanks for your replies!
Indeed, I do not have a reference to some manual. However, there is this
old thread http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2010/046090.html and reading
\setupenumerations in plural form, I just supposed that it should work for
multiple enumerations
Hi list,
While learning the very basics of context, I stumbled upon the following
bug:
When I try to use \setupenumerations in the latest beta (2013.03.22 12:06)
for multiple enumerations, the alternative=... is ignored for all but the
first enumeration.
A minimal example demonstrating what I
