Ah, I see. Thanks!
Am Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:14:07 +0200
schrieb Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Holzminister wrote:
Hi!
Can anyone explain the differences between the mentioned commands?
the first one can be used to tune the rendering of footnotes (cf.
descriptions), while the second
Hi!
Can anyone explain the differences between the mentioned commands?
Thanks in advance,
Eyke
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
Holzminister wrote:
Hi!
Can anyone explain the differences between the mentioned commands?
the first one can be used to tune the rendering of footnotes (cf.
descriptions), while the second influences the footnote handling and
inline symbol
Thanks to Albrecht and Steffen for their quick and informative replies.
I guess \setupfootnotedefinition isn't what I am looking for. It seems
to mainly be a way to customize the footnote *numbering*, right? What I
wanted to try was to put footnotes in the margin. My text has a lot
Hi Matt,
this is my definition of footnotes:
\def\withdot#1{#1.\kern.3em}
\setupfootnotes[rule=off,numbercommand=\withdot,way=bytext]
\setupfootnotedefinition[location=serried]
\setupfootnotedefinition[before={\hangindent=.5pc \hangafter=1}]
\definedescription[footnotenumbering][numberstyle=\tf
Hi Matt,
you may also look at the following, although not too realistic -)
\def\myFNnumber#1{\hskip2em\inframed[width=1em,offset=.
0em,frame=on,align=left]{#1} \hskip1em}
\setupfootnotedefinition[command=
\myFNnumber,indentnext=yes,location=serried]
Steffen
Am 01.08.2007 um 01:48 schrieb
Hi, all--
Can anyone point me to a realistic example(s) of
\setupfootnotedefinition? I think it may help to solve a problem I am
working with, but don't understand precisely how to use it.
--
Matt Gushee
