On 12-10-2010 12:12, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 11:36:26 Taco Hoekwater wrote:
But as far as I know, windows still bases its file type detection
on extension, so that is something to keep in mind.
Oh, Windows... (written with disdain)
actually I like the filetype / suff
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 11:45:28 luigi scarso wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
> >
> > P.S. I am still using some real-time applications
> > running on computers under DOS, but I would not dream
> > of trying to put ConTeXt on such a system!
>
> Maybe not the ful
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 11:36:26 Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
> But as far as I know, windows still bases its file type detection
> on extension, so that is something to keep in mind.
>
Oh, Windows... (written with disdain)
__
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 October 2010 10:49:18 luigi scarso wrote:
>>
>> Yes; a good point for three letters for suffix is compatibility with
>> old OS and perhaps MIME questions.
>
> What? You mean DOS? And FAT?
yes; more generally I think to customer
On 10/12/2010 11:30 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 10:49:18 luigi scarso wrote:
Yes; a good point for three letters for suffix is compatibility with
old OS and perhaps MIME questions.
What? You mean DOS? And FAT?
Maybe we should restrict our coding as well to ascii...
Si
On 12-10-2010 11:30, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 10:49:18 luigi scarso wrote:
Yes; a good point for three letters for suffix is compatibility with
old OS and perhaps MIME questions.
What? You mean DOS? And FAT?
Maybe we should restrict our coding as well to ascii...
it's
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 10:49:18 luigi scarso wrote:
>
> Yes; a good point for three letters for suffix is compatibility with
> old OS and perhaps MIME questions.
What? You mean DOS? And FAT?
Maybe we should restrict our coding as well to ascii...
Alan
P.S. I am still using some real-time ap
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:35:01AM +0200, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r.
o. wrote:
> - OK, I'm planning to use .tex for Ctx files in the future. Now I'm using
> LaTeX and ConTeXt both, so I use .ctx extension for Ctx sources. Moreover,
> till I'm trying to achieve the same things in Ctx as
2010/10/12 Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. :
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:40:19 +0200, luigi scarso
>> You can also use .mkiv for ConTeXt MKIV
>
> Yes, it sounds better. I noticed .mkiv files in Ctx installation tree but I
> thought this extension is "reserved" for a kind of files rather than
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:40:19 +0200, luigi scarso wrote:
• the ctx file extension has a special meaning for context (file for
proprocessing in xml format).
- OK, I'm planning to use .tex for Ctx files in the future. Now I'm using
LaTeX and ConTeXt both, so I use .ctx extension for Ctx sources.
2010/10/12 Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. :
> Thanks, it works perfectly.
>
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:18:54 +0200, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>
>> • the ctx file extension has a special meaning for context (file for
>> proprocessing in xml format).
>
> - OK, I'm planning to use .tex for Ct
Thanks, it works perfectly.
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:18:54 +0200, Wolfgang Schuster
wrote:
Am 12.10.2010 um 09:13 schrieb Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o.:
Hello,
I'd have one more question.
I need to have many \subsubject behind each other (again: actually processing
an external fi
Am 12.10.2010 um 09:13 schrieb Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o.:
> Hello,
>
> I'd have one more question.
>
> I need to have many \subsubject behind each other (again: actually processing
> an external file, but a small example is attached):
\setuphead[subsection][before={\blank[prefere
Am 12.10.2010 um 09:13 schrieb Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o.:
> Hello,
>
> I'd have one more question.
>
> I need to have many \subsubject behind each other (again: actually processing
> an external file, but a small example is attached):
\setuphead[subsection][before={\blank[prefere
On Tue, Oct 12 2010, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote:
> The problem is that typesetting n-th \subsubject doesn't go to the next
> page, but is typeset on the same page, so that the last ones disappear.
This works, but I can't explain why:
\starttext
\dorecurse{30}{\startsection[titl
Hello,
I'd have one more question.
I need to have many \subsubject behind each other (again: actually processing
an external file, but a small example is attached):
---
\setupbodyfont[11pt]
\starttext
\subsubsubject{001}
\subsubsubject{002}
\subsubsubject{003}
\subsubsubjec
16 matches
Mail list logo
