Re: [NTG-context] problem with \sym?

2019-02-04 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
etuplines[before={}, after={}] \startlines}, after={\stoplines}] \setupCList[2][n, broad, packed, joinedup, autointro] [itemalign=flushright, left={}, right={}, stopper={}, margin=0pc, ] \startcomponent[*] \startCList \sym{} Preface \sym{0.} Prolegomena %<——line 22 \stopCList \stopcomponent

Re: [NTG-context] problem with \sym?

2019-02-04 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
\leaderfill{\leaders\hbox to 1em{\hss. \hss}\hfill} \define[1]\pg{{\switchtobodyfont[10pt]\hfill\at[#1]\crlf}} \startcomponent%\starttext \startCList \sym{} Illustrations and Tables\pg{Illustrations} \sym{} Preface\pg{Preface} \sym{} Acknowledgments\pg{Acknowledgments} \blank[big, fixed] \sym{0

Re: [NTG-context] problem with \sym?

2019-02-03 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
ol_box \strc_itemgroups_make_dest... \strc_itemgroups_start_item ...groups_insert_item                                                 \dostoptagged \ifcondition... \dotagsetitem \sym ..._symbol \startitemgroupitem \dotagsetitem                                                 \s!symbol l.18

[NTG-context] problem with \sym?

2019-02-03 Thread Alan Bowen
e_dest... \strc_itemgroups_start_item ...groups_insert_item \dostoptagged \ifcondition... \dotagsetitem \sym ..._symbol \startitemgroupitem \dotagsetitem \s!symbol l.18 \sym{0.} Prolegomena to the

Re: [NTG-context] start/stopitem and \sym

2011-10-03 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2-10-2011 17:16, Steffen Wolfrum wrote: Hans, when we should use \startitem ... \stopitem now, shouldn't there be a \startsym ... \stopsym too? Steffen, who just had a mixed case: sym and item in one itemize ;o( I've added special item support to the beta \starttext

Re: [NTG-context] start/stopitem and \sym

2011-10-03 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 03.10.2011 um 10:14 schrieb Hans Hagen: On 2-10-2011 17:16, Steffen Wolfrum wrote: Hans, when we should use \startitem ... \stopitem now, shouldn't there be a \startsym ... \stopsym too? Steffen, who just had a mixed case: sym and item in one itemize ;o( I've added

[NTG-context] start/stopitem and \sym

2011-10-02 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Hans, when we should use \startitem ... \stopitem now, shouldn't there be a \startsym ... \stopsym too? Steffen, who just had a mixed case: sym and item in one itemize ;o( ___ If your question is of interest

Re: [NTG-context] about \sym{} and n*broad

2009-09-16 Thread Hans Hagen
Dalyoung wrote: Dear Hans, Thank you for the correction. After swapping first and second as you told, I got the good result. I have another question. If I use 4*broad in the first level itemization, it seems to me that it inherently applied to the second and third level too. Even though I

Re: [NTG-context] about \sym{} and n*broad

2009-09-16 Thread Hans Hagen
Dalyoung wrote: Dear Hans, Thank you for the correction. After swapping first and second as you told, I got the good result. I have another question. If I use 4*broad in the first level itemization, it seems to me that it inherently applied to the second and third level too. Even though I

Re: [NTG-context] about \sym{} and n*broad

2009-09-16 Thread dalyoung
Dear Hans, I downloaded a new beta and test your sample and mine. It works perfectly. Thank you for the prompt fix. Best regards, Dalyoung ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an

Re: [NTG-context] about \sym{} and n*broad

2009-09-15 Thread Jan-Erik Hägglöf
dalyoung skrev: Dear all, I try next code to get the following form of text. \startitemize[4*broad] \sym{Type 1} This is a test. bla bla ...bla bla bla ...bla bla bla \sym{Type 2} This is the second item. bla bla bla ... bla bla bla \stopitemize Type 1 This is a test. bla bla bla

Re: [NTG-context] about \sym{} and n*broad

2009-09-15 Thread Dalyoung
Dear Jan-Erik, I tested your suggestion. Your method produce new line after Type 1, but I want to write Type 1 and This is a test. in the same line. And I have seen 4*broad in an example in the manual. In the example, it is used to set the distance, I think. Thank you. Best regards,

Re: [NTG-context] about \sym{} and n*broad

2009-09-15 Thread Hans Hagen
Dalyoung wrote: Dear Jan-Erik, I tested your suggestion. Your method produce new line after Type 1, but I want to write Type 1 and This is a test. in the same line. And I have seen 4*broad in an example in the manual. In the example, it is used to set the distance, I think. broad seems to

Re: [NTG-context] about \sym{} and n*broad

2009-09-15 Thread Hans Hagen
Dalyoung wrote: I tested your suggestion. Your method produce new line after Type 1, but I want to write Type 1 and This is a test. in the same line. And I have seen 4*broad in an example in the manual. In the example, it is used to set the distance, I think. in strc-itm fix: (swap first

Re: [NTG-context] about \sym{} and n*broad

2009-09-15 Thread Dalyoung
Dear Hans, Thank you for the correction. After swapping first and second as you told, I got the good result. I have another question. If I use 4*broad in the first level itemization, it seems to me that it inherently applied to the second and third level too. Even though I set just serried

[NTG-context] about \sym{} and n*broad

2009-09-14 Thread dalyoung
Dear all, I try next code to get the following form of text. \startitemize[4*broad] \sym{Type 1} This is a test. bla bla ...bla bla bla ...bla bla bla \sym{Type 2} This is the second item. bla bla bla ... bla bla bla \stopitemize Type 1 This is a test. bla bla bla