Re: [NTG-context] Background with rounded corners (Metafun)

> \defineornament >[FrameTitle] >[preset=lefttop] I tried this example and I wonder what the [preset=lefttop] does. Because whatever I fill in for lefttop, the ornament appears always in the topleft corner and nowhere else. Hans van der Meer > On 23 Aug 2017, at 00:50, Aditya

Re: [NTG-context] Obtaining an old standalone

On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Roger Mason wrote: Hi Dalyoung, Jeong Dal writes: I also had a similar problem recently after installing texlive 2017. But it is resolved now by doing the following according to the suggestions: run mtxrun —generate and luatools —generate May be, “

Re: [NTG-context] Obtaining an old standalone

Hi Dalyoung, Jeong Dal writes: > > I also had a similar problem recently after installing texlive 2017. > But it is resolved now by doing the following according to the suggestions: > > run mtxrun —generate and luatools —generate > > May be, “ luatools —generate" is OK. > I am

Re: [NTG-context] mathalignment vs mathmatrix

Hi Henri, I think your code has a problem: the first one is that the definition of \Up and \Down is not understood when I compile your example, and then you introduce an empty mathmatrix which creates a difficulty too. Once I remove the definitions of \Up and \Dn the code is typeset (ConTeXt

Re: [NTG-context] Expandable \doifelse tests

While going through the posts I had stowed away because I found them interesting, I came along this one. There is not a problem here, just a tiny observation. In order to work \doifelse{a}{\doifelse{x}{x}{a}{b}}{yes}{no} properly it is sufficient that the inner \doifelse is of the expandable

Re: [NTG-context] mathalignment vs mathmatrix

You obviously didn't read my first mailing correctly and copied an incomplete version of my MWE. The definitions of \Up and \Dn are right there before \starttext.  Whether the mathmatrix is empty of not does not make a difference.  For the sake of completeness I present you a different MWE