On 23-4-2010 7:37, Denis Bitouzé wrote:
Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 23h32,
Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl a écrit :
btw, in mkiv ppchtex is reimplemented; it still has some flaws but it
has more room for extensions and is now part of the context mkiv
kernel
As I'm not using ConTeXt for the moment (but it
Le vendredi 23/04/10 à 09h34,
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl a écrit :
we have context mkii and context mkiv; the new ppchtex module is for
mkiv and uses a combination of lua, tex and mp; as context and latex
are quite different (and even more when you consider mkiv) the new
ppchtex code targets
Le dimanche 18/04/10 à 23h23,
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl a écrit :
can you check if your ppchtex.noc file has
\input supp-mis.mkii \let\writestatus\undefined
\input syst-gen.mkii
\input syst-fnt.mkii
i.e loads the mkii files?
Yes, those lines are present in the file ppchtex.noc:
Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 13h41,
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl a écrit :
can you download the cont-tmf.zip file and unzip it in the texmd-dist
root?
It works! Well almost: no compilation trouble, but an empty page with
the following MCE:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{etex,m-pictex,m-ch-en}
Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 15h21,
Denis Bitouzé dbito...@wanadoo.fr a écrit :
no compilation trouble
Sorry, no error but the following message in the .log file:
ppchtex: the {}{}-alternative is not permitted here
--
Denis
On 22-4-2010 3:30, Denis Bitouzé wrote:
Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 15h21,
Denis Bitouzédbito...@wanadoo.fr a écrit :
no compilation trouble
Sorry, no error but the following message in the .log file:
ppchtex: the {}{}-alternative is not permitted here
so use the [][] variant instead
Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 16h42,
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl a écrit :
so use the [][] variant instead ({}{} is for inline)
OK, that's better :) But the following MCE:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{etex,m-pictex,m-ch-en}
\begin{document}
\startchemical
\chemical[2H_2,PLUS,O_2,GIVES,2H_2O]
Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 16h51,
Denis Bitouzé dbito...@wanadoo.fr a écrit :
But the following MCE:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{etex,m-pictex,m-ch-en}
\begin{document}
\startchemical
\chemical[2H_2,PLUS,O_2,GIVES,2H_2O]
\stopchemical
\end{document}
leads to the messages:
[...]
On 22-4-2010 7:09, Denis Bitouzé wrote:
Are those changes:
1. {}{} rather than [][],
2. pair \startchemical, \stopchemical or not,
3. etc.
documented somewhere?
sure, in the ppchtex manual; indeed {}{} is used inline (in math mode or
not) and [][] between start/stop pairs
Hans
On 22-4-2010 7:09, Denis Bitouzé wrote:
Are those changes:
1. {}{} rather than [][],
2. pair \startchemical, \stopchemical or not,
3. etc.
btw, in mkiv ppchtex is reimplemented; it still has some flaws but it
has more room for extensions and is now part of the context mkiv kernel
Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 23h32,
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl a écrit :
btw, in mkiv ppchtex is reimplemented; it still has some flaws but it
has more room for extensions and is now part of the context mkiv
kernel
As I'm not using ConTeXt for the moment (but it may change! :), what
are the
Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 23h30,
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl a écrit :
sure, in the ppchtex manual; indeed {}{} is used inline (in math mode
or not) and [][] between start/stop pairs
Well, sorry for my misreading...
--
Denis
On 17-4-2010 11:10, Denis Bitouzé wrote:
Hello,
thanks to contributors of this list I was able to use ppchtex with
LaTeX when I encountered a \writestatus: Undefined control sequence
problem:
http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2009/044672.html
Everything went well (though I have a little
13 matches
Mail list logo