On Thursday 03 of March 2011 03:49:47 Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 02 Mär 2011, Martin Schröder wrote:
*On topic* I'd also _very_ much like to see what's up with ConTeXt
licensing. From what it seems it looks like TeX Live is relicensing
ConTeXt in its
??? How do you come to that
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 22:37, Joseph Wright wrote:
Hello all,
A question came up recently on the tex.sx site about ConTeXt licensing:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/12431/using-context-commercially
I really like the particular answer pointing to bugroff licence:
On Wednesday 02 of March 2011 11:30:03 Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 22:37, Joseph Wright wrote:
Hello all,
A question came up recently on the tex.sx site about ConTeXt licensing:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/12431/using-context-commercially
I really like
2011/3/2 Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com:
I really like the particular answer pointing to bugroff licence:
http://www.reocities.com/SoHo/Cafe/5947/bugroff.html
It's a nice joke, but for practical purposes a one-clause BSD
license allows the same freedoms, but is legally clear.
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:41:58AM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
2011/3/2 Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com:
I really like the particular answer pointing to bugroff licence:
http://www.reocities.com/SoHo/Cafe/5947/bugroff.html
It's a nice joke, but for practical purposes a
2011/3/2 Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org:
I was about to say that, though I'm pro strong copyleft (AKA GPL when
fits) myself, though I highly doubt, for practical reasons ;), that any
one can take a BSD licensed ConTeXt and make a closed source derivative
with any substantial improvement.
Hi,
On 03/02/11 11:41, Martin Schröder wrote:
It's a nice joke, but for practical purposes a one-clause BSD
license allows the same freedoms, but is legally clear.
Same for me, but in collaborative works, that is usually not doable.
Once a single line of a project is GPL-ed, all of it has to
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 12:08:35PM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
2011/3/2 Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org:
I was about to say that, though I'm pro strong copyleft (AKA GPL when
fits) myself, though I highly doubt, for practical reasons ;), that any
one can take a BSD licensed ConTeXt and
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:40, Matija Šuklje wrote:
*On topic* I'd also _very_ much like to see what's up with ConTeXt licensing.
From what it seems it looks like TeX Live is relicensing ConTeXt in its
distribution. And both helping the Gentoo Licensing team and being Deputy
Legal Coordinator
On 2-3-2011 12:10, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi,
On 03/02/11 11:41, Martin Schröder wrote:
It's a nice joke, but for practical purposes a one-clause BSD
license allows the same freedoms, but is legally clear.
Same for me, but in collaborative works, that is usually not doable.
Once a single
On Mi, 02 Mär 2011, Martin Schröder wrote:
*On topic* I'd also _very_ much like to see what's up with ConTeXt licensing.
From what it seems it looks like TeX Live is relicensing ConTeXt in its
??? How do you come to that conclusion?
TeX Live is *NOT* relicensing *anything*. THe REDAME and
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Joseph Wright wrote:
Hello all,
A question came up recently on the tex.sx site about ConTeXt licensing:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/12431/using-context-commercially
I have a feeling I've seen something similar elsewhere recently, but
cannot be sure where.
2011/3/1 Joseph Wright joseph.wri...@morningstar2.co.uk:
This question seems to require an 'official' response, as things do seem
a little confusing (at least to me). I'm happy to post something as a
You won't get a more official response than
You won't get a more official response than
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/mreadme.pdf
. . . and don’t bother discussing licence issues and related things
with us for the mere sake of discussing licence stuff.
If someone wants to use ConTeXt commercially I advise her to
On 1 mrt. 2011, at 22:37, Joseph Wright joseph.wri...@morningstar2.co.uk
wrote:
Hello all,
A question came up recently on the tex.sx site about ConTeXt licensing:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/12431/using-context-commercially
I have a feeling I've seen something similar
15 matches
Mail list logo