Re: [NTG-context] text in mathematics

[Hans Åberg]

> On 9 Jul 2018, at 21:27, Hans Åberg  wrote:
> 
>> On 9 Jul 2018, at 17:48, Aditya Mahajan  wrote:
>> 
>> On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> 
>>> On 8 Jul 2018, at 23:00, Otared Kavian  wrote:
 The advantage being that if the above formula appears in an environment 
 such as a Theorem (where the text is typeset in italic, or slanted) the 
 text in the above \mbox will be also in italic or slanted.
>>> 
>>> Math displayed formula text inheriting the style of the text appears in two 
>>> books from first published in 1966 and 1980 that I checked.
>>> 
>>> So a math text command should probably support that style.
>> 
>> IIRC, that is also the case for the \text command in amsmath.
> 
> There might be two commands, one that inherits the text environment style, 
> and one that keeps it in normal.

Also math and code (verbatim) might appear nested in Hoare logic and such.


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] text in mathematics

[Hans Åberg]

> On 9 Jul 2018, at 17:48, Aditya Mahajan  wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Hans Åberg wrote:
> 
>> On 8 Jul 2018, at 23:00, Otared Kavian  wrote:
>>> The advantage being that if the above formula appears in an environment 
>>> such as a Theorem (where the text is typeset in italic, or slanted) the 
>>> text in the above \mbox will be also in italic or slanted.
>> 
>> Math displayed formula text inheriting the style of the text appears in two 
>> books from first published in 1966 and 1980 that I checked.
>> 
>> So a math text command should probably support that style.
> 
> IIRC, that is also the case for the \text command in amsmath.

There might be two commands, one that inherits the text environment style, and 
one that keeps it in normal.


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] text in mathematics

[Aditya Mahajan]

On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Hans Åberg wrote:




On 8 Jul 2018, at 23:00, Otared Kavian  wrote:

The advantage being that if the above formula appears in an environment such as 
a Theorem (where the text is typeset in italic, or slanted) the text in the 
above \mbox will be also in italic or slanted.


Math displayed formula text inheriting the style of the text appears in two 
books from first published in 1966 and 1980 that I checked.

So a math text command should probably support that style.


IIRC, that is also the case for the \text command in amsmath.

Aditya___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] text in mathematics

[Hans Hagen]

On 7/9/2018 11:39 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:

Hi Alan,

you should at least limit the scope of the command to math mode

\appendtoks
     \let\t\mathtext
     \let\w\mathword
\to \everymathematics

something

\ifdefined\t \else \unexpanded\def\t{\mathortext\text\mathtext} \fi
\ifdefined\w \else \unexpanded\def\w{\mathortext\word\mathword} \fi

\appendtoks
\let\t\mathtext
\let\w\mathword
\to \everymathematics

because sometimes a \t or \w is part of an expansion so we need it to be 
defined then (for instance, Alan loves to put lots of complex math in 
textext)


Hans


-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
   tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] text in mathematics

[Hans Åberg]

> On 8 Jul 2018, at 23:00, Otared Kavian  wrote:
> 
> The advantage being that if the above formula appears in an environment such 
> as a Theorem (where the text is typeset in italic, or slanted) the text in 
> the above \mbox will be also in italic or slanted.

Math displayed formula text inheriting the style of the text appears in two 
books from first published in 1966 and 1980 that I checked.

So a math text command should probably support that style.


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] text in mathematics

[Wolfgang Schuster]

Hi Alan,

you should at least limit the scope of the command to math mode

\appendtoks
\let\t\mathtext
\let\w\mathword
\to \everymathematics

Wolfgang

Alan Braslau 
8. Juli 2018 um 23:11
In many "less-rigorous" uses of equations, there is an abundant need
to include words (text) in mathematics, and using \mathtext{} or \mbox{}
or whatever is unwieldy.

Readable subscripts, self-explanatory variable names, etc. might be
text and not symbols. These situations can be very common. This is why I
asked (1) what is the right method, and (2) what do others think about
the shorthand \t{}, similar to the shorthand \m{}?

Alan


On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 23:00:00 +0200

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry 
to the Wiki!


maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / 
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] text in mathematics

[Alan Braslau]

In many "less-rigorous" uses of equations, there is an abundant need
to include words (text) in mathematics, and using \mathtext{} or \mbox{}
or whatever is unwieldy.

Readable subscripts, self-explanatory variable names, etc. might be
text and not symbols. These situations can be very common. This is why I
asked (1) what is the right method, and (2) what do others think about
the shorthand \t{}, similar to the shorthand \m{}?

Alan


On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 23:00:00 +0200
Otared Kavian  wrote:

> Hi Alan, Wolfgang and Hans Åberg,
> 
> As far as I am concerned, when I have to add a text to a math formula
> I use \mbox, as in the example
> 
> \startformula
> A := \left\{f : {\Bbb R}^2 \longrightarrow {\Bbb R} \; ; \; f
> \mbox{ is measurable and }  \int_{{\Bbb R}^2}|f(x)|dx < \infty
> \right\}. \stopformula
> 
> The advantage being that if the above formula appears in an
> environment such as a Theorem (where the text is typeset in italic,
> or slanted) the text in the above \mbox will be also in italic or
> slanted.
> 
> I don't think it would be a good idea to add new commands to treat
> text in a math formula: the existing possiblities are more than
> satisfactory, and moreover situations where one has to add text to a
> formula are not that common. So using a command like \mbox, or \text,
> or \mathtext, or whatever, is not that time consuming.
> 
> Best regards: OK
> 
> 
> > On 8 Jul 2018, at 21:21, Wolfgang Schuster
> >  wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Alan,
> > 
> > 1. The correct way to use \mathrm is {\mathrm ...} because it is a
> > switch like \rm for text mode.
> > 
> > 2. \mathrm is the wrong method to write text in formulas because
> > the command changes only the math alphabet. This means no
> > ligatures, kerning or other characters like umlauts.
> > 
> > 3. The correct way to write text in math mode is \mathtext (which
> > has the synonym \text) or \mathword. To change the style of the
> > text you can use \mathtext{\it …} or \mathtextit{…}.
> > 
> > Wolfgang  
> >> Alan Braslau  7. Juli 2018 um
> >> 16:04 Hello ConTeXt users,
> >> 
> >> Does it drive you crazy to see TeX users write $t = time$?
> >> (I see this all of the time by LaTeX users in Beamer
> >> presentations.)
> >> 
> >> One can do better writing $t = {\rm time}$ (maybe)
> >> or in ConTeXt $t = \mathrm{time}$.
> >> Sometimes, too, I might write $t = \text{time}$.
> >> 
> >> We also have the commands \mathematics{} that can be used in place
> >> of the TeX shorthand $...$, and this also has the shortcut \m{...}.
> >> 
> >> I thought that it might be useful to have an equivalent escape, to
> >> be used as $t = \t{time}$. What do other users think?
> >> 
> >> OK, \m{t = \t{time}} might be a bit funky... 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Alan
> >> 
> >> 
> >> P.S. I proposed doing this via
> >> \let\t\mathrm
> >> but Hans tells me that this is not good, as \mathrm{} does not give
> >> proper font processing, so implementation of \t{} would be
> >> something different...
> >> ___
> >> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
> >> entry to the Wiki!
> >> 
> >> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl  /
> >> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> >>  webpage :
> >> http://www.pragma-ade.nl  /
> >> http://context.aanhet.net  archive :
> >> https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
> >>  wiki :
> >> http://contextgarden.net 
> >> ___
> >>   
> > 
> > ___
> > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
> > entry to the Wiki!
> > 
> > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
> > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage  :
> > http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive  :
> > https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki :
> > http://contextgarden.net
> > ___
> >   
> 

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] text in mathematics

[Otared Kavian]

Hi Alan, Wolfgang and Hans Åberg,

As far as I am concerned, when I have to add a text to a math formula I use 
\mbox, as in the example

\startformula
A := \left\{f : {\Bbb R}^2 \longrightarrow {\Bbb R} \; ; \; f \mbox{ is 
measurable and }  \int_{{\Bbb R}^2}|f(x)|dx < \infty \right\}.
\stopformula

The advantage being that if the above formula appears in an environment such as 
a Theorem (where the text is typeset in italic, or slanted) the text in the 
above \mbox will be also in italic or slanted.

I don't think it would be a good idea to add new commands to treat text in a 
math formula: the existing possiblities are more than satisfactory, and 
moreover situations where one has to add text to a formula are not that common. 
So using a command like \mbox, or \text, or \mathtext, or whatever, is not that 
time consuming.

Best regards: OK


> On 8 Jul 2018, at 21:21, Wolfgang Schuster  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alan,
> 
> 1. The correct way to use \mathrm is {\mathrm ...} because it is a switch 
> like \rm for text mode.
> 
> 2. \mathrm is the wrong method to write text in formulas because the command 
> changes only the math alphabet. This means no ligatures, kerning or other 
> characters like umlauts.
> 
> 3. The correct way to write text in math mode is \mathtext (which has the 
> synonym \text) or \mathword. To change the style of the text you can use 
> \mathtext{\it …} or \mathtextit{…}.
> 
> Wolfgang
>> Alan Braslau  7. Juli 2018 um 16:04
>> Hello ConTeXt users,
>> 
>> Does it drive you crazy to see TeX users write $t = time$?
>> (I see this all of the time by LaTeX users in Beamer presentations.)
>> 
>> One can do better writing $t = {\rm time}$ (maybe)
>> or in ConTeXt $t = \mathrm{time}$.
>> Sometimes, too, I might write $t = \text{time}$.
>> 
>> We also have the commands \mathematics{} that can be used in place of
>> the TeX shorthand $...$, and this also has the shortcut \m{...}.
>> 
>> I thought that it might be useful to have an equivalent escape, to be
>> used as $t = \t{time}$. What do other users think?
>> 
>> OK, \m{t = \t{time}} might be a bit funky... 
>> 
>> 
>> Alan
>> 
>> 
>> P.S. I proposed doing this via
>> \let\t\mathrm
>> but Hans tells me that this is not good, as \mathrm{} does not give
>> proper font processing, so implementation of \t{} would be something
>> different...
>> ___
>> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to 
>> the Wiki!
>> 
>> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl  / 
>> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context 
>> 
>> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl  / 
>> http://context.aanhet.net 
>> archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ 
>> 
>> wiki : http://contextgarden.net 
>> ___
> 
> ___
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
> Wiki!
> 
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
> archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] text in mathematics

[Wolfgang Schuster]

Hi Alan,

1. The correct way to use \mathrm is {\mathrm ...} because it is a 
switch like \rm for text mode.


2. \mathrm is the wrong method to write text in formulas because the 
command changes only the math alphabet. This means no ligatures, kerning 
or other characters like umlauts.


3. The correct way to write text in math mode is \mathtext (which has 
the synonym \text) or \mathword. To change the style of the text you can 
use \mathtext{\it …} or \mathtextit{…}.


Wolfgang

Alan Braslau 
7. Juli 2018 um 16:04
Hello ConTeXt users,

Does it drive you crazy to see TeX users write $t = time$?
(I see this all of the time by LaTeX users in Beamer presentations.)

One can do better writing $t = {\rm time}$ (maybe)
or in ConTeXt $t = \mathrm{time}$.
Sometimes, too, I might write $t = \text{time}$.

We also have the commands \mathematics{} that can be used in place of
the TeX shorthand $...$, and this also has the shortcut \m{...}.

I thought that it might be useful to have an equivalent escape, to be
used as $t = \t{time}$. What do other users think?

OK, \m{t = \t{time}} might be a bit funky...


Alan


P.S. I proposed doing this via
\let\t\mathrm
but Hans tells me that this is not good, as \mathrm{} does not give
proper font processing, so implementation of \t{} would be something
different...
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry 
to the Wiki!


maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / 
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] text in mathematics

[Hans Åberg]

> On 7 Jul 2018, at 16:04, Alan Braslau  wrote:

> Does it drive you crazy to see TeX users write $t = time$?
> (I see this all of the time by LaTeX users in Beamer presentations.)
> 
> One can do better writing $t = {\rm time}$ (maybe)
> or in ConTeXt $t = \mathrm{time}$.
> Sometimes, too, I might write $t = \text{time}$.

The last would be easiest to remember when using it less often. Strictly, it is 
different, because it could mean italics, as may be used in formulas. The 
upright letters are called normal here:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_Alphanumeric_Symbols

> We also have the commands \mathematics{} that can be used in place of
> the TeX shorthand $...$, and this also has the shortcut \m{...}.
> 
> I thought that it might be useful to have an equivalent escape, to be
> used as $t = \t{time}$. What do other users think?
> 
> OK, \m{t = \t{time}} might be a bit funky... 

If one is using italics for text in math formulas, that would be logical.


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___