Dan,
FYI, ntop (like Apache) produce a log file (ntop.access.log) where are
listed the IP addresses of the clients.
Cheers, Luca
Dan Tucny wrote:
Hi,
I've had a number of connection attempts to port 3000 on my mail
host... I'm assuming it's someone who gets this list and is going
TED]
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2000 2:04 AM
Subject: Re: Connection attempts
From: "Dan Tucny" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 23:45:03 -
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_NextPart_000_010A_01C071F1.5D87C5D0"
X-Priority: 3
. There's no reason why he should owe you an
apology.
Sorry, not true.
##
I've had a number of connection attempts to port 3000 on my mail host... =
I'm assuming it's someone who gets this list and is going through =
looking
Hi,
I've had a number of connection attempts to port
3000 on my mail host... I'm assuming it's someone who gets this list and is
going through looking for ntop hosts...
If this was innocently wanting to check out a
working ntop, then fine, but if this was an attempt to kill my ntop
2400
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--=_NextPart_000_010A_01C071F1.5D87C5D0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I've had a number of connection attempt
-
From: "Anthony David" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2000 2:04 AM
Subject: Re: Connection attempts
From: "Dan Tucny" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 23:45:03 -
Content-Type: multipart/alt
On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Dan Tucny wrote:
Chill out...
That applies to both of you. :-)
Dan, there's no sign of someone wanting to compromise your system, or even
exploit ntop, from a mere connection attempt. That can mean so many things
that you can assume it means nothing. It's perfectly normal
