Re: [Ntop] Bogus wrong netmask or bridging enabled

2003-11-24 Thread Tomas Charvat
what about -o ?


- Original Message - 
From: Ted Kaczmarek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 12:33 PM
Subject: [Ntop] Bogus wrong netmask or bridging enabled


 Does ntop need to be told what size each subnet is? I am seeing 
 wrong network mask or bridging enabled for every machine in one
 broadcast domain that is a 24 bit 10.X.X.X. 
 
 Thanks,
 Ted
 ___
 Ntop mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

___
Ntop mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop


[Ntop] greeting

2003-11-17 Thread Tomas Charvat
.. guys

i have one router, whitch have few subnets like
(172.20.4.0/24,172.20.5.0/24)
but there is a lot of other hosts in other networks like 172.20.3.0/24
172.20.13.0/24 behind other routers.

and my problem is that even when i run
ntop -g -E --http-server 3000 --https-server 0 -i wlan1,eth0,wlan0,wlan2 -u
nobody --reuse-rrd-graphics  -m 172.20.0.0/255.255.0.0

i can not see all hosts, whitch make traffic accross the network
well i see 1 host , whitch is 2 hops away from monitoring router
(172.20.13.0/24) but i cant see host whitch is only 1 hop away from that
rooter from 172.20.3.0/24

and im checking it in IP Traffic  L - L

indeed my googling did fail ...

there is about 40 hosts in whole network choped into 20 subnets, whitch all
belong to 172.20.0.0/16


i will apriciate any tip

thanks for a great tool :)
regards
tomas charvat


___
Ntop mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop


[Ntop] ntop

2003-11-17 Thread Tomas Charvat
hallo i found your old message



I am having problems with the -m flag

Here is my command line...

/usr/local/bin/ntop -i eth1 -d -w 3000 -m
10.0.0.0/8,192.168.0.0/16

I have been having this problem ever since I been using 2.0 (starting at
beta 3)...Now the funny part is I've been using ntop 1.3.2 with those
same command line parameters above and it works fine...in fact it's been
working fine quite a while now...

My question is, has the -m syntax changed since 1.3.2 and the man page
just hasn't been updated...or is this a bug?

I know that I can apply a filter such as 'net 10.0.0.0/8 and
192.168.0.0/16' but I would like to have all hosts and just separate
local networks using the -m flagAny help would be grateful

--Dan

P.S. Kick ass application
**

i have some problems that ntop doesnt see all my hosts while i use -m .. 
did anybody help you with your issue ?

regards 
tomas

___
Ntop mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop


[Ntop] problem solved

2003-11-17 Thread Tomas Charvat
im sorry for second email, it was an acident

i solved my problem '-o' is the key.

so have a good time all

regards
tomas


___
Ntop mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop