It's out.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/srd/archive/2013/11/12/introducing-enhanced-mitigation-experience-toolkit-emet-4-1.aspx
I downloaded the drivers for redhat 4 and 5, maybe i'm selecting the wrong
version of Linux?
the tool is pretty straight forward in directions, press F to fetch drivers
from usb or floppy-
One thing i noticed on the screen when fetching the drivers is that it says
looking for driver*zip, yet
I'm not surprised...
Have you read the FAQ for the tool on this? It needs the linux drivers
(not Windows, obviously), but even if that's what you did, the FAQ
suggests that it's not necessarily going to work... in many cases he has
to add them to the tool... and he asks that people not email
HIRENs boot cd didnt find windows either
Jean-Paul Natola
From: jnat...@hotmail.com
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] OMSALIVE equivalent for HP
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 09:23:24 -0500
I downloaded the drivers for redhat 4 and 5, maybe
What is the RAID level of the volume from which you're trying to grab data?
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:41 AM, J- P jnat...@hotmail.com wrote:
HIRENs boot cd didnt find windows either
Jean-Paul Natola
--
From: jnat...@hotmail.com
To:
I.m not sure to be honest, the controller is saying that 2 drives are in a RAID
1+0 , how is that possible with only 2 drives??(Maybe an HP marketing tactic)-
lets not loose sight of the thread here, the other 3 drives show to be in a
raid 5 -
My assumption is that the sqlexpress database is
Ok so i used the sticky keys exploit and created an account, but when I logged
im not a local admin -
just a regular user
Jean-Paul Natola
From: jnat...@hotmail.com
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] OMSALIVE equivalent for HP
Date:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:38 AM, J- P jnat...@hotmail.com wrote:
I.m not sure to be honest, the controller is saying that 2 drives are in a
RAID 1+0 , how is that possible with only 2 drives??
I suppose the RAID implementation might be treating it as RAID 1+0
with only one member mirrorset.
Looking for real-world solution sizing for a Sonic Wall firewall. Site has
about 1500-2500 devices/nodes and has a 200Mb internet pipe currently (which
may increase up to 500Mb in the next 3 years). Rather than speak with Sonic
Wall sales who will push me into some high-end device that is
I use them, but my environment is much smaller. We're stuck in the NSA 2XX
range for cost reasons, but I wish I could jump up a notch or two for
performance.
I think the key is what features you'll be using and what throughput the
firewall can manage when using them. IIRC, the big performance
Thanks for the tips. Right now I am leaning towards a NSA 250M or the NSA 2400.
I checked the current firewall (Microsoft TMG) and it's showing 23,000 active
connections. There wouldn't be a need for content filtering or anti-spam
filtering, etc. as other services are used for that.
Does
Frankly, no, given your 200Mbps link (that may go up to 500)[1].
See the following for theoretical maximum throughput numbers.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Jesse Rink
jr...@sourceonetechnology.comwrote:
Thanks for the tips. Right now I am leaning towards a NSA 250M or the
NSA 2400.
Let me try that again...
--
Frankly, no, given your 200Mbps link (that may go up to 500)[1].
See the following for theoretical maximum throughput numbers.
http://www.sonicwall.com/us/en/products/NSA_Series.html#tab=compare
The 220 maxes out at 115 Mbps when doing anti-malware inspection.
And, it should be affected, not effected.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chris John Riley chris.ri...@c22.cc
Date: Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 1:55 AM
Subject: LastPass Android container PIN and auto-wipe security feature
bypass (CVE-2013-5113/5114)
To: bugt...@securityfocus.com
What wouldn't meet the needs with the 2400? It shows the following specs:
775Mb firewall inspection throughput
225,000 active connections
4000 new connections/sec.
The site currently is using:
200Mb pipe (potential to grow to 300-500 in the next 3 years)
23,000 active connections
250
I was just handed a box by our Document Control manager, which she
found while cleaning out an old cabinet.
It's red, and says ELS Netware 286 Level I Kit
It's got all the disks and manuals.
Kinda cool...
Kurt
I was assuming you would use some of the UTM features. If not, then I would
guess your analysis is correct.
(But perhaps at the risk of staying off topic, why wouldn't you use gateway
AV and IPS if they're baked into the device?)
On Nov 13, 2013 2:55 PM, Jesse Rink jr...@sourceonetechnology.com
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9244015/Microsoft_abandons_employee_ranking_system
and
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9244034/Microsoft_No_we_re_not_ditching_on_premise_Exchange
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9244015/Microsoft_abandons_employee_ranking_system
and
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9244034/Microsoft_No_we_re_not_ditching_on_premise_Exchange
They're not going to concede (that easily) the on-premise messaging market
to the host of open-source solutions that are already making somewhat of an
inroads...
*ASB **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker
*Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations Information
They're not going to concede (that easily) the on-premise messaging market
to the host of open-source solutions that are already making somewhat of an
inroads...
*ASB **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker
*Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations Information
I wouldn't read too much into the Exchange article. Especially considering how
badly Exchange stability has sucked in the last year, and the number of take
backs for on-premises feature content in Exchange 2013.
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
I wouldn't read too much into the Exchange article. Especially considering how
badly Exchange stability has sucked in the last year, and the number of take
backs for on-premises feature content in Exchange 2013.
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
VMware converter?
(sent from a mobile device)
On Nov 13, 2013, at 7:00 PM, J- P
jnat...@hotmail.commailto:jnat...@hotmail.com wrote:
hi all,
First off thanks for all the feedback on getting me into the locked out server-
it turns out the application they need to get historical data from is
Are the disks 5-1/4 or 8 ???
:)
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Kurt Buff
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 3:34 PM
To: NTSysADM@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] I wonder if I should put this up on
+1
7 years ago we had a local physician pass away. He had written his own
EMR(Electronic health record) system. It sat on a humongous HP Proliant server
and it is a 2003 domain controller as well. Long story short, we acquired his
patients and some to this day will still come by and want their
Some 5.25, others 3.5.
I nearly break out into giggles every time I look at it.
Kurt
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Erik Goldoff egold...@gmail.com wrote:
Are the disks 5-1/4 or 8 ???
:)
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
My guess would be either 5.25 or 3.5 since they are for the 286 machines. That
is only a guess, not even educated at that.
Jon
From: egold...@gmail.com
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] I wonder if I should put this up on ebay...
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 20:16:49
+1 on doable but I don't know of the tools outside of those available for
System Center to get it to Hyper-V.
Jon
From: d...@parkviewmc.com
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] hyperv on pc-
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 01:42:52 +
+1
7 years ago we had a local
Converter can create an OVA which you can bring into hyper-v. Though if you
have system center VMM has a great p2v component.
(sent from a mobile device)
On Nov 13, 2013, at 9:42 PM, Jon Harris
jk.har...@live.commailto:jk.har...@live.com wrote:
+1 on doable but I don't know of the tools
so that means i will have to setup a vmware host at the clients site?
can i do that on regular pc/laptop?
i only know/use hyperv
Jean-Paul Natola
From: d...@parkviewmc.com
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] hyperv on pc-
Date: Thu, 14 Nov
i have windows 95 floppies :)
Jean-Paul Natola
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:32:42 -0800
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] I wonder if I should put this up on ebay...
From: kurt.b...@gmail.com
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Some 5.25, others 3.5.
I nearly break
Just released today!
http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2013/11/amazon-workspaces-desktop-computing-in-th
e-cloud.html
And who will answer the telephone when user-x has an issue?
and more importantly- who else will have access to the VPC- NSA/CIA/DHS?
still not sold- 50 per months x 36 = 1800- i can get a nice optiplex or hp
with office for less
just my .02
Jean-Paul Natola
matter of fact- for 1800, i can my user a desktop and laptop
Jean-Paul Natola
From: jnat...@hotmail.com
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Bye Citrix
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 23:39:38 -0500
And who will answer the telephone when user-x
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Steven M. Caesare
scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
I have .MP3's of Apple ][ cassettes that will work in an emu!
Interesting. I actually would have expected the MP3 compression to
screw up the encoding.
-- Ben
Yeah, but that $1800 is CAPEX, not OPEX.
And if you have variable staff (call centres during Christmas rush), then this
model means you only pay for what you need, when you need it i.e. not $1800
over 36 months. Your model means you pay $1800 for each pax at peak time, and
have surplus assets
Notes sync is part of the ActiveSync spec.
If your device doesn't sync notes, then it hasn't implemented that part of the
spec
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd633485(v=exchg.80).aspx
Cheers
Ken
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of
I recall ther is something about note not implemented in OWA 2010 and so
probably also on devices
Guido Elia
HELPPC - HELPPC SERVICE
Da: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] Per
conto di Ken Schaefer
Inviato: giovedì 14 novembre
39 matches
Mail list logo