Situation 1 - service program expired
Situation 2 - disk failure
Question - can a disk from a decommissioned RAID appliance (NetApp FAS-2050) be
used as a spare on an identical unit?
We have two identical NetApp FAS-2050 appliances (2 controllers in each). We
decommissioned one of them in
Hi all,
We are deploying a synology with 12tb or storage and we were wondering if
anyone has opted to use the Cloudstation in lieu of commercial services, and
how it stacks up?
I personally do not use ANY cloud services (call me paranoid) but thats just me.
This article which is a year old
I've been looking and while I've found these fields referred to I've yet to
find a description of them and their values.
In the Microsoft CA interface (I'm on 2003 but it's the same in 2012) there are
two columns: Request Flags and Request Type. The majority of the first is 4
with some showing
I know and understand that whitelisting applications is the most secure
approach, but that's not really under my purview and I don't think there would
be much support for it. I also understand that PDF's can be malicious, but I
am also not going to get any support for blocking PDFs. If I
To add to what Ben has said, a typical VoIP call on my network averages
about 16-20kbps. I've had VoIP since 2004, using 2 different providers,
and I've been able to control the quality with QoS on my end almost that
whole period.
I did have a couple of ISP related issues which undermine call
Maybe something DNS related? A DNS resolution timeout would be consistent with
a 10-20 second delay.
Edward
--
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of elsalvoz
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 1:58 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Have you ever tested your line with pingtest.net?
--
Espi
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Christopher Bodnar
christopher_bod...@glic.com wrote:
OT here, but thought I'd ask anyway.
I've got cable modem at home, 25 down/ 2 up. Also have MagicJack for
VoIP. I've always had issues with
OT here, but thought I'd ask anyway.
I've got cable modem at home, 25 down/ 2 up. Also have MagicJack for VoIP.
I've always had issues with voice quality on the other end of the voice call,
not just with MagicJack but other VoIP providers as well, and I know it's due
to the low upload speeds
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Jon Harris jk.har...@live.com wrote:
At this point I will lose nothing by breaking it open. It is a sealed
plastic unit so opening it is not going to be fun ...
That is why God gave man Dremel. ;-)
Once you've got it open, you can look at drilling holes
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Christopher Bodnar
christopher_bod...@glic.com wrote:
I’ve got cable modem at home, 25 down/ 2 up. Also have
MagicJack for VoIP. I’ve always had issues with voice quality
on the other end of the voice call, not just with MagicJack but
other VoIP providers as
Just a thought: if the goal is to prevent malicious software from running via
Chrome, perhaps implementing application whitelisting in Windows may avoid the
need to block running items from Chrome? This will allow things like PDFs to
run, and will still prevent malicious software from running.
PDFs *are* malicious software, containing, among other things,
javascript and other nastiness embedded in them.
Kurt
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Aakash Shah aakash.s...@uci.edu wrote:
Just a thought: if the goal is to prevent malicious software from running via
Chrome, perhaps
Based on guidelines from the NSA, I setup a set of policies for Chrome that we
deploy through GP. One of those policies blocks Chrome from opening files on
the local drive. The problem we have encountered is that sometimes when people
click a PDF on a web site, it downloads to the computer
That's a great suggestions.
This is a new environment I started working at and there is certainly DNS
issues here. I will look into that path as well.
Cesar
On Feb 23, 2015 1:37 PM, Edward Berner bern...@yosemite.edu wrote:
Maybe something DNS related? A DNS resolution timeout would be
Thinking it over it can't be DNS, I'm using IP addresses in the URL
address and still slow. Great suggestion though.
Cesar
On Feb 23, 2015 2:44 PM, elsalvoz elsal...@gmail.com wrote:
That's a great suggestions.
This is a new environment I started working at and there is certainly DNS
issues
To me 100 degrees Fahrenheit is cool in computer terms. Desktop video cards
regularly run at 100 degrees Celsius under stress and this is considered normal
operating conditions. My desktop RAID card also had a safe operating temp rage
between 55 and 100 degrees Celsius.
Having said that, many
apologies, havent read every thread, but have you done a netmon trace ?, that's
where I start when when there are signs of network problems
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Troubleshooting HTTPS slow traffic. Dell iDRAC
From: elsal...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 18:50:21 -0800
To:
There are two kinds of network guys; the ones who listen carefully and just go
fix it (hey! It just started working!) and the ones who want you to prove
it's their baby that's ugly.
Which do you have there?
On Feb 23, 2015, at 18:51, CESAR.ABREG0 elsal...@gmail.com wrote:
Got ya.
Yes,
I know,what tracert is; I used way too few words to ask the OP if he had done a
tracert.
On Feb 23, 2015, at 18:22, CESAR.ABREG0 elsal...@gmail.com wrote:
My mistake I meant to write 'tracer or trace route'
Cesar A.
Meaning is NOT in words, but inside people! Dr. Myles Munroe.
On Feb
Got ya.
Yes, I've done trace route and there is no delays on it or ICMP returns.
This also sent me to theorize on firewall/proxy some how grabbing the request
and delaying it.
I just don't want to stand in front of the network security guys and just say
'I think your firewall rules are
Tracert?
On Feb 23, 2015, at 15:14, Edward Berner bern...@yosemite.edu wrote:
In theory it could still be the other end doing a reverse lookup, but I don't
know whether DRACs do that, especially for the web interface.
Or maybe something in the middle. I think you mentioned a proxy and a
LOL! That's a good one and have worked with both kinds in the past so I just
try doing my due diligence a head of time.
To be honest I don't know yet, just started working in this environment a
couple of months back so have not had a chance to work with them yet, this will
be an introduction.
We believe is related to firewall or proxy since we have no problem
opening the same URL/IP from a server on a different network. It opens
instantly.
Are there any other webpages/services on that netowrk (where the drac is) that
you can test ?
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Troubleshooting
Wireshark/Netmon are basically the same thing.
You can either post the Wireshark log if you're not confident of interpreting
it yourself or use a browser-based tool like Fiddler to see if there's anything
it can tell you.
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
Tcp.port==443, or you can just use: ssl to filter for ssl/tls traffic
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of CESAR.ABREG0
Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2015 3:00 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Troubleshooting HTTPS slow
My mistake I meant to write 'tracer or trace route'
Cesar A.
Meaning is NOT in words, but inside people! Dr. Myles Munroe.
On Feb 23, 2015, at 6:04 PM, Daniel Chenault dani...@hotmail.com wrote:
Tracert?
On Feb 23, 2015, at 15:14, Edward Berner bern...@yosemite.edu wrote:
In theory it
In theory it could still be the other end doing a reverse lookup, but I don't
know whether DRACs do that, especially for the web interface.
Or maybe something in the middle. I think you mentioned a proxy and a
firewall? In theory either of those could be doing DNS lookups, although I
suspect
27 matches
Mail list logo
