Late to the party here, but note that the first three ports on the
SonicWall NSA240 (labeled X0, X1, X2) are 1000 Mbps, not 10/100. It's in
the Getting Started Guide (
http://www.sonicwall.com/downloads/SonicWALL_NSA_240_Getting_Started_Guide.pdf
) as well as labeled that way on the front.
I
I've got a DS414 and a DS214. The DS414 has four 4TB WD Red 5400 drives (
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00EHBERSE/ref=pe_385040_30332200_TE_item) and
the DS214 has two 6TB WD Red drives (
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00LO3KR96/ref=pe_385040_30332190_TE_3p_dp_1),
the same model you are considering.
You can set the versioning to 0 in the latest builds of the DSM software
(5.1+) and turn it off. Synolgy claims they started doing differential
versions back in Aug 2013. See 2013/08/27 notes here:
https://www.synology.com/en-us/releaseNote/CloudStation (Historical file
versions will save
http://www.zdnet.com/article/why-raid-5-stops-working-in-2009/
It claims a 50% chance of rebuild failure in a RAID5 array with 7 1-TB
drives. Your disks are only 500GB, but there are 8 of them. Someone else
will have to do the math on that. The consensus starting several years
ago (the
I've used it for years, but for backup imaging and not imaging new
machines. Been very happy with it for what I use it for (several 2012 R2
servers and a few critical workstations). Images can be mounted as drives
in another system and individual files restored from any of the backups.
Full
I second looking into this. We have a 20-year old Epson Perfection 1640SU
with a document feeder that has no drivers from the manufacturer for
current operating systems. Under the "downloads" section of the Epson
support site it actually suggests VueScan and gives a link to the
Hamrick.com
https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/stdqry/2012/04/03/dhcp-server-in-dcs-and-dns-registrations/
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd334715(v=ws.10).aspx
This is what we've done with DHCP on DC. Have a user "DHCP_user" in
Protected User group, DNSUpdateProxy group. Use this for
In a discussion on Technet, someone converted the PS script to EXE. No PS
version dependancy at all. Alternative approach, arguably better
portability. Discussion here:
https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/Speculation-Control-e36f0050/view/Discussions/3
To trust or not trust,
"...The effects are still being benchmarked, however we're looking at a
ballpark figure of five to 30 per cent slow down, depending on the task
and the processor model..."
PostgreSQL: 10%-23% slowdown.
Wow. That is not trivial.
From: Kurt Buff
To: ntsysadm
9 matches
Mail list logo