Don't know how big an org you are, but on one secure account we worked on
admin access was leased to users on request by a backbone security team.
The admin acccounts for users which had rights to workstations or servers as
required were disabled until requested through a helpdesk case, and when
Thanks!
From: !Amado Abenojar [mailto:abe9...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Changing Account Settings en Masse
Try dsquery and pipe it into dsmod in the command line.
i.e.
dsquery user OU=Employees, DC=Domain, DC=Com
Usually backreving the database to an earlier version SP4 to SP3a, isn't
the issue it's the reverse that is the issue going from SP3a to SP4. I
would look at the SP4 release notes and see if there was any schema
changes accordingly, that might not be present in SP3a that would cause
you a bit of
John
It sounds like you do not like the command line. There are a few other
options for this. I am assuming you are running 2003. Using DSA you can
highlight multiple users in a OU and make this change. You could also create
a search query for user objects and highlight the ones you want and make
Has anybody used one of these for International users? We just bought
for testing purposes and it seems too good to be true. The call quality
is actually pretty excellent.
http://www.magicjack.com/
---
Jason Morris
MJMC, Inc.
jmor...@mjmc.com
P:
I'm okay with a command line (I grew up in the days of DOS), but given a choice
I generally prefer a GUI.
Of course, there are some tasks that just don't lend themselves easily to GUIs.
From: KenM [mailto:kenmli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 8:34 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
I don't have direct knowledge/experience, but...
The technology experts for the CPA Association our firm is a member of are
very fond of MagicJack, and IIRC, they have mentioned some firms are using
these internationally.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Jason Morris jmor...@mjmc.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
Im sorry, but im gonna have to be a little vague here:
I have a new 2008 standard server, that has been (successfully) set up as a
TS on a small domain.
There is an app that a 3rd party is installing that uses a database server
for its data, and the client program connects to said
I have heard nothing but bad things about Magic Jack.
A quick Google will dig up a lot of pissed off customers.
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 9:20 AM
To: NT System Admin
Did you check Windows Firewall (or Windows Firewall with Advanced Security)?
If that is still on, look in event viewer, Windows Logs, Security for Failure
Audits from the Filtering Platform to see what might be getting blocked.
As for dcom, I haven't messed with it too much in WS08 yet, but
Hit send too soon again-going to be one of those days.
After changing dcom permissions at the default My computer level, you may
also need to change them on the properties of the specific object under
\Component Services\Computer\My Computer\DCOM Config under the Security tab.
Hopefully you
Which may or may not be representative of people's overall experiences, since
folks are generally more likely to complain about something than to say good
things about it.
From: Steven Calvanese [mailto:scalvan...@membersolutions.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 9:48 AM
To: NT System
I have quite a few home people who use it, and have mixed reviews with
it. To not working at all for days to best thing they ever bought.
Nothing I would put in a business production environment though..
GReg
From: Steven Calvanese [mailto:scalvan...@membersolutions.com]
Sent: Thursday,
I have not heard of this product and after reading the reviews: the
weight favors toward BAD, but who's to say if this product doesn't work
properly. Their website looks a little jumpy and flashy but personally,
I wouldn't go this route. I probably would stick with skype or vonage.
Thomas
Hi,
All windows firewalls/ avd firewalls are off, as is the SEP.
Gavin.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Miller Bonnie L.
mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu wrote:
Hit send too soon again—going to be one of those days.
After changing dcom permissions at the “default” My computer level, you may
Ill check that out now - many thanks.
No reply from the support team yet ;(
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Miller Bonnie L.
mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu wrote:
Hit send too soon again—going to be one of those days.
After changing dcom permissions at the “default” My computer level, you
It sure beats $20-$30 a month land lines from ATT.
I say if you are going to use this product then assign a dedicated computer to
it. It may be crappy at times for some people but the issue may not always be
MagicJack. Ease up on downloading movies and porn 24/7 which will use up your
3 MB
Jason,
I have been using Magicjack for my only house phone for almost a year
now. The sound quality is excellent, I can call anyone, anywhere in the
United States for free, it costs $19.95 a year, and international rates
are dirt cheap. Unfortunately, to address your question, I have not
Za, I use an old 900MHz cordless phone with mine, with no issues. The
phone service doesn't use much bandwidth at all, but it will kick you to
desktop when a call comes in, which can be bothersome if you're in the
middle of a fight (I play Warhammer Online)
Joe Heaton
Employment Training
A former co-worker went to work for them and when he found a better job they
tried to hijack his last paycheck in return for their tools (fair) and
return of a cash bonus earned working over the Christmas holidays (NOT fair,
imho.) At least that's what my former co-worker said, and I have no
Do you have another higher GPO that has proxy settings defined in another area,
such as under \User configuration\Windows Settings\Internet Explorer
Maintenance\Connection/Proxy Settings?
-Bonnie
From: Rod Trent [mailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com]
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 4:13 AM
To: NT System
Thanks everybody for your feedback. We'll see what comes of it. Right
now we're leaning towards buying a couple and letting the users beat
them up down in Panama.
Jason
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 9:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
When I use Enterprise Mangler and check the properties of a DB, I can see for
both the db and log filename which shows its name, and location which shows
its actual filename.
When I use Query Analyzer and execute a sp_helpfile I see name which matches
file name and filename which matches
Hi,
When you connect to SQL Server from an application you need to specify which
database you want to use - that's what the DB name is for. If you don't specify
a name you end up in the default database configured for the user in question.
If you need to reference objects in other databases,
Ken,
Under Enterprise mangler, I have Databses - DB_A, master, etc.
The application only has configuration referencing the name DB_A but this db
has filename's with associated names that are different. Should I be concerned
that the restore db has those different filenames?
Thanks!
jlc
From:
We have a workstation running Windows XP sp2. This workstation must
transfer files from it's local C:\ to a folder on a network share. The
file is typically about 330 megs or so.
The problem is that copying the file is taking up to 30 minutes using
Windows Exploder.
The odd thing is, if
I have seen simlar behavior with Quickbooks 2006 and 2007 when multi-user
mode is installed and QB installs its own database engine.
You didn't mention any applications already installed, so I had to throw out
my wild guess.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Kim Longenbaugh
Have you disabled the Scalable Network feature on the server?
Did you check both the switch the nic settings on the servers to make
sure they're identical?
Scott Kaufman
Lead Network Analyst
ITT ESI, Inc.
From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Thursday, March
Try setting the NIC to auto negotiate or just auto.
Cheers.
From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 11:23 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: file copy strangeness
We have a workstation running
Are you getting slow performance even if you pick the file from the sharing
machine ?
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Inviato: giovedì 5 marzo 2009 18.23
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: file copy strangeness
We have a workstation
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Kim Longenbaugh
k...@colonialsavings.com wrote:
The problem is that copying the file is taking up to 30 minutes using
Windows Exploder.
The odd thing is, if we transfer a file TO the workstation
from the network, it goes extremely fast.
Try the copy with
I'll lump all the answers to each question here:
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 11:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: file copy strangeness
I have seen simlar behavior with Quickbooks 2006 and 2007 when
multi-user mode is
Heck a white font on white body text has the same overall effect (as long as
not viewed in plain-text mode). Former employer, had similr trick for
encrypting messages leaving the domain. So most customer service simply put
the encryption word in their signatures.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:24 AM,
We may be needing a VPN connection to our remote data center in the near
future for a small office, about 20 users.
Does anybody have any experience with the Cisco/Linksys RVS4000? I
tried a SonicWall once, it was way over my head, and support was
horrendous.
This will operate solely as 2
No experience with that model, but I can say that current SonicWALL
devices are very easy to site-2-site VPN. Their support for me in the
past year has been very easy to deal with.
--
ME2
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Sam Cayze sam.ca...@rollouts.com wrote:
We may be needing a VPN
I just recently asked the list about Site to Site VPN solutions. It's called
Site to Site VPN... What works? Check out them in the archives:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/search/results?forum=ntsysadminwords=Site+to+Site+VPN...+What+works?sb=1
We ended up using IPSec between our two
Anyone do the single server install of SCOM 2007? Specifically I was
wondering what SQL 2005 permissions the account that is installing needs
within SQL. Our DBA group did the SQL install and gave my account the
dbcreator and public roles within SQL. That does not seem to be enough for
the
Also, with a SonicWALLs running at each end-point, it took literally 5
minutes to go through the wizards on each end to build the site-2-site
VPN. It was super-easy.
One negative thing that I definately have to throw out there, is that
the CMD line interface (if thats you preference) is
Posting to the list or the forums on myIT?
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:28 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SCOM 2007 install issue
Anyone do the single server install of SCOM 2007? Specifically I was
wondering what
Thanks Mike, I am fairly unfamiliar with routers and networking, so I won't be
using any line interfaces! :) I'm looking for easy and familiar, hence why
Linksys was the first place I looked.
I appreciate the input.
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr
Something to keep in mind is if the device has seperate processing for
the encyption. If not, it can impede the overall performance of the
device. Again, I'm not familiar with this particular unit, but I've
seen other low-end device suffer severly because of the lack of
over-all horsepower when
Windows Exploder?
Sounds like something Shook would use. ;-P
On Mar 5, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Kim Longenbaugh
k...@colonialsavings.com wrote:
The problem is that copying the file is taking up to 30 minutes using
Windows
Yes. You need sa, unfortunately.
shameless plug
You can read my book for some additional details (I've got two chapters on
installing OpsMgr and a chapter on SQL Monitoring).
/shameless plug
In general, the install and the management pack do so much more than just
deal with the
Well, we're using an ASA and two Pixes here to connect three lans together
if that helps. I'm the IT Manager, but I'm not a Cisco guy. I've got a
vendor who handles all that for us. J There's a Cisco user list that I'm
subscribe to. maybe you'd like to join up on there:
Just curious, and I'm not sure what it would mean, but what happens if you
try to pull the file from the workstation instead of push to the server?
Does that make a difference?
John-AldrichTile-Tools
From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009
you're confusing that with Windows Exposer.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Mailed2TheWall mailed2thew...@gmail.comwrote:
Windows Exploder?
Sounds like something Shook would use. ;-P
On Mar 5, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Kim
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Sam Cayze sam.ca...@rollouts.com wrote:
Does anybody have any experience with the Cisco/Linksys RVS4000?
Not that one in particular, but I've had exposure to a few different
LinkSys encryption boxes in the past, and they've all sucked.
Inadequate processing
More bang for the buck
-Original Message-
From: Mailed2TheWall [mailto:mailed2thew...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: file copy strangeness
Windows Exploder?
Sounds like something Shook would use. ;-P
On Mar 5, 2009, at 11:04
/trivia
It's not an option but you actually can set to Nt5DS quickly from the
command line, I used to do it rather frequently at a site where people
always fooled with the time service to get it back in the proper domain
hierarchy with no fuss.
If you issue net time /setsntp: with no value
So this was pre-2003? (When Linksys was acquired by Cisco?)
Any good recommendations?
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM,
As long as I can remember it's been sarcastically/in-jest called Windows
Exploder and Internet Exploder
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Mailed2TheWall mailed2thew...@gmail.comwrote:
Windows Exploder?
Sounds like something Shook would use. ;-P
On Mar 5, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Ben Scott
Um - we're talking about the installation here...
I would suggest that dbcreator is probably sufficient to create the database,
but is the account then dbo for that database? The installation will the need
to create tables etc, so dbo is probably the easiest way.
Cheers
Ken
From: Michael B.
Hi,
If you are talking about the physical filenames (of the mdf, ldf files etc)
then they do not have any strict relationship to the name of the database at
all.
By default, database files/filegroups and log files are given the same name as
the database name, but they can be anything
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Kim Longenbaugh
k...@colonialsavings.com wrote:
The workstation nic was set to auto, switch on 100/full ...
That could be the problem right there. The way Ethernet is
designed, if duplex is manually set, it *disables* auto-negotiation.
So if one end is set
Well the danged turkeys aren't going to kill themselves!
-Original Message-
From: Mailed2TheWall [mailto:mailed2thew...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: file copy strangeness
Windows Exploder?
Sounds like something Shook would
I'm not sure how to interpret this either, but when I log on to the
server and pull the file from the workstation, the 330 meg file copies
in about 45 seconds, instead of 30-45 minutes when I copy it from the
workstation to the server.
Go figure.
From:
Ditto- 7301 MB-
Adopted June 2004...
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 10:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is my Google bigger than yours? Lets check!
I was an early adopter as well...I
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Sam Cayze sam.ca...@rollouts.com wrote:
So this was pre-2003? (When Linksys was acquired by Cisco?)
It between 2001 and 2004. LinkSys might have been acquired by Cisco
during this time span, but Cisco certainly hadn't had a chance to
effect any real change
Ah, one of the many nicknames of Windows Explorer:
Exploder
Exploiter
Expunger
Extractor
etc...
--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District
- Original Message -
From: Mailed2TheWall
[mailto:mailed2thew...@gmail.com]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Might need to change that chapter? J
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SCOM 2007 install issue
Um - we're talking about the installation here...
I would suggest that dbcreator is probably
Hi,
The nic was originally set to auto, with the switch on 100/full. I changed it
to 100/full on both ends, with no change. I totally agree with you that
autonegotiation can be a real pita.
I also agree that something could have changed with out us being aware of it.
The people that share
And then there's Device Mangler, Task Mangler, etc, etc.
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: file copy strangeness
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security
No. I read the OP's question too quickly.
From: Rod Trent [mailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 5:41 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SCOM 2007 install issue
Might need to change that chapter? J
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
My earliest email in this account dates from April 2005. I no longer
remember who gave me the invitation - it might have been someone at my
place of work, but it's more than a week ago, so it's passed through
my memory into the bit bucket...
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 13:43, Free, Bob r...@pge.com
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Kim Longenbaugh
k...@colonialsavings.com wrote:
And then there’s “Device Mangler”, “Task Mangler”, etc, etc.
I like to rename things to My Confuser and Nyetwork Places. And
there's server = swerver
Back in the NetWare 3.x days, we always said stupidvisor
How can you cancel out of a prompt you're not getting? I've re-read all of
your posts and I can't make much sense of any of them based on my used of
TC. How did you encrypt the drive? You went through the System Encrypt
System Partition/Drive process via the menu correct?
--
Mike Gill
Hi all,
I'm working on getting our first stand-alone Vista computers set up.
By stand-alone, I mean these computers are not and cannot be
connected to *ANY* network -- including the Internet. No Ethernet, no
modem, no nuttin'. The only way files get to these computers is by
sneakernet --
Ben,
Have you looked at this project?
http://www.heise.de/ct/projekte/offlineupdate/download_uk.shtml
We have used this for remote systems with no network access with good success.
I can't vouch for the scriptability (its used so sparingly that we use the
GUI), but from the interface I am
Doesn't TrueCrypt have a cmd interface? I used it a while ago (4.x) and had
a .cmd file to mount and dismount an encrypted drive (USB-based in that
instance).
Mike.
From: Mike Gill [mailto:lis...@canbyfoursquare.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:15 pm
To: NT System Admin Issues
http://microsoft.com/mbsa
Is probably what you want. You'll have to go through a 2-or-3 step process,
since you don't/can't have net access, but it can provide you what you need.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 7:04 PM
To:
On the Forums. I haven't subscribed to any of the discussion lists on your
site.
Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax:
Its funny, because of a few Linksys routers, they were advertising 50 or even
70 vpns. After playing with them and getting them to work, that number is the
max number of defined vpns. It takes a little while to figure out to setup
Linksys vpns, static ip on at least one end, and psk, is not too
As I mentioned before, I like Linksys products for lots of things, but
they have always tested weak in relation to IPSec VPN throughput.
I would strongly recommend against using them unless you have seen
numbers that show a particular model to be comparitively better than
similar competitor
Michael,
Thanks for the direct reply. Unfortunately I just purchased the Unleashed
book or I'd take you up on that. :-)
I'll see if our DBA group will agree to give my account SA for the
install. Can you clarify a few more points on that?
1. After the install I'm assuming that my
My experience is that things have not changed much on that front.
As of last August Linksys gear was still slow and unreliable.
Ben Scott wrote:
It between 2001 and 2004. LinkSys might have been acquired by Cisco
during this time span, but Cisco certainly hadn't had a chance to
effect any
Refer to Ken's improvement on my answer to your question (actually, he
answered it, I didn't - shame on me). For INSTALLATION the account needs
dbcreator and dbo.
AFAIK, the SQL MP only uses (by default) the action.account. Can I ask why
you aren't going with Local System?
If your
I've typically done this with Kerberos - not too hard to do.
What all are you trying to accomplish, specifically?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:40 AM
To: NT System Admin
They will expire 60 days from when they were last changed. That means that if
all your user's passwords were last set a year ago, and you set this policy
today, they will all be forced to change next time they logon.
The mitigation plan for this is to first mark password never expires on every
That is incorrect. AD has no way of knowing when the policy was set. The
calculation is done at logon comparing the max password age and the password
age on the account.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
Active Directory, 4th Ed - http://www.briandesmond.com/ad4/
Password never expires trumps the setting set in GP.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 10:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
This is actually something one major company I know did. They made the expiry
annual and the min password length something like 15 characters.
The math is based on how long it takes to do the cracking/table generation for
length K versus expiry N.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
That's a huge liability you're taking asking for someone's password. Really bad
idea.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Cameron Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 10:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Password Policy
That is not correct. AD does not force a password change when you uncheck
password never expires in ADUC. All that happens is the bit on the account is
cleared and the SAM logic which checks for an expired password becomes
effective.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c -
This only becomes effective when the password is next set. Passwords are stored
in an encrypted hash format on each DC. Changing the policy has no means of
accessing and validating the passwords. The logic that implements the policy
only fires when a user password changes.
Thanks,
Brian
It will use other DCs but it will always contact the PDC for things like
machine account password changes, user password changes, etc. In the event you
have an application using legacy Net* APIs, they may supply flags that force
the PDCe to be returned each time.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
Why? What's the point of a BDC if clients never talk to it?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
Active Directory, 4th Ed - http://www.briandesmond.com/ad4/
Microsoft MVP - https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Brian
From: Christopher Bodnar
Managed Service Accounts in 2008R2/Win7 is a feature that will help alleviate
some of this.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Scott Kaufman at HQ [mailto:skauf...@ittesi.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:36 PM
To: NT System
To promote if the PDC dies...
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 18:53, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com wrote:
Why? What’s the point of a BDC if clients never talk to it?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
Active Directory, 4th Ed -
So you're saying the customers who had BDCs in dozens of sites worldwide never
actually had any clients talking to those locally placed BDCs?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday,
SQL Server Management Pack uses SQLDMO for certain things, and that requires
elevated permissions.
However most monitoring will work with just datareader permissions across all
the databases to be monitored (plus tempdb and master)
Cheers
Ken
From: Michael B. Smith
Under NT4, the BDCs do actually process logon requests.
My response was a bit tongue-in-cheek.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 19:05, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com wrote:
So you're saying the customers who had BDCs in dozens of sites worldwide
never actually had any clients talking to those
Uh..I wouldn't agree with most. I'd go with some.
And I don't think that discovery is going to work well with just datareader.
That being said, I know you've got a large installation and you may have
done lots of work with low privilege environments. J
From: Ken Schaefer
This is not correct.
In 2008 in order to implement FGPPs (fine grained password policies), the
individual domain DFL must be DFL3 (2008 functional level). Passwords are a per
domain thing so it's OK to not be at FFL3 (2008 functional level).
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c -
OK sorry I missed the sarcasm - my bad.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 9:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: NT4 in a 2003 domain
Under NT4, the BDCs
Actually, just repeating what Kevin Holman said. I'm trying to get budget to
have more detailed investigation done in our environment.
AFAIK discovery of objects involves querying the master database, so datareader
would be enough there.
Cheers
Ken
From: Michael B. Smith
If a MS patch was downloaded but not yet installed and a new version was
released what is the best practice to get the new installed ?
TIA
GuidoElia
HELPPC
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Go with MPLS and 2 Cisco routers (1800 or 2800 series)
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Inviato: giovedì 5 marzo 2009 20.54
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: Site to Site VPN?
We may be needing a VPN connection to our remote data center in the near
97 matches
Mail list logo
